Then why are the Dems trying so hard, and for so long, to manufacture something to nail Trump with?
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
Wait. Wait. Wait. WHAT?!?
The Democrats have been screaming impeachment since before Trump was sworn in. And not for anything he did while he was president before be was even inaugurated. They've been screaming impeachment since before the inauguration because they can't accept the results of the election and want to reverse the outcome. Period. Fini. End of story.
Clinton was impeached (quite stupidly and unnecessarily, in my opinion), because of actual crimes he was found to have committed, including crimes he finally admitted to, such as lying to a grand jury. There was (were?) 11 counts from the Star Report on which Clinton was impeached.
How many criminal counts were in the Mueller Report on Trump? I forget. Oh, yeah, I remember. ZERO.
At this point the Dems are going to try and impeach Trump on a laundry list of what-ifs and might-coulds, any one of which falls apart when looked at closely, and collectively they're still nothing more than zero times zero. They're so desperate that Adam Schiff said if the Executive Branch go to court to contest any of the subpoenas, the Executive Branch is guilty of obstruction of justice.
In other words, Schiff says, "If you don't do what I want, say what I want you to say, you're obstructing muh authoritay!"
I'm old enough to remember when potential violations of the Logan Act used to be a thing.
For those of us old enough to have witnessed the Watergate scandal, it's easy to conclude that the current smearing of Trump comes nowhere close to that event.
Nixon's public approval dropped to the point where 57% of the public believed he should be removed from office. Not only did he lose the support of his base, but he also lost the backing of influential Republicans in the House and Senate. This came as a result of damning evidence presented in open, televised hearings that exposed real high crimes and misdemeanors.
Today, the Democrats have nothing that approaches impeachable offenses against Trump. His base is solidly behind him and the Senate will not vote to remove him from office. Schiff's antics are nothing more than political theater without an audience.
www.pewresearch.org
Nixon's public approval dropped to the point where 57% of the public believed he should be removed from office. Not only did he lose the support of his base, but he also lost the backing of influential Republicans in the House and Senate. This came as a result of damning evidence presented in open, televised hearings that exposed real high crimes and misdemeanors.
Today, the Democrats have nothing that approaches impeachable offenses against Trump. His base is solidly behind him and the Senate will not vote to remove him from office. Schiff's antics are nothing more than political theater without an audience.
From the archives: How the Watergate crisis eroded public support for Richard Nixon
In this 2014 post, we explore how Americans’ views of former president Richard Nixon shifted negative amid the Watergate scandal.
www.pewresearch.org
I didn't watch that game. Can you post a link to a video?
True. The Trump rally in Minneapolis drew people from as far away as Winnipeg, MB. Very few of the attendees were locals from the 7 county metro area.
Whatever entity that oversees the operation of National's Park controls access to the audience. National's Park prohibits guns on the premises so there were very few Trump supporters. The Trump supporters that were in attendance flew in from Texas and had to leave their guns at home.
I guess Trump won't be in Milwaukee next summer. He'll have to watch the Democratic National Convention on television.
And that is exactly why the Democrats suddenly wanted to do away with the Electoral College.
Attachments
World Series Boob Flasher Julia Rose Rips Topless Double Standard, Men Can Do It!
TMZ Sports spoke with the 3 women who bared their breasts at the World Series -- they're claiming a gender double standard!
www.tmz.com
I can’t find any unedited videos but those were some nice boobies!!!!!
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Sally Yates Michael Flynn
The IG report and the probable Grand Jury indictments are on the horizon. Add to that the imploding narrative of this Ukraine thing. Not looking good.
Nolte: Tom Brokaw Admits Democrats Lack 'the Goods' to Impeach Trump
Tom Brokaw told a disappointed Andrea Mitchell that Democrats do not have "the goods" to impeach President Trump.
www.breitbart.com
I guess the "whistleblower" and Mr Vindman didn't have an issue with this at the time:
nypost.com
This smart home fitness device helps keep your motivation up
Change the way you move with 500+ workouts.
nypost.com
An op-ed in the New York Post.....may as well been Faux News.I guess the "whistleblower" and Mr Vindman didn't have an issue with this at the time:
View attachment 19507
This smart home fitness device helps keep your motivation up
Change the way you move with 500+ workouts.
Now do the NYTimes.
Democracy Dies in the Barkness
Trump tweets a "fake" photo (A.K.A. hilarious meme) from the Daily Wire... and the Washington Post, New York Times and others went into "Fact Check Frenzy Mode" to determine if A), Trump really and truly awarded a paw medal to a dog, and B), if not, then why would the President try and fool the entire world that he had by using a doctored photo.
The NYT even went as far as contacting James C. McCloughan, a retired Army medic who was awarded the Medal of Honor in the original photo. They were looking for his reaction to such an outrageous and scandalous depiction of his ceremony. He said that he interpreted it as Mr. Trump recognizing the dog’s heroism, and that he certainly was not offended and laughed when he compared the two images. Unlike the Left, Mr. McCloughan can recognize humor when he sees it.
Meanwhile, the same media were able to keep the identity of the "whistleblower" under wraps for weeks.