S.C. nominee

tallcal101

Veteran Expediter
w had a very bad habit of finding the least quailfied then appointing them. It mattered not their gender,race or age. Gonzalves was a prime example of w's rainbow approach to his cabnet.His DOJ lawyers,like the Asian gentleman who wrote the torture opinion is another fine example.And who can forget his age challeneged Secretary of Defense, Donny baby. Where the hell is that guy anyway?
Thomas was just one more in a long list of poor choices who has been a good rainbow soldier and "knows his place" on the court,and who got him there.So many varied face's in this rainbow. Greg speaks so highly of them,his kind of multi racical and gender folks,thats for sure!!. Rice now lives back in Palo Alto and is part of the right wing think tank known as the Hoover Instute on War.Every time she gets in front of a group of students she is shouted down for her support of the lies and for taking us to war for the pure pig stabbing joy of it. Another ardent rainbow worrier. Yea,old w really picked a rogues gallery from the American landsacpe of big thinkers and available yes folks,and he did not discriminate,and that should be seen as big POSITIVE,NICE GOING W!!

Too bad they destroyed our country.
 
Last edited:

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
And Cal, other than the usual and expected liberal bashing of Bush, conservatives, prior administrations your last post has what to do with the topic and what to offer to the discussion of the current poor and unqualified nominee?
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
well it does point out that not only Obama and the right have poor choices.....Rummy was a poor D .M.
Rice was a yes party line girl....

And besides...some others here have gotten off track beating down this one....so equal press time....:rolleyes:
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
TallCal is just another Dumb-O-Crat party hack!! We have to deal with the scum in office now Cal, that last scum is out!! Obama could NOT get a security clearence with his backround. His pick is racist. She is as unqualified as Obama. Even IF you beleive that Bush made unqualified picks, that is no reason for Obama to do the same. When are you going to get it? THEY ALL SUCK!!! VOTE ALL THE SCUM OUT!! EVERY IMCUMBENT, EVERY ELECTION!! WE are suspossed to control the government, not they us. Or are you opposed to that as well? All these CZARS with no congressional oversite it circumventing the checks and balances in the Constitution and giving the executive branch WAY to much un-checked power. THAT is called fascism!! Obama is a BIG fan of that. He is doing a better job of gutting the Constitution than Bush did!! Now, please call me a gun nut and rant some more.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Andy, man take it easy.
I understand where you are coming from but it gets tiring hearing the same thing over and over again.

Nothing was destroyed that wasn't already destroyed. It wasn't Bush that destroy the country, it was the people who protested the war, the government and the way of American life.

It wasn't Rumsfeld who caused the deaths of the soldiers who went off to the middle east, it was that pathetic old man carter who has blood on his hands.

I got to remind you that Rice wasn't the one who was there when war was declared, it was that turncoat Powell that was in the SoS position. She inherited the mess he made trying to sabotage a lot of the work going on to ensure a quick end to the war and he was one who is to blame for the mess in Iraq just as much as the others before him like Clinton and Carter.

But it don't matter because you don't realize that the 60's screwed up the country. We can not return to anything civil until people who see the world differently surrender themselves to the twisted thinking of that past from this twisted point of view. There is no dialog, many have proved as much as the students who shout people down on stage or those who have an opposing point of view or when they were getting off the plane from Vietnam - no first amendment rights for those hate mongering war promoting bigots who fought for those rights but many think Jane Fonda is a hero which is really twisted way of thinking. How about Jeannene Garafolo and her uneducated, dumba** comments, can you get a better poster girl for public mental health services? It isn't just her, it is most of the Hollywood crowd who is clueless but won't be if we lost our rights - they will be the first to do as they are told or else.

Too many who lived and protested in the past are stuck in in the past without seeing anything beyond their pipe and it has been that way for the past 40 years. It is sad when you think about it, the most selfish people on earth have been borne out of that time period, a time of self-indulgence, propaganda and ignorance, they blame everyone else for not changing the world but they refuse to change with the times when change is necessary. It is their world that has been destroyed and rightfully so, it is their selfish world that has created this mess of hatred and mis-information and they don't realize what was lost but they are angry about the assault on their country and their people. Ask one of them to help build a better place, to share in their success and what do you get "man I gave at the office..... you do it"
 
Last edited:

tallcal101

Veteran Expediter
You know whats humorous to me? I really reflect a mind set here that is not nearly as off the charts as most of my neighbors and friends. I tone it way down so Leo allows me to stay here. Greg,I cannot change the Carter years,or the Clinton years or any of the ancient history you continualy dredge up (it's getting really old).

