The worst thing that could possibly happen to the Tea Party movement is not that Obama and those on the extreme left would deride them and attempt to marginalize them (successfully) - although that's certainly bad enough .....
it's the fact that the entire movement could be subverted by ostensibly by the fringe neo-con right and the "establishment" Republican party itself .... possibly as expressed by the sentiments below (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here chef

):
.... if this continues, and i don't see it not, nov isn't going to be pretty for the dems...the key is to vet those that run and to make sure that they are Real Conservatives and not just Rino's.......that will be a bit tougher...
Most folks (including many here I'm sure) don't even realize what the actual origins of the modern day Tea Party movement were - they came out of political activity that resulted as a consequence of Ron Paul's candidacy for President:
Ron Paul raises millions in today's Boston Tea Party event
Paul supporters hold Tea Party re-enactment in Boston
Ron Paul's tea party for dollars
Statement on Ron Paul and “Tax Day Tea Parties”
It was
a broad-based, libertarian, populist, movement that was comprised of folks, nominally
from both sides of the political spectrum, which generally are not at the ideological extremes - as a consequence, it represents the views of the vast majority of the American people.
Some, seeing the broad appeal, did not fail to take notice ..... and decided they wanted a piece of the action:
Video: Sarah Palin on "The Tea Party Takover"
Of course, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery ....
unless those imitating you are seeking to subvert and destroy what you are doing.
There is alot of evidence that such subversion is actually already occurring (Texas Governor Rick Perry, Sean Hannity, Ron Paul being politically targeted by the Republican Party, etc), and if this is allowed to occur,
it will absolutely be the death of the movement - because,
being untrue to the original ideals, it will no longer hold the broad-based appeal that the movement originally had, and which made it so dynamic and vital .
It is really no surprise that both the Democratic or Republican parties would seek to co-opt the movement -
since it is a threat to their power. One (Democratic Party) seeks to co-opt it by attacking what the movement stands for directly and attempting to redefine and cast it as something it is not (ie. fringe, loonies, hate-mongers, etc.) .... and the other (Republican Party) seeks to co-opt it by infiltrating the movement and perverting the original agenda into a bunch of crap that has nothing to with the original movement, but that closely mirrors their own agenda.
Whether the movement remains (with altered goals and purposes)
as a de facto organ of the Republican Party ..... or just simply goes by the wayside and disintegrates as a consequence of no longer having the broad appeal that it originally had, the Republican Party would win - and so would the Democratic Party - because it would serve to preserve their power.
One should never assume that simply because something
is named or called ______,
that it is, in actual fact, ______