Apply Now!

Makes me Kinda Wonder

P

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
With the Idiot in Power in Iran, I'm just wondering if he is Planning dropping a Nuke on our Troops in Afghanistan and Iraq! Especially with the "Pant Load" in Chief Pushing his No Nukes in Other Countries as well as the U.S.A. That would be Devastating! Iran already said that they Have "Some" Nuclear Bombs but wouldn't disclose as to How many They Had..

Any Input On This? :eek:
 
chefdennis

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
I believe "iamadumbazz" in iran has "small" nuke weapons that they have gotten from russia, but not warheads, more in the line with "dirty bombs".....

now anything that they are "refining" to weapons grade for nuke warheads i don't believe is enough to build more then 2 maybe 3.....so i don't see them using them until they can build a "stockpile" so that if and when they use them, they will still have others held back to use as a deterent of anyone else nuking them......

just my thoughts, and with "iamadumbazz" in charge over there and him and the "supreme leader" both being religiious "extremeist"...and barry over here being a complete waste.....they could do anything......
 
Last edited:
RLENT

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Poorboy said:
With the Idiot in Power in Iran, I'm just wondering if he is Planning dropping a Nuke on our Troops in Afghanistan and Iraq!
Click to expand...
Too much caffeine today ?

Poorboy said:
Especially with the "Pant Load" in Chief Pushing his No Nukes in Other Countries as well as the U.S.A. That would be Devastating!
Click to expand...
Yeah ... ridding the entire world of nuclear weapons .... that would really be horrible ...... :rolleyes:

Poorboy said:
Iran already said that they Have "Some" Nuclear Bombs but wouldn't disclose as to How many They Had..
Click to expand...
Hmmmm .... care to cite any (halfway reputable) source for that ?

Poorboy said:
Any Input On This? :eek:
Click to expand...
Yes - there is only one country in the history of the entire world that has ever used nuclear weapons against an enemy (indeed, against a civilian population)

Considering that whole "karma", "what-goes-around-comes-around", and "those-that-live-by-the-sword-die-by-the-sword" thing you should be worried .... very worried ..... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
P

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
RLENT said:
Too much caffeine today ?


Yeah ... ridding the entire world of nuclear weapons .... that would really be horrible ...... :rolleyes:


Hmmmm .... care to cite any (halfway reputable) source for that ?


Yes - there is only one country in the history of the entire world that has ever used nuclear weapons against an enemy (indeed, against a civilian population)

Considering that whole "karma", "what-goes-around-comes-around", and "those-that-live-by-the-sword-die-by-the-sword" thing you should be worried .... very worried ..... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It was Brought up Yesterday and All I Did was Ask a Question, But Here Goes: No, Not too Much Caffeine, It was Brought up on the Radio Yesterday, And the Source was WSPD Radio In Toledo!
And He's NOT Going to Rid the World of Nuclear Weapons No Matter How Much Rhetoric he Spews, Remember the Old Saying that When Guns are Outlawed then Only Outlaws Will Have Guns, That would be the Case here but in a Much Larger Scale! I Can see N.Korea and Iran Giving up Their Nukes Because The Messiah Asks them To--Yeah Right:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
greg334

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Why are you worried about Iran?

he isn't in charge of the country, he is a figure head and only a figure head.

This administration has already said they want unilateral solutions for NK and Iran right from day one but yet to understand what Bush and others were trying to do. We didn't go into talks without other people at the table then and now that Obama is in office his arrogance has indicated he wants to ignore the work done and move forward with "peace".

Beside, our own arrogance has been a problem too. How can anyone take us seriously with our demands for peace when we ignore our allies and make unreasonable demands on them. I would think our best course is to sit quietly for a bit, put a muzzle on Hillary and then talk properly to all involved without the "I am the messiah" attitude.
 
layoutshooter

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I like nukes!! They have prevented major wars! They will continue to do so unless they are in the hands of true "nut cases".

