sprinter to ford/chevy

guido4475

Not a Member
C series = pickup
K series = 4wd pickup
G series = van
P series = parcel delivery or step van

That's about how I remember it from when I was in the parts biz .... How about you Greg ? ..... :)

Guid,

'zactly what years wuz these unibody GM vans produced? .... Musta been a pretty rare beast .... I sure never seen one .... Mebbe you talkin' Astro van or sumthin' .....
Why does it have to be that there are some people on this site that have to pick apart a post? nitpick!! do you have nothing else better to do? get a frickin life!! and, what, you cant argue with me by yourself, so you have to ask others to join in on your dissagreement? it was a 85-87 model year.and yes, it was a c-30 van.full-size, rwd,unibody.
 

fastrod

Expert Expediter
I had a 76 full size gm van, a 78 full size gm van, a 89 full size gm van and now a 2000 dodge full size van and all are what I consider unibodies. I also had a 89 full size ford van that was a full frame van. What I consider unibody is having a stamped steel u channel welded to a floorpan and that is how the gm and dodges are made. The ford had the body attached to the full frame with bolts and rubber bushings.
 

Jack_Berry

Moderator Emeritus
checking unibody in wikipedia comes up with this:




Spot welded unibody construction is now the dominant technique in automobiles, though some vehicles (particularly trucks) still use the older body-on-frame technique.
Some American automobiles, such as the 1967-81 Chevrolet Camaro and Pontiac Firebird, 1968-79 Chevrolet Nova and virtually all Chrysler Corporation automobiles from 1960 until the early 1980s, used a compromise design with a partial monocoque combined with a subframe carrying the front end and powertrain. The intention was to provide some of the rigidity and strength of a unibody while easing manufacture, although the results were mixed, in large part because the powertrain subframe contained the greatest single portion of the vehicle's overall mass, and thus movement of the subframe relative to the rest of the body could cause distortion and vibration. Subframes or partial subframes are still sometimes employed in otherwise monocoque construction, typically as a way of isolating the vibration and noise of powertrain or suspension components from the rest of the vehicle.


looks like the truck body in a cocoon and could mis construed as a unibody but is really body on frame.




here is the rest of the link
Monocoque - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

fastrod

Expert Expediter
Monocoque from wikipedia. Unibody or unitary construction is a related construction technique for automobiles in which the body is integrated into a single unit with the chassis rather than having a separate body on frame. The welded unit body is the predominant automobile construction technology today. Chevy and Dodge vans are welded unit bodies referred to as unibodies. Not quite as rare as some would think.
 

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Chevy and Dodge vans are welded unit bodies referred to as unibodies. Not quite as rare as some would think.

I don't know about Dodge vans. I am on my second Chevrolet 3500 and G.M. says I have a full length boxed frame. I call it a ladder frame. It's like these two long rail things with cross-members. If you removed all the excess junk like the body, axles, engine, fuel tank, spare tire, transmission, exhaust system and secret spare key holder, the remainder would resemble a ladder. Use your imagination or drugs, but what's left does indeed look like a ladder. Not a eunuch's body!
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
For all the years i have worked on the things owning them, I have yet to see a unibody GM product, they take pride in their chassis.

My last GM product, my 99 GMC van had a frame, a real frame like Moot described it. But my present 1973 Dodge van is a unibody van. My brother-in-law's Ford is also a real frame.

G means Van Series in GM speak. The C30 that you have/had is a badge, just like Vandura or Beauville but may have been a commercial version of those models. I don't have my Gm parts manuals with me to tell you the difference or why some call it s C30 but I do know that a C30 was used on their trucks.

As for getting a life, well when parts and vehicles are one's buisness, you don't forget things.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Why does it have to be that there are some people on this site that have to pick apart a post?
... because it beats doin' the Expediter Zombie Stare .... ?

nitpick!! do you have nothing else better to do? get a frickin life!!
Thanks - I have a frickin' life ...... :rolleyes:

and, what, you cant argue with me by yourself, so you have to ask others to join in on your dissagreement?
No - not at all - I'm quite capable of arguing with you by myself :D, it was just that I knew Greg has a background in the automotive parts aftermarket, as do I. I'd imagine he's spent lots of time looking up parts for vehicles (as have I), which is often done, at least to some extent, by model no. designation. Hence the familiarity ......

it was a 85-87 model year.and yes, it was a c-30 van.full-size, rwd,unibody.
Well, 1985 was the year I sold out my interest and got out of the business, so I can't comment with any real familiarity on what happened after that - but I can tell you with a fairly great degree of certainty, that prior to that time, I am not familiar of any GM vans with a model designation of "C" - possibly these two articles might refresh things a bit for you:

C/K Series

Chevrolet G Series Vans
 

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Ford, with a full frame, was the easiest.Chevy, with the unibody, was a total nightmare
Guido, you were young, naive and working in a chopshop; could you have mistaken an Astro van for a full size van?

