You can post your own personal information all you want, but you cannot violate someone else's privacy by posting personal information about them.So I should remove my personal assertion? Ok, no problem.
You can post your own personal information all you want, but you cannot violate someone else's privacy by posting personal information about them.So I should remove my personal assertion? Ok, no problem.
That's the kind of crap that's gonna get you banned, dood. So don't be surprised when it happens.To be so small, and act so big.
That's the kind of crap that's gonna get you banned, dood. So don't be surprised when it happens.
Not really. The Code of Conduct is very clear. About what is and is not acceptable, and about what will get you banned if you violate it. It's not like we're making this stuff up as we go. Everyone has read and agreed to the same set of rules.Threats.........!
Not really. The Code of Conduct is very clear. About what is and is not acceptable, and about what will get you banned if you violate it. It's not like we're making this stuff up as we go. Everyone has read and agreed to the same set of rules.
Windsor, the issue was with talking about another individual and details of their life. It was an issue of other peoples personal things being discussed. Not his opinion on business items. A lot of people were upset by the post and felt it crossed the personal line. I honestly agreed.
the drop off on weekends that has taken place this yr is the cause of a whole hosts of reasons not just one. Most of us understand that.
That's the kind of crap that's gonna get you banned, dood. So don't be surprised when it happens.
I didn't like the post, but I didn't do anything until the complaints started rolling in, because I don't believe he did it in a malicious manner. But once the legitimate complaints were lodged, I really had no choice but to do something. What I did was, I edited his post to remove the offending text. That's all I did.I personally didn't like the post either.
No, it doesn't justify being banned. And if he's banned, that won't be why. Because I didn't think he did it maliciously, I didn't even give him an official Warning, much less an Infraction Point. I simply edited out the offending text and figured we'd just move on and be done with it. Cuz had other ideas, however, and immediately proceeded to to do things that got him 2 Infraction Points and is now the subject of discussion of being banned.The only thing in my opinion that was wrong "and I know my opinion don't mean anything on EO" was that he used his name. The J...... Thing is a very touchy subject and I get it. But it sure don't justify someone being banned.
Whether we personally agree or disagree with a post is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is what the Code of Conduct says.The only thing personal about his post "weather we disagree with it or not" is that you personally didn't like it.
He named an individual, then went on to tell how the individual had a problem and he should have been helped and sponsored. That's a pretty gross violation of someone's privacy, and is a serious violation of the Code of Conduct.I understand I just didn't see what "rule" was broken is what I'm saying.
If that were even a little bit true, you wouldn't be here now.He has been Dying to get me off of here for years now.
Prison Rules are rules imposed on prisoners who don't have a choice in the matter. The EO Code of Conduct is a set of rules that everyone agrees to in order to receive forum posting privileges.I'm very opinionated and that doesn't mix well with this site and it's never ending "code of conduct" which is comparable to a set of Prison Rules.
Yes, really! Would you like a third one?For instance, I was given "2" infractions yesterday by the shelled one because I stepped on the line, Really!
I didn't like the post, but I didn't do anything until the complaints started rolling in, because I don't believe he did it in a malicious manner. But once the legitimate complaints were lodged, I really had no choice but to do something. What I did was, I edited his post to remove the offending text. That's all I did.
No, it doesn't justify being banned. And if he's banned, that won't be why. Because I didn't think he did it maliciously, I didn't even give him an official Warning, much less an Infraction Point. I simply edited out the offending text and figured we'd just move on and be done with it. Cuz had other ideas, however, and immediately proceeded to to do things that got him 2 Infraction Points and is now the subject of discussion of being banned.
Whether we personally agree or disagree with a post is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is what the Code of Conduct says.
He named an individual, then went on to tell how the individual had a problem and he should have been helped and sponsored. That's a pretty gross violation of someone's privacy, and is a serious violation of the Code of Conduct.
The severity of the violation determines what happens. You may just get a post or a PM asking you not to do that again, you may get an Official Warning, you may get an Infraction Point, or you may get banned.
For example, if you violate this...
9. No posting of personal information
Please respect the privacy of others and do not post information such as phone numbers and addresses.
...you're probably gonna get in trouble.
And, if you violate this...
16. Editing or Reposting of Moderated Posts
If an Administrator or Moderator edits or removes a post, members may not edit the Moderated text in any way or repost the removed posts. Doing so may result in the member being banned from the forums.
...you're gonna get in big trouble.