As long as that Russian expediter didn't also appear anywhere and with anyone remotely connected to someone who knows someone who happened to be a Trump supporter, you fine.
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
Future developments may prove me wrong but I don't think much will come out of yesterday's revelation that Cohen said Hannity is one of his clients and Hannity denied any such relationship. With his denial, Hannity waived any attorney/client privilege that may have otherwise existed between the two. He would not likely do that if the Cohen records that were seized included something that was Hannity-incriminating.
Be careful about assuming that just because someone is a Democrat he or she thinks in a certain way or has certain motives. I know it's easy intellectual shorthand to label people and make partisan assumptions but doing so can often lead you to wrong conclusions.
For example, consider a female attorney who is a registered Democrat and has contributed $2,000 to a female Democrat U.S. Senator who is a flaming critic of Trump and has posted fierce anti-Trump tweets. Would you guess that such an attorney is anti-Trump or pro-Trump? If someone told you Trump would be well served if he hired that attorney to represent his best interests in court, would you agree?
Trump agrees. This attorney is Joanna Hendon, the woman Trump recently hired to represent him in court yesterday regarding the seized Cohen records.
Last edited:
I think he admitted in interview that his wife has input with him, so it's more about peer pressure (wife and all her friends) that may have influence on Comey.
Comey will be on the View , Wednesday...
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
John Schindler got into some trouble in 2014 ,,,some inappropriate picture he sent, so he resigned his job at the Naval War College..........stuff happens.
Is this analyst a kook? Asking before I bother to read the article.
Most analysts are kooks. The job itself is a grunt-level position, a research job performed at a desk in a cubicle. NSA Analyst, CIA Analysis. Sounds kewl, but it's really little more than grunt research trying to piece together information about shopping habits and Ukrainian ethnography. You know how in the movies some nail-biting crisis happens and the office nerd goes, "I"m just an analyst, not a field agent!" and then manages to to save the world. Yeah, that never happens. The average shelf life of an intelligence analysts is 3 years, because they get into it because of the movies, then quickly realize it's more like taking trash from the fuel islands to the dumpster at a truck stop. Its important work, somebody's gotta do it, but it ain't all that it's cracked up to be. It does allow you to tell people that you are a former spy, even though you weren't.
In this case, this particular former spy lost his adjunct professor job at the Navy War College because his social media dick pics escaped into the wild.
So the article is fine. It's just one yahoo's opinion, no better or worse than any other's opinion, with no special insight or knowledge.
Reminds me of sombody..... can't remember his name....... guess I'll go duck hunting now.
Nannygate and Judge Kimba woods,,,awhile back she is the Judge for the Cohen case.
Nannygate (disambiguation) - Wikipedia Its gonna be a long summer...
Nannygate (disambiguation) - Wikipedia Its gonna be a long summer...
It's a nothingburger regarding Hannity. It's not even about Russian collusion. It's about sifting thru Cohen's stuff to get to Trump.
Ruh-roh ...
Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
To borrow a phrase from someone: It's possible this story may be true. However this cute little story by McClatchy hasn't been independently corroborated by other news organizations It just sits there all by its lonesome self. Lol
Last edited:
He admitted he paid him (while also denying it in the previous breath ...)
There’s something hinky about his whole story on his relationship with Cohen ... and his failure to disclose it.
Why was he hiding it from his audience ?
Been widely noted and commented on, on the left and the right.
Depends on what else is there (if anything) ... and whether or not it comes out.
Well, self-admittedly, you’re not really all that well informed on it ...
Where did you see him acknowledge he was paying him for legal services? That would be significant. I haven't seen that anywhere. Anyone else?
But at least you’re honest about it ...
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