I used to drive a c-30 one ton chevy also for delivery for the local newspaper.Sundays were the worst.Fully loaded, front to back, side to side, top to bottom with sunday papers, I could actually feel the body twisting as i turned corners or went down the road.

Any idea what all those newspapers weighed? Again, could you have been driving an Astro van?

Have you ever met George Jetson? Jane his wife? Daughter Judy? His boy Elroy. Astro the dog? They rock! Just like Michelle Obama. Outa this world dude. Like totally cosmic, Ray.
 

fastrod

Expert Expediter
Here is the correct answer, 1995 and older chevy and gmc vans used unibody construction. When GM redesigned there full size vans for 1996 they went to a full frame with a body that bolted on.
 

2czykats

Seasoned Expediter
Bottom line to OP is the Sprinter is junk with a few good sprinkled in but most are nightmares waiting to happen. I know, I owned 3 and was a major factor in my buisness hitting the crapper.

Replaced 1 with a 05 Chevy 2500 Duramax diesal and we loved it. Only differance was no hightop but managed 22 to 23 mpg and parts are soooooo much cheaper and anyone can work on them.

I got out of expediting after trying Panther, Express 1,(liked them the best) and Bolt. Just could not scrimp that long. I am looking at getting a passenger van now and am at a toss up between Chevy and Ford. Ford seems to be nicer inside, but one thing is the Sprinter is not in the lineup.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Bottom line to OP is the Sprinter is junk with a few good sprinkled in but most are nightmares waiting to happen. I know, I owned 3 and was a major factor in my buisness hitting the crapper.
Hey - aren't you the guy that said:

I had 3 not happy with them. One guy I knew had 540,000 miles and replaced engine for 9,000.00 but did preventive maintenace through out so everything else was fine.

Hmmmm ..... I wonder if that preventative maintenance thing might have had anything to do with the longevity ..... or your luck .... :rolleyes:

But then you did also say he replaced the engine for $13K in another post here:

Sprinter Thoughts

.... so I'm not really sure if I want to rely on what you are saying or not ........

I once met a Panther driver out in Tulsa, OK. and he was telling me about his woes in dealing with the fleetowner he drove for ..... he had told the owner that the van he was driving (a Ford, not that it makes any difference - could happen to any of them) had a wheelbearing going bad (you could hear it) .... the fleetowner's response ?

"Don't worry about it ..... drive it until it fails ....."

Not hard to imagine that owner complaining about the "junk" bearings Ford puts in their vans ..... probably right about the time he's getting the call about the wheel having come off ...... :rolleyes:

Ya can't fix stupid ......
 

2czykats

Seasoned Expediter
Hey - aren't you the guy that said:



Hmmmm ..... I wonder if that preventative maintenance thing might have had anything to do with the longevity ..... or your luck .... :rolleyes:

But then you did also say he replaced the engine for $13K in another post here:

Sprinter Thoughts

.... so I'm not really sure if I want to rely on what you are saying or not ........

I once met a Panther driver out in Tulsa, OK. and he was telling me about his woes in dealing with the fleetowner he drove for ..... he had told the owner that the van he was driving (a Ford, not that it makes any difference - could happen to any of them) had a wheelbearing going bad (you could hear it) .... the fleetowner's response ?

"Don't worry about it ..... drive it until it fails ....."

Not hard to imagine that owner complaining about the "junk" bearings Ford puts in their vans ..... probably right about the time he's getting the call about the wheel having come off ...... :rolleyes:

Ya can't fix stupid ......


Yes, I am the guy that said that. I also said there are a few good sprinkled in there and pm is always the best way to keep equioment in tip top shape. The guy I knew was very picky about his van and I met him in the bay at a Freightliner shop in Indianapolis and his motor was rattling so loud like marbles in a coffee can. They ordered him a new motor for 9,000.00. Would have been half that for chevy or ford. Same dealership quoted me 13,000.00 for same motor.

I also did PM work on all 3 of my Sprinters, who wouldn't after spending that kind of money, and still had a rearend (2500.00) go out at 130,000 miles and 1 yr old. (chevy or ford 800.00. Another tranny went out at 130,000 miles (quoted 9,000.00 at same dealer) ford or chevy less than half. I don't have the time to list everything. My cousin bought his in 04 after hearing how much I liked mine, in the beginning, and he works for Fed Ex Ground and his sits on his back lot with a bout every major part replaced except motor and tranns with 225,000 miles and not running again. Says he won't fix it this time and has replaced with 2 Chevy 3500 Duramax diesals and has excellent use so far.