However, if you really want to bring it up,it's really no different to mke then the Vietnam war. I took strong a position it was wrong,took to the streets,went to jail for a while,and helped end the ****ed thing.I was not doing anything but being a good American who was fed up with an unjust war that happened to take the lives of 50,000 of my generations best.I don't care who started it,me and my friends ended it. Power to the people.

My problem with w is well documented on this forum. It was the present I had a problem with the last 8 years.It was not the ancient past, and it needed to end in 2004.You were a supporter for most of these years and viewed my position and opinion as somehow radical and out of step. I used the same tactics I used to help end the war,get out and make some noise.Pi** a few people off and excerise my right to do so.In 25 years I hope to be old and wise and not concerned about w and his gang of merry men and women. I think we can put Carter to bed Greg,and in a few years,after Obama straightens things out (next year at this time) I will lose some of my anger and utter distain for w and those that helped him and those that voted twice for him.
Until then,I guess I'm still that old 60's radical fightn' the good battle for truth,justice and the American way. Sorry if it bores you.
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
I hope you stick around, Cal, so you can tell us how great Obama is doing, while the country falls apart due to his policies. We'll need some comic relief, so we don't commit suicide.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
You know whats humorous to me? I really reflect a mind set here that is not nearly as off the charts as most of my neighbors and friends. I tone it way down so Leo allows me to stay here. Greg,I cannot change the Carter years,or the Clinton years or any of the ancient history you continualy dredge up (it's getting really old).

However, if you really want to bring it up,it's really no different to mke then the Vietnam war. I took strong a position it was wrong,took to the streets,went to jail for a while,and helped end the ****ed thing.I was not doing anything but being a good American who was fed up with an unjust war that happened to take the lives of 50,000 of my generations best.I don't care who started it,me and my friends ended it. Power to the people.

My problem with w is well documented on this forum. It was the present I had a problem with the last 8 years.It was not the ancient past, and it needed to end in 2004.You were a supporter for most of these years and viewed my position and opinion as somehow radical and out of step. I used the same tactics I used to help end the war,get out and make some noise.Pi** a few people off and excerise my right to do so.In 25 years I hope to be old and wise and not concerned about w and his gang of merry men and women. I think we can put Carter to bed Greg,and in a few years,after Obama straightens things out (next year at this time) I will lose some of my anger and utter distain for w and those that helped him and those that voted twice for him.
Until then,I guess I'm still that old 60's radical fightn' the good battle for truth,justice and the American way. Sorry if it bores you.


Gee TalCal, in ANOTHER argument on the Cold War, Viet Nam theater argument, you told me that you ran up into the mountians of California and lived off of the land and even delivered one of your own children. Ok which is it? A man that ran and hid or one that took a stand? As to '60's radicals, nothing but whinney useless mal-contents who really messed up things and protected a VILE enemy and even supported them. That would be Russia, in case you have no idea about thier role in Viet Nam and the rest of what was going on. Sorry, but Russia WAS behind it and it is proven and correct. Too bad you know sooo little about history.
 

mjolnir131

Veteran Expediter
it's always easier to claim pacifism while standing on a street corner in the USA holding a sign, not so easy to stand between armies like Gandhi
 

DougTravels

Not a Member
.

She has also had over 60% of her decisions overturned by a higher court........

.

Does all that spinning make you dizzy?
From Factcheck.org:

Q: What percentage of Sonia Sotomayor's opinions have been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court?

Have Judge Sotomayor's decisions really been overturned 80 percent of the time as Rush Limbaugh stated on May 26?

A: Three of her opinions have been overturned, which is 1.3 percent of all that she has written and 60 percent of those reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Of the majority opinions that Judge Sonia Sotomayor has authored since becoming an appellate judge in 1998, three of her appellate opinions have been overturned by the Supreme Court.

Our search for appellate opinions by Sotomayor on the LexisNexis database returned 232 cases. That's a reversal rate of 1.3 percent.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I would like a more non-biased answer than Rush or Factcheck can give. I just want raw numbers, with no spin. Rush puts his on and U.S. colleges spin the other way. FactCheck is run by a U.S. college. NON biased only.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
However, if you really want to bring it up,it's really no different to mke then the Vietnam war. I took strong a position it was wrong,took to the streets,went to jail for a while,and helped end the ****ed thing.I was not doing anything but being a good American who was fed up with an unjust war that happened to take the lives of 50,000 of my generations best.I don't care who started it,me and my friends ended it. Power to the people.
And tell us how you feel about the ramifications of your demonstrations, that it was those very demonstrations that emboldened a dejected North Vietnam to continue fighting just as they were about to give up (their words, not mine) and the fact that those actions enabled Pol Pot to assume power and kill millions of people? Or do you absolve yourself of having anything to do with any of that?
 