I am glad we nuked Japan, I most likely would have never been born. Nor would untold numbers of American and Japanese people alive today. The death toll from an invasion of the "main island" would have been far greater than the result of the nukes. We asked them several times, through multiple paths to surrender, they did not. Just look at the battle for Okinawa, that would have paled if we had to attack the main island. (based on history, interviews with Japanese officials after the war, AND, talking with Japanese people when I lived there. Many of whom were of the same opinion)

I am NOT worried about a straight up nuke attack from Iran or North Korea. That is NOT what they are planning and testing for. They ARE planning and testing for a "EMP" attack, which would be FAR more devistating than a "normal" air burst attack. But hey, what do I know about nukes and their uses?

Experience is of no value.:rolleyes:
 
P

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
greg334 said:
Why are you worried about Iran?

he isn't in charge of the country, he is a figure head and only a figure head.

This administration has already said they want unilateral solutions for NK and Iran right from day one but yet to understand what Bush and others were trying to do. We didn't go into talks without other people at the table then and now that Obama is in office his arrogance has indicated he wants to ignore the work done and move forward with "peace".

Beside, our own arrogance has been a problem too. How can anyone take us seriously with our demands for peace when we ignore our allies and make unreasonable demands on them. I would think our best course is to sit quietly for a bit, put a muzzle on Hillary and then talk properly to all involved without the "I am the messiah" attitude.
Click to expand...

Oh But I Do Worry about Iran, They are in the Perfect Location to wipe out a Large Portion of Our Troops. I am also Aware that As Chef Calls Him: Iamadumbazz is Only a Puppet But The Grand Poobah or whatever they Call Him over there is His Puppet Master and is Also about a French Fry short of a Happy Meal Can Pull His Puppets Strings anytime he wants to. Do you Really Believe that Iran And N.Korea are going to Give up their Nukes? Not Me..
 
greg334

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Actually the ones who need to worry about Iran are in Iran and in the middle east.

I think the rhetoric coming from the leader(s) of the country have shifted not because of any new event they have had but because like most of the world, they know we have a different leader who doesn't know a thing about foreign relations and backtracks a lot (lack of real leadership). We have a SoS who is a joke and thinks she can walk into a room and fix things.

I would worry about Israel and how we treat them, it shifts the burden onto them and also makes Iran think that we have weaker relations. THey are the real target, not of the people but of the government.

Remember that there are two parts of the country, the people and the government but if we attack the country (which is more likely with Obama than Bush), we will have the people to deal with which is not a good thing.
 
P

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
greg334 said:
Actually the ones who need to worry about Iran are in Iran and in the middle east.

I think the rhetoric coming from the leader(s) of the country have shifted not because of any new event they have had but because like most of the world, they know we have a different leader who doesn't know a thing about foreign relations and backtracks a lot (lack of real leadership). We have a SoS who is a joke and thinks she can walk into a room and fix things.

I would worry about Israel and how we treat them, it shifts the burden onto them and also makes Iran think that we have weaker relations. THey are the real target, not of the people but of the government.

Remember that there are two parts of the country, the people and the government but if we attack the country (which is more likely with Obama than Bush), we will have the people to deal with which is not a good thing.
Click to expand...

You are Right Greg, The Pant Load in Chief is Totally Incompetent and hasn't been Too Friendly Towards Israel. I Actually Believe some of what the news said that Obumma wants netanayhoo(Just a Guess on the Spelling) to Step down or Asked to step Down. "Source": "WSPD Radio Toledo Approx. 3 Weeks ago,For those who Continually ask for the Source" I also Believe that Israel will Attack Iran in the Near Future, Hopefully I am Wrong as I wouldn't want to see anyone Attacking another Country, But that's the way I See it.
 
greg334

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Well maybe if you know this, but ever since Carter opened his pathetic mouth about the nukes Israel has, Israel has been a bit more defensive with us.

If you want to gain an insight on how out present administration works, get Carter's book about the middle east. It is insightful to how the warped senile minds work when they are in power. It really puts a lot in perspective.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top