When we were on the road we had a hell of a time finding places to do oil changes and ended up driving way over till we got home to go to dealer there. I'm glad you like yours and hope you get many more lucrative miles out of it. Just not my cup of tea. Sorry for ranting, and no harm intended.
 

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Clue Number 1:

When we were on the road we had a hell of a time finding places to do oil changes and ended up driving way over till we got home to go to dealer there.


I AM THE CLOUDS
I AM EMBROIDERED
ICH BIN DER AUTOR ALLER FELGEN
UND DAMAST PASPELN
ICH BIN DER CHROME DINETTE
ICH BIN DER CHROME DINETTE
ICH BIN EIER ALLER ARTEN
...... F.Z.
 

2czykats

Seasoned Expediter
clue number 1:




i am the clouds
i am embroidered
ich bin der autor aller felgen
und damast paspeln
ich bin der chrome dinette
ich bin der chrome dinette
ich bin eier aller arten
...... F.z.




I AM THE CLOUDS
I AM EMBROIDERED
I AM THE AUTHOR OF ALL THE RIMS
AND DAMASK PIPING
I AM THE CHROME DINETTE
I HAVE EGG ALL SPECIES

JETZT was Zum Teufel hat das damit zu tun, Alles in Dieserstelle?
 
Last edited:

guido4475

Not a Member
I didnt mean to go off on you like that, mr relent, so i apologize, but I consider a unibody to be a vehicle where the sub-frame(c-channel) is welded to the body itself.and, of course, the full-frame being a frame separate from the body, with the body mounted to the frame by means of rubber mounts witha bolt through them.that is the way vans were when i used to work at that shop.it wasnt a chop shop, even though it sounds like what it was.the chevy van i drove was had the emblem on the side, front fender, that said "chevy van" with c-30 underneath it.it wasnt an astro.those werent out till the early to mid 90's, werent they? our vans at the time had a 350-4bbl engine,cant remember what trans, but they had 4:11 posi in them.16" rims.they would run good, and pull the loads good.and i am more than sure they were way overloaded. especially on sundays.but anyways, i was just making a statement, not trying to start an arguement, even if it appeared that way.
 

aristotle

Veteran Expediter
Teutonic plague! Parlez vous Francais? J'adore les femme. Laissez les bon temps roulez. Fiat, Simca, Peugot...
 

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
guido4475;29627it wasnt a chop shop said:
I know. I was having some fun because as you said; it sounded like a chopshop.

2czykats: you are one sick person. Or is that 2 sick persons? Welcome aboard!

Turtle: I am the Mootman.
 

2czykats

Seasoned Expediter
I know. I was having some fun because as you said; it sounded like a chopshop.

2czykats: you are one sick person. Or is that 2 sick persons? Welcome aboard!

Turtle: I am the Mootman.

My wife and I are equally sick, I hope you mean in a joking way. We still don't understand what the foreign languages mean as to the post. But had fun translating and confusing ourselves further.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Yes, I am the guy that said that. I also said there are a few good sprinkled in there and pm is always the best way to keep equioment in tip top shape.
Yup - you did - and I tried to point that out when I quoted you.

The guy I knew was very picky about his van and I met him in the bay at a Freightliner shop in Indianapolis and his motor was rattling so loud like marbles in a coffee can.
Obviously, it can happen to any of them - the owner of the company I used to be leased on with was on his second Powerstoke Diesel ..... the first having failed at less than 150K or 200K miles IIRC.

On the otherhand, I know a guy who services a small fleet of Sprinters (around 40 I think) over Pittsburgh (which is the HQ of Fedex Ground, BTW :rolleyes:) and the majority of those vehicles currently have between 400K and 600K miles on them - with the original motors and transmissions.

They ordered him a new motor for 9,000.00.
Dunno what year he had (you may have mentioned it earlier) but I know that the OM647 (MBE 600) engine in my '06 Sprinter dealer lists for $7559.66 - but I can get it, discounted, for $6475.21 from Berry Dodge (Wholesale Dodge Sprinter Parts) - and I believe that's for a new, complete Benz engine - not a reman ..... and even if it were a reman, well, just keep on reading ...... (BTW - Berry Dodge isn't the only source either - there are also a few other Dodge dealers that have an internet presence and sell OEM parts at a discount.)

Would have been half that for chevy or ford.
Yeah ..... I just priced one - a 7.3 diesel for '03 E-350 from Jasper and the price was $8518.00 .... for a reman engine ......

And the core charge was around $2200 (I'm assuming that you would have to supply them with a rebuildable core ...... and that if you couldn't - like say if the block was scraped out from throwing a rod or something - that the price just got more expensive by $2200)

Of course, you could probably buy a gas reman for quite a bit less .... but I'm trying to keep it apples to apples .....

