over 9 years in a cargo van now....there is no good reason for 50 cent freight ..absolutely none...
BWAHAHA !!!
You're kidding right OVM ? ..... ya jus' gotta be ....
There is
absolutely a good reason for it - well actually, two:
1. First and foremost:
Competition
2. Secondly: Owners/Drivers that are
stupid enough to run for that amount.
any carriers offering up this rate should be shot and pizzed on....unless you requested to go home and something came up to get you there....or out of a deadzone.....
Bzzzzt -
wrong target - and here's why:
You can't blame the carrier for responding to market forces and doing what they have to do to compete - one would assume that they
are not bidding loads below a level where they can be profitable - if even only marginally.
You could say (and I would) that offering loads to their leased O/O's where the O/O's are no longer profitable isn't real wise ... it definitely ain't in the longterm - because it will result in higher turnover (and the expenses attendant with that) .... and it could eventually cause your company to be known for only having "cheap freight" ....... at that point you are gonna likely have a recruitment problem.
But in the short-term, if it's a question of the company's survival - versus some of their O/O's - there is little doubt what I would do were I a company manager - some O/O's would fail and go by the wayside ... but hopefully my company would perhaps live to fight another day.
That is the rather
brutal economic reality of it these days.
but to run it as a matter of everyday running no sir...nope it will just run you into the ground...I didn't make it this long by running .50 cent loads.
Yup - I'm sure you didn't.
And with your comments directly above, you hit the nail on the head - the problem isn't with the company
offering, as much as it's with an O/O or driver
accepting ...... that is where the responsibility ultimately lies.
FWIW, I was offered an 800+ mile load today ..... I really would liked to have the miles - but I turned it down because the rate was too low (it was well above .50 cpm tho') ..... plus I wasn't all that keen on where it was going (although in the big scheme of things where it went probably would have been fine, if not ideal) .... and I've been out in the southwest (TX, AZ, NM) for several weeks now .... where triple digit temps are a daily occurrence

(I actually think I'm starting to like it .... sick, I know

)
I really, really don't like turning down loads - I want to service my carrier - but I'm not a charity either.
The load got covered and another driver accepted it - at the rate I turned it down at. I took one he turned down earlier in the week -
but I ran that load for significantly more than what he was originally offered to run it.
Funny thing about him taking that load today .... I spent a considerable amount of time with the guy who ultimately took that load, over the last week or so (both here and in Laredo) ...... and he talked about how people with other sources of income than expedite (I am one, but he didn't know it at the time) were screwing things up for the other folks ..... because they would accept lower rates since they didn't "need" the money .... too funny.
And then he goes and accepts this load at that rate (one that he had previously claimed was "way too cheap") ..... largely because he is
desperate for the income.
I really don't want to see anyone fail, but on the otherhand I have no doubt whatsoever his exit from this business (and others like him) will enhance my and others situations with respect to load pay.
I dunno whether I would say the carriers are the problem, as much as I would say the O/O's and drivers are ...... I've met some real lu-lu's out here ... that's for sure ....
I could tell ya about
another one I met out here in the last week or so (not with my carrier) ... but I'm sure you get the idea .....