Last edited:

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The "Left" everywhere, even in this country, has NO problems what so ever with the millions that the "left" has murdered over the years. That was getting rid of "bad influences" As long as they are killing, it's cool and they back it. Only the U.S. can be wrong acording to the left.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
You know whats humorous to me? I really reflect a mind set here that is not nearly as off the charts as most of my neighbors and friends. I tone it way down so Leo allows me to stay here. Greg,I cannot change the Carter years,or the Clinton years or any of the ancient history you continualy dredge up (it's getting really old).

I bring carter up because of the blame you lay on Bush for Iraq. If you can't figure out what we are doing there and only see the death and destruction in this very small piece of the conflict, then Carter needs to be brought in to the picture to remind you that it was he that actually caused all of this in the first place. Tired or not, facts are facts and keeping your head in the sand doesn't help anyone, especially you.

Again I said this over and over Andy, You Do NOT understand the people. You Do NOT get the way they look at what makes an enemy and what makes a weak animal/country. We can not and will never derive any strength and respect through compassion with any of them, it has to be done with strength and without the wishy washy idiots over hear opening their mouths. Gates is a perfect example, he needs to shut his mouth about international affairs and stick with making sure we are prepared.

There are a lot of reasons for being in Iraq, one is to screw with Iran. These Iranian people, not the government already sees what is going on here in the US and over in Iraq and wants to see it happen in Iran. They are patient and they have a strong pride about their country, it's history and the people which means they will fight if we attack them but if they continue to see what is happening in Iraq and other places while helping them inside the country, they will fight for a change there and this is why we are there - to DEFUSE the government of Iran INTERNALLY. It only makes sense to do this, while we can change the government of Iraq at the same time.

However, if you really want to bring it up,it's really no different to mke then the Vietnam war. I took strong a position it was wrong,took to the streets,went to jail for a while,and helped end the ****ed thing.I was not doing anything but being a good American who was fed up with an unjust war that happened to take the lives of 50,000 of my generations best.I don't care who started it,me and my friends ended it. Power to the people.

First I have to reaffirm that I don't want to see anyone go off to war, I could not do much about that war and feel for everyone who lost their lives or were touched by the war. But I understand more of the behind the scenes things that happen then I did when I was around then. Meeting one key player in the war changed my attitude about him and his involvement, and especially about his apologizes for what deaths he caused.

The fact is, and it comes from the North Vietnamese, the protesting in this country helped them, it prolonged the war because they were ready to give up and when the campui(sp?) erupted, they continued to fight using the propaganda that these 'protesters' handed them. I know a few POWs and they still remember the cr*p used to bring down their moral - it was the beginning of my education on propaganda.

Wasn't it unjust because of the democrats who wanted to get involved, both Kennedys, LBJ, MacNamara and others all were involved on the dems' side of the aisle? Or was it with escalating the war in the first place? You seem to only remember that the republicans were bad during that time, right?

But then out of those questions arise another, if the war was unjust, and the people involved with it were democrats, why are you supporting the democrats now? It would only make sense that the party that started all of this is the party that you should shun, right?

AND another question that comes to mind is even if Nixon did the Watergate shuffle, did you also scream that he inherited an unjust war when he was elected in '68? It seems odd that many scream about Obama inheriting Bush's mess but it seems odd that many of these same people didn't use that excuse for Nixon.

Power to the People?

Yea sure Andy.

We have come so far from a good country to the depths of the abyss because of the power that was removed from the people using the same cr*p from the '60s. I remember the revolution in the air, I remember the attitudes but they were clueless then as they are still now. There is an absolute sad fact tied to the term Power to the People, a twisted fact - before the 60's and the coming of age stuff, the people held the real power, many held their representatives accountable and even the president through their power. Since that time, a shift was made thanks to the people who believed in that Power to the People and now it is the parties who hold the power, the corrupt organizations that hold the power, not the people, thanks man... I really appreciate the voter fraud and cheating my vote, the increase of my taxes to cover things like the invasion from the south and the subjugation of the people through half wit social programs like SCHIP... thanks man.