Same dealership quoted me 13,000.00 for same motor.
Yup ..... don't doubt it .... there's a reason why they are derisively referred to as "stealerships" .... and this isn't just a Sprinter, Dodge, or Mercedes thing either ..... like I said before, back when I was in the parts biz, car dealers were notorious for expensive, and often unneeded, repairs. The people that went to them either had money to burn - or just didn't know any better. It's the kind of thing that gave automotive technicians - mechanics, if you will - a very bad name.

Obviously, we are in a bit of different situation being out on the road - alot of the time you don't have a choice - you have to go somewhere to get it fixed if you have a breakdown, and one hopes that the dealer will provide competent service at a fair price .... sadly that is often not the case.

I also did PM work on all 3 of my Sprinters, who wouldn't after spending that kind of money, and still had a rearend (2500.00) go out at 130,000 miles and 1 yr old. (chevy or ford 800.00.
I can't comment on the pricing on the ford or chev as I'm not truly familiar with costs for those ..... except to say that that price seems cheap if we are talking an entire, complete, new rearend. If you got a new rearend for the Sprinter for $2500 - that's a decent price - list is almost $3500 for entire rear axle, complete (Single Rear Wheels, 3.72 axle ratio)

Another tranny went out at 130,000 miles (quoted 9,000.00 at same dealer) ford or chevy less than half.
Dealer list on a new NAG 1 for my Sprinter is $4,659.03 (new), Berry Dodge will sell ya one for $3,960.18. I've seen remans for as little as $2K.

I don't have the time to list everything. My cousin bought his in 04 after hearing how much I liked mine, in the beginning, and he works for Fed Ex Ground and his sits on his back lot with a bout every major part replaced except motor and tranns with 225,000 miles and not running again. Says he won't fix it this time and has replaced with 2 Chevy 3500 Duramax diesals and has excellent use so far.
Well, the obvious question is how many miles are on those Duramax's ..... as with most things, time and use will tell the tale - he might well have a better experience with than he did with the Sprinter, hard to say.

One thing is for sure though - life for a vehicle in service at Fedex Ground or Home Delivery is far harder on a vehicle than anything we subject them to.

When we were on the road we had a hell of a time finding places to do oil changes and ended up driving way over till we got home to go to dealer there.
I never had a problem - but that's because I carry oil, filters, and a drain jug and did my own ..... even in Canada .... in the middle of January (in the parking lot of the Husky out there at Dixie and the 401)

The Sprinter is possibly one of the most easiest, and least messy vehicles I have ever run across to do an oil change on - especially if you have a Fumoto quick drain valve - just stick a short piece of hose (6") on the nipple and drain it into a 2 1/2 gallon cat litter jug and replace the filter cartridge, which is self draining .... I had it down where I could do it in about 20 minutes (less actually, but I wanted to give the oil plenty of time to drain)

I'm glad you like yours and hope you get many more lucrative miles out of it.
Why, thank you - I hope so too. If I don't, it won't be for a lack of trying on my part, that I can assure you.

Just not my cup of tea.
Understand - they are not for everyone.

Sorry for ranting, and no harm intended.
Got it - no worries. My problem, with this thread specifically, started with the pronouncement, by another, that Sprinters were "junk".

Of course, the reality of it is, they aren't - but they are actually extremely sophisticated vehicles, in alot of ways.

Like any vehicle, they certainly have their idiosyncrasies (as well as their good points) - they can be expensive to fix, but they don't necessariiy have to be.

Sadly, I suspect that what has happened in terms of dealer repair costs for the Sprinter, is probably largely the fault of Chrysler, LLC (an American company) - not Daimler - and the "bill of goods" that Chrysler has "sold" to their dealer network, about how to bill and charge for their services. Couple that with (some) techs that are untrained and unfamiliar ... and that "don't want to work on that foreign vehicle" ..... and you have the formula for a less than ideal customer experience. Given the stupidity that the American cars companies have engaged in over the last 30 or so years I guess it shouldn't really come as a big surprise ...... :cool:

Sprinters are viewed much differently over in Europe and other parts of the world, than here on the North American continent - although they have far more real competition over there than here (in terms of vehicles that are roughly similar, in terms of cargo space) ..... Fiat has a product, and of course so does Ford (the Transit) and I believe there are a few others .... but largely, most want the Sprinter .... because the quality of the product is better than most of the competition.

They are sold and serviced by Mercedes-Benz over there ..... MBUSA didn't want any part of that here - it was a PR/positioning thing - they didn't want a commercial vehicle associated with a Benz in the minds of the (gullible) Amercian car-buying public .... no surprise really - they're an American car company - and American car companies have a tendency to do stupid stuff.

BTW, Moot almost always means it in joking way .... he is possibly the most least serious person I have ever met (and that's actually a really good thing :D)
 
Last edited:
Top