Obama Calls for $50 Billion Spending Boost

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
As Xiggi brought up in another thread:

Obama Calls for $50 Billion Spending Boost

Posted on September 6, 2010 at 9:36am
Scott Baker
Obama Calls for $50 Billion Spending Boost | The Blaze

Obama is also continuing to prod the Senate to pass the small business bill that calls for about $12 billion in tax breaks and a $30 billion fund to help unfreeze lending.

What barry and his useful idiots continue to ignore is that, "tax cuts" are going to get small business to hire anyone when they DON'T NEED WORKERS because there are no sales...and any moneies given to banks will be saved by then, not loaded out jusst as has happened the last time around....

small business needs to kniw they are not going to get killed by "cap and tax" and "barrycare" before they are going to invest again....

WASHINGTON (AP) — Vowing to find new ways to stimulate the sputtering economy, President Barack Obama will call for long-term investments in the nation’s roads, railways and runways that would cost at least $50 billion.
The infrastructure investments are one part of a package of targeted proposals the White House is expected to announce in hopes of jump-starting the economy ahead of the November election. Obama will outline the infrastructure proposal Monday at a Labor Day event in Milwaukee.

While the proposal calls for investments over six years, the White House said spending would be front-loaded with an initial $50 billion to help create jobs in the near future.

The goals of the infrastructure plan include: rebuilding 150,000 miles of roads; constructing and maintaining 4,000 miles of railways, enough to go coast-to-coast; and rehabilitating or reconstructing 150 miles of airport runways, while also installing a new air navigation system designed to reduce travel times and delays.

Obama will also call for the creation of a permanent infrastructure bank that would focus on funding national and regional infrastructure projects.

Administration officials wouldn’t say what the total cost of the infrastructure investments would be, but did say the initial $50 billion represents a significant percentage. Officials said the White House would consider closing a number of special tax breaks for oil and gas companies to pay for the proposal.

Obama made infrastructure investments a central part of the $814 billion stimulus Congress passed last year, but with that spending winding down, the economy’s growth has slowed. Officials said this infrastructure package differs from the stimulus because it’s aimed at long-term growth, while still focusing on creating jobs in the short-term.



In a Labor Day interview on CBS’ “Early Show,” Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said the plan Obama was to unveil Monday would “put construction workers, welders, electricians back to work … folks that have been unemployed for a long time.”

With the unemployment rate ticking up to 9.6 percent, and polls showing the midterm elections could be dismal for Democrats, the president has promised to unveil a series of new measures on the economy.

In addition to Monday’s announcement in Milwaukee, Obama will travel to Cleveland Wednesday to pitch a $100 billion proposal to increase and make permanent research and development tax credits for businesses, a White House official said.

While the idea is popular in Congress, coming up with offsetting tax increases or spending cuts has been a stumbling block. Similar to his proposal to pay for the infrastructure investments, Obama will ask lawmakers to close tax breaks for oil and gas companies and multinational corporations to pay for the plan.

Other stimulus measures the administration is considering include extending a law passed in March that exempts companies that hire unemployed workers from paying Social Security taxes on those workers through December. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has proposed extending the exemption an additional six months.

Obama is also continuing to prod the Senate to pass the small business bill that calls for about $12 billion in tax breaks and a $30 billion fund to help unfreeze lending. Republicans have likened the bill to the unpopular bailout of the financial industry. And the president wants to make permanent the portion of George W. Bush’s tax cuts affecting the middle class.

Wary of the public’s concern over rising deficits, the administration insists a second stimulus plan, similar to last year’s $814 billion bill, is not in the works.
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
The truth is that this is what tax money should be spent on..Roads, rail, the electric grid, and other infrastructure. It's just a shame so much more has been squandered on nonsense. They should have done this a long time ago...
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The truth is that this is what tax money should be spent on..Roads, rail, the electric grid, and other infrastructure. It's just a shame so much more has been squandered on nonsense. They should have done this a long time ago...


It is NOT the function of government to build rail or the electric grid. That is for private industry to do. I am not even sure about roads other than the Interstate Defense Highway system.

I don't want Obama's view of how the electric grid should be improved. His ideas make the grid far more vunerable to EMP attacks, either natural or man made.