My problem with w is well documented on this forum. It was the present I had a problem with the last 8 years.It was not the ancient past, and it needed to end in 2004.You were a supporter for most of these years and viewed my position and opinion as somehow radical and out of step. I used the same tactics I used to help end the war,get out and make some noise.Pi** a few people off and excerise my right to do so.In 25 years I hope to be old and wise and not concerned about w and his gang of merry men and women. I think we can put Carter to bed Greg,and in a few years,after Obama straightens things out (next year at this time) I will lose some of my anger and utter distain for w and those that helped him and those that voted twice for him.

Well I am not happy with Bush either and a lot of others are not happy with him. I said there is one thing that you can impeach him on and it will stick - the border. I would even join you in protesting against him on that, maybe even pay your way to DC. But seeing that it is an issue for your buds and Nancy to allow the border to be wide open, the shift is something that can't be done impeaching him on Iraq.

Since 2000, we have heard so much hate about the man and the people governed this country and see that it still continues today. If anything, I can't see anyone like you not letting go of it because of your deep hatred for the man. I honestly think it goes to the root of the problems many of your type have, when you lose it you can't handle it.

AND Andy I got to tell you that I can not see Obama doing anything positive other making people happy and glee over confirming their hatred, verifying that they are justified for the last 10 years of thier lives being a mess because of their inability to understand anything beyond the defeat in 2000. It is sad when you think about it, here is a man that is selling you and I out, but we can't come together to actually stop it because there is too much hate that is acting like a barrier between us and the hate isn't from my side of the fence. I want to see a change from the inside, like a serious change of my senators and congressman but you want to dwell on the past with Bush. You get what I'm saying?

Until then,I guess I'm still that old 60's radical fightn' the good battle for truth,justice and the American way. Sorry if it bores you.

No it doesn't bore me, it is great to have you scream all of this because you are right to fight for the right things but you can't do it with hate and that seems to be what many are using to base their fight on, hating the person, you know what I mean?
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Does all that spinning make you dizzy?
From Factcheck.org:

STOP DOUG!

It is not a credible source and here's why;
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]
The Annenberg Political Fact Check (aka factcheck.org) is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania.

Got it so far?

It is connected to
[/FONT]The Annenberg Foundation

Understand that part?

It is suspect of being credible because in part of the following.

From CNN POLITICS - 10/7/08

"....
A review of board minutes and records by CNN show Obama crossed paths repeatedly with Ayers at board meetings of the Annenberg Challenge Project.


The Annenberg Foundation gave the project a $50 million grant to match local private funds to improve schools, and Ayers fought to bring the grant to Chicago, according to participants and project records.


The project's organizing committee asked Obama to serve as the board chairman in 1995. Annenberg Project Executive Director Ken Rollings said Ayers was not a member of that ad hoc group when the decision was made.


For seven years, Ayers and Obama -- among many others -- worked on funding for education projects, including some projects advocated by Ayers...."


This is all interconnected regardless what you may say. Now take a little time and understand Chicago politics and connections between the supporters of Obama to get a grasp what it actually means, and you can look at how Kennedy got elected in '60 too if it is confusing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
And tell us how you feel about the ramifications of your demonstrations, that it was those very demonstrations that emboldened a dejected North Korea to continue fighting just as they were about to give up (their words, not mine) and the fact that those actions enabled Pol Pot to assume power and kill millions of people? Or do you absolve yourself of having anything to do with any of that?

Turtle, the end justifies the means. Um like man the dude went to jail. How righteous is that! Plus like how far out is it when one bro and his friends can end a war, or police action or conflict or something; man.

I took strong a position it was wrong,took to the streets,went to jail for a while,and helped end the ****ed thing.I was not doing anything but being a good American who was fed up with an unjust war that happened to take the lives of 50,000 of my generations best.I don't care who started it,me and my friends ended it. Power to the people.

Right on!

Until then,I guess I'm still that old 60's radical fightn' the good battle for truth,justice and the American way. Sorry if it bores you.

Yea I guess that puts your whole position into prospective.
 

DougTravels

Not a Member
If you google "factcheck.org bias" you will see numerous claims that it is biased from BOTH the right and left. The recent thread I started about misclaims from Obama was from there as well.
Recently it checked out a claim that Bush and Cheny had lied about WMD's in Iraq and found that to be mostly non truths.

I find the site to be pretty balanced in their reports.

Take it as you will, arguing with people who are clutching their duck guns in fear and those blaming Carter for Iraq and those who state that 60 plus percent of her verdicts are overturned is getting a little futile.

You guys just keep spinning your little half truths (half! that is generous) if it makes you feel superior in some small minded way.
 
Top