No need, really, since we can see it for ourselves.
I shouldn't have written "we" in my opening statement. I should've wrote, "I will spell it out for Turtle and anyone else who may share his views in my so-called
"bromance".
You might want to exclude your "we" and "ourselves", in your above statement, since you are the only that cannot comprehend what the word means or its intended use.
Looks like I'm living rent free in your head, too.
Not at all. Nice attempt at deflection though.
Well, now that you know the correct definition of the word "Bromance" and the correct context in which it should be used, I hope I might have saved you the embarassment in the future when you are attempting to be funny by using the word
"Bromance".
Some jokes work, some don't. That's the way it goes.
It is safe to say that joke didn't work.
I'm glad you agree with me.
SO you are, in effect, preaching to the choir.
NO, I am not preaching to the choir. We both know what that means and if you were being truthful and not trying to prove a point, where this isn't point to be proven, you would not even think about making that comment. Especially if I am backing it up with facts to counter Becks words. I did make the mistake of quoting Beck's words without showing the facts in this particular thread, in which I apologized for doing so.
Even if you are correct, so what?
When allegations, statements, shared values, shared views mirror Becks, then I am not only disputing what is being said I am also showing the credibility of those that agree with him or those that may employ the man. How can anyone honestly think that Beck or FoxNews(his employer) has any integrity at all.
Followed closely by those who repost his misinformation to Web forums.
C'mon Turtle. You really aren't that dense are you. My posts of Becks words always are followed up by facts disputing his misinformation.
No, I get it. You read Beck's stuff and it drives you crazy, and you then use this forum to vent your frustration. My advice would be to quit watching, listening to and reading Beck's stuff.
It does upset me that so many believe what Beck has to say. Not only do they believe it, they take it as the Gospel Truth. Once again, there are some here in the Soapbox that fit that description above(they know who they are). I am only including Becks words, as Sister Sarah would say, to
refudiate his propaganda by using his own words against him.
But if I reposted stuff here every time I disagreed with it, Lawrence would have to buy a couple more servers just to hold it all.
It is not so much that I disagree, it is that I feel it becomes worthy to post things that are out right, bold face lies that Beck and others like him spout every single day. He gives a lot of material to dispute or prove wrong. If he was a nobody, it wouldn't matter andwe wouldn't be here talking about him. Face it Turtle, Beck and the others like him, that I have mentioned over and over have influence and their words mean something and when those words are lies they not only mean something they may have grave consequences.
Rather than pointing out every time Beck twists the truth, it's better to assume that he does it all the time, and just stick with pointing out all the times he's truthful.
If I didn't point out that he or others were twisting the truth or lying, others would be in here passing those twisted truths to the other members and possibly believing those twisted truths and lies. You and a few others that
post in the
Soapbox know or have the desire to look for the truth and do not believe everything you hear.
If you restrict your posts about Beck in that manner, people won't think you've got a Beck bromance.
Dude, seriously, give it up. Use a different adjective describing this
phenomenon if you will, just make it relevant please.
