France calls for UN to enforce Annan plan under UN's Chapter 7

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
BBC


French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius says he will call on the UN Security Council to make mediator Kofi Annan's Syria peace plan mandatory.

France would propose that Mr Annan's six-point plan be enforced under the UN's Chapter Seven provision, he said.

Mr Fabius said the conflict had become a "civil war", a claim denied by both the Syrian government and opposition.

Meanwhile, Russia has rejected US accusations that it is sending attack helicopters to Damascus

On Tuesday, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that the sale of helicopters would "escalate the conflict quite dramatically".

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov - on a visit to Tehran - insisted that Russia was "not supplying Syria or any other country with items which can be used against peaceful protesters, unlike the United States, which regularly supplies weapons to the region".

Russia and fellow UN Security Council member, China, would be unlikely to accept a Chapter Seven resolution, which allows for action to be backed up by force. But Mr Fabius told a news conference in Paris that he hoped Moscow would agree to the proposal.

It was necessary "to resort to Chapter Seven to make the provisions of the Annan plan mandatory", he said.

"We are working towards this and hope that this move will be swiftly implemented."

'Heavy sanctions'

Back in April, Mr Fabius's predecessor as France's foreign minister, Alain Juppe, warned that if the Annan plan failed then the UN would "have to move to a new stage" involving enforcement.

Under the Annan plan, all armed violence has to end and all parties must ensure provision of humanitarian assistance to all areas affected by the fighting.

The authorities are also required to ensure freedom of movement for journalists and the right for people to demonstrate peacefully

Mr Fabius said the Annan plan would now have to be enforced "under pain of very heavy sanctions".

He said he would get in touch immediately with his European and American colleagues to propose a raft of new, "tougher" measures that would hit not only Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad but also "army officials and all those who support Assad".

Russia and China both have a veto at the UN Security Council and have already blocked two resolutions calling for tougher action against Damascus.

Earlier on Wednesday, Syrian forces seized control of the western mountain town of Haffa after fierce fighting with rebels. State media said Haffa had been "purged of terrorists" and government forces had "restored security and calm to the area".

The rebel Free Syrian Army said it had pulled its fighters out of the area to spare residents from further massive bombardments.

Syrian activists said at least 40 people were killed by security forces across the country on Wednesday. At least 12 people, most of them women and children, died in attacks by helicopters and artillery on the rebel-held town of Rastan, north of Homs, activists reported.

The government said it had buried 27 military personnel killed in the conflict.

As diplomatic moves over Syria intensify, the Russian foreign minister is due to meet British Foreign Secretary William Hague in the Afghan capital, Kabul, on Thursday.

Asked by reporters whether he felt Syria had descended into civil war, Mr Hague said: "I continue to put it the same way as the last few days, that Syria is on the edge of collapse or of a deadly sectarian civil war."

The Syrian government and opposition have both denied that Syria has degenerated into civil war. Damascus says it is clearing out foreign-backed terrorists, while the opposition argues it is trying to defend a continuing mass uprising, the BBC's Jim Muir reports from neighbouring Lebanon.


Annan's six-point peace plan
1. Syrian-led political process to address the aspirations and concerns of the Syrian people

2. UN-supervised cessation of armed violence in all its forms by all parties to protect civilians

3. All parties to ensure provision of humanitarian assistance to all areas affected by the fighting, and implement a daily two-hour humanitarian pause

4. Authorities to intensify the pace and scale of release of arbitrarily detained persons

5. Authorities to ensure freedom of movement throughout the country for journalists

6. Authorities to respect freedom of association and the right to demonstrate peacefully
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Who cares what France thinks? Let them handle it. When they ask for the 'U.N.' to do something they REALLY mean the 'U.S.' and expect us to pay for it.

The U.N. is a joke. So is France for that matter. Syria can handle it's own problems. Same goes for NATO. Get us out of both. It would save us a TON of money, and precious lives.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
the UN has tried this and that and Russia and China have told them to stick it...Russia is sending in attack copters and providing small arms now to the Government in power and admit to it...saying that the US is suppling the rebels...Hilary is making noise, Russia is ignoring her and isn't going to back down at all...Putin is about to school barry just like a little puppy gets its nose swatted by its master...barry is not going to do anything to make any motions against Putin and Russia and Putin knows it.....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Why would Barry ever even THINK, assuming he knows how to think, about going up against his mentors in Moscow? They are one in the same.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Why would Barry ever even THINK, assuming he knows how to think, about going up against his mentors in Moscow? They are one in the same.

