Then the trump supporter says on camera that if he's sees the guy again he's going to kill him.
First... If you're gonna get all riled up about something, it might as well be about the truth, right? The Trump supporter did NOT say that
if he's sees the guy again he's going to kill him (which is a specific threat, and a felony). The guy who was sucker punched, Rakeem Jones, stated that he and four of his friends - a “diverse” group that included two black men (including Jones), a white woman, a Muslim, and a third black man, a gay man - had gone to the rally as a “social experiment.” He said the woman with them first started the shouting once Trump’s speech began, and he and the other quickly joined in to see what kind of reactions they could get from Trump and the crowd.
They were shouting obscenities at Trump and at the crowd. Things like "F Trump" and "Trump ain't s**t", "You ain't s**t", and the ever popular "F YOU!" among many others. That's why they were being escorted out by the Sheriff's deputies. On their way out, just as he reached the sucker puncher, he turned around and gave the finger to the crowd and cut loose one last "F YOU!" That's when 78-year-old John McGraw gave Jones an elbow to the side of the head.
When a Cracker Jack reporter on the scene asked McGraw if he liked the event, to which McGraw replied, "You bet I liked it." The reporter followed up with, "Yeah? What did you like about it?" McGraw replied, "Knocking the Hell outta that big mouth."
When asked if he knew who the man was, McGraw replied, "We don't know who he is, but he's not acting like an American." Then, after a video cut, we hear Mr Cracker Jack ask, "So he deserved it?" To which McGraw replies, "Ever bit of it." Then, "What was that?" the reporter asked, and McGraw reiterated, "Yes he deserved it. The next time we see him we might have to kill him..." and that's where the audio, and usually the video, gets cut, as if McGraw had a period after "him."
But what he says is, "The next time we see him we might have to kill him, we don't know who he is, he might be with a terrorist organization. ISIS? I don't know."
So, "The next time we see him we might have to kill him [becasue] we don't know who he is, he might be with a terrorist organization," is a VERY different statement from "If I see the guy again I'm going to kill him."
People are responsible for their own actions (well, except liberals, they can always blame someone else), and McGraw was arrested and charged, just as he should have been. I still maintain that if you go someplace as an antagonizer specifically to antagonize others explicitly to provoke a reaction, you deserve whatever reaction you have risked in provoking.
In response to the incident, the person many people want to be the next President, Hillary Clinton, in fine Constitutionally ignorant and liberal blame-someone-else fashion stated, "You know, you don't make America great by, you know, dumping on everything that made America great, like freedom of speech and assembly and, you know, the right of people to protest."
She actually thinks Trump is to blame for the protester's actions, not the protesters themselves, and she thinks the right of free speech, and the right of assembly, and the right to protest, extends into a private venue.
Obama was speaking at a White House event honoring LGBT Pride Month last year and had a protester (a trangender Latina) start yelling at him about something or another. He scolded her with, "You're in my house, it's disrespecfull, shame on you. You don't come into a place invited and..." She kept on, the assembled crowd drowned her out with chants of "Oh-Bah-Mah, Oh-Bah-Mah" and he had security kick her out.
Hillary didn't say a word. Not about freedom of speech. Not about freedom to protest. Nothing.