The government will mess things up. Require stupid things, like rail systems that will always lose money. What about, sustainable neighborhoods? You want the government involved in every aspect of how we live? Scares the tar out of me. Sound like Europe where everything is controlled, taxes kill enterprise and freedom is dead.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Just think Amtrak and you already know the success of this goofy plan.
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
On the contrary Mr. Shooter, just the opposite. Give me good roads and quality rail for both private and public transportation,, electricity that works when I need it to, clean water and sewer. I need a strong, empowered police department that doesn't have it's hands tied, and an efficient fire department, complete with a competent EMS, and then GET OUT OF MY WAY! IMHO opinion, this IS what my tax dollars should be spent on. Not much else. I don't see how you can misconstrue this as giving the government control over you or me...
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
So the government should not build cars, provide banking services, help fund housing purchases, or produce electricity?

What kind of ****** country do you want?

I sat at the RR crossing waiting for an amtrak train to clear the switch and go on its merry way, there was 6 cars and two engines with I would say 10 people on board. It wasn't one of these cheap trains either but a gussied up stainless steel job that cost a lot of money.

Now I understand this is not the "train usin'" group of people in my area like in the north east but why should there be any investment made in any rail system when I can go to chicago from Detroit cheaper on a privatly owned bus than I can take the train from Birmingham to Dearborn?

They are again (for the fifth time) a fast rail system along Woodward and Gratiot, both are useless when you come down to it - you start in the downtown area, go through the war zone and then up to another mess - the suburbs.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
It will still be a expanded Amtrak. If they can't get that right, why on earth would one want to invest more money in a totally mismanaged adventure that is the same thing?
Gee maybe we should pump billions in the postal service to expand the electrical grid. :rolleyes:
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
On the contrary Mr. Shooter, just the opposite. Give me good roads and quality rail for both private and public transportation,, electricity that works when I need it to, clean water and sewer. I need a strong, empowered police department that doesn't have it's hands tied, and an efficient fire department, complete with a competent EMS, and then GET OUT OF MY WAY! IMHO opinion, this IS what my tax dollars should be spent on. Not much else. I don't see how you can misconstrue this as giving the government control over you or me...


NONE of what you say we need is the business of the FEDERAL government. Rail and electricity is the business of PRIVATE industry ONLY. Same with MOST roads and bridges. You seem to be wanting to GIVE power to the Federal Government that is NOT theirs under the Constitution.

Control? Do you really believe that ALL this money will not come with strings the size of ropes attached? The ONLY way to get this money will be to knuckle under to some weird idea that Obama and Co. think this country should look like.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I am puzzled, the government does these great things but can't seem to do the simplist.

Back in the 1820's

Back in the early 1800's the governement didn't build the canal system, they were bickering and some guy with some money built the Erie Canal without their help.

In the 1827 the government didn't build the first rail system, that was a couple guys who saw the need for it. Within 10 years, there was a big surge of rail systems in the country, and along with that the telegraph was put in place thanks to these people.

In the 1860's the government didn't link the east with the west but several men who wanted to get rich got involved and challenged each other to do it, they did.

The government didn't build the first flight sustainable aeroplane, it was two private individuals who had a dream - does the government even dream?

BUT in the past century, we have seen a lot of changes, the government tried to take control of all the utilities, told people what to plant and what not to plant, took over a large percentage rail through regulation and subsidies and left the country in ruins.

If Obama wasn't so much in thinking money solves all these problems, then he could realize that the $50B he wants to spend is better spent on the people themselves - give the nation a tax break for the rest of the year and see what happens.
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
If income tax is not for such things, I ask you what income tax is for... Or are you saying there should be no tax at all?
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
They did not build the electric grid, invent the telephone or just about anything.

They are NOT responsible for fire fighting (local), state or local law enforcement. Local water or sewage. Get the idea? Private industry does this better. The Federal government is NOT capable of doing these things in a fast, cost effective manner. Everything will be bogged down by politics. Example: Local police NOT being able to enforce ALL laws that they are required to enforce, strictly for political reasons. Immigration law comes to mind.

The Federal Government MUST be cut down to size. Back to what is allowed under the Constitution. Has education got worse or better since the Feds got involved?
 
Top