He won't, but its an election yr, he has to point out that he is a strong leader while all the time kowtowing to Putin, just has he did with the "Defense Shield" for europe...
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
He won't, but its an election yr, he has to point out that he is a strong leader while all the time kowtowing to Putin, just has he did with the "Defense Shield" for europe...

Obama saying he is 'strong on defense' is like saying that dogs are really cows.

As to the U.N. handling this, they never finished the Korean war. What in the world makes anyone think that they can fix this?
 
Last edited:

Monty

Expert Expediter
Wasn't the actions in Iraq, by Bush, an enforcement of some UN regulations?

(No, it wasn't because his Daddy was threatened.)

The UN needs to move to Switzerland, or someplace, and the US needs to stop supporting them.

Donald Trump could do a lot with that vacant lot on the river!
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The U.N. needs to just go away. They serve no real purpose and it is even more corrupt than our government is.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
The US is pays all their bills, owns the land and the building and the biggest contributor to anything they need money for..its way past time to evict them and drop our membership....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Another good reason to get out of the U.N. is to keep Obama from giving control of our country to them. In other words, if Obama likes it there is a better than even chance that it sucks, no matter what it is!
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
The US is pays all their bills, owns the land and the building and the biggest contributor to anything they need money for..its way past time to evict them and drop our membership....


Not saying I disagree with you Dennis (or agree for that matter LOL :p) but what if ........

The US does drop their UN membership ........ would more "incidents" "unrest" occur in the world?

And !! ..........

Before anyone says "so what, nothing to do with us" LOL :p

What if ....... the US needs help at sometime say ....... Asia

Just a thought :rolleyes:
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Not saying I disagree with you Dennis (or agree for that matter LOL :p) but what if ........

The US does drop their UN membership ........ would more "incidents" "unrest" occur in the world?

And !! ..........

Before anyone says "so what, nothing to do with us" LOL :p

What if ....... the US needs help at sometime say ....... Asia

Just a thought :rolleyes:

And given the current political climate in the world, just who would step up to "help" the US if what you are referencing was to occur?? Personally I am more then willing to let the cards fall where they may and deal with whatever would come to our shores....and beyond that, i certainly wouldn't want a bunch of "blue helmets here on our shores....and i also don't see the UN helping the US in anyway anyhow.....for the UN, the US is kinda like "a useful idiot" ...to be abused and used as needed....
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
And given the current political climate in the world, just who would step up to "help" the US if what you are referencing was to occur?? Personally I am more then willing to let the cards fall where they may and deal with whatever would come to our shores....and beyond that, i certainly wouldn't want a bunch of "blue helmets here on our shores....and i also don't see the UN helping the US in anyway anyhow.....for the UN, the US is kinda like "a useful idiot" ...to be abused and used as needed....



Hey!!

I thought that was our role :confused:


As for who would help the US if they dropped from UN? - I think the UK would :)
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
English Lady wrote:


Hey!!

I thought that was our role :confused:

And for too long we have "played" it well...

As for who would help the US if they dropped from UN? - I think the UK would :)

As i said in "the current political climate" i don't think even the UK would help or if they are even capable at this point considering their "economic" situation.....
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
English Lady wrote:




And for too long we have "played" it well...


No, I meant I thought that title belonged to the UK :p

As i said in "the current political climate" i don't think even the UK would help or if they are even capable at this point considering their "economic" situation.....

Oh I do believe if the US asked we would be there .... Tallyho ! :)
 

Attachments

  • 300px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom_svg.png
    300px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom_svg.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 1

aristotle

Veteran Expediter
If the United States found itself in critical danger, Americans could depend on unwavering support from the UK, Canada and Australia. Some of the former Soviet bloc nations, as well as Japan, would probably surprise many with their support for the US. Despite what the liberal media reports, the United States is not without strong friends.
 
Top