My point is:
If your mother is thumbing the yellow pages under A for abortion...your outlook of a good loving childhood are pretty bad..so why should that child be brought into a life where it will be possibly rejected..not loved..fed..housed..and thrown on society..
Who says its murder anyway...sure wait till the end of the pregnancy ..but im talking at the very beginning of the pregnancy.....guess we will never see eye to eye..
Your argument is nothing but supposition of possibilities.. things that yes, might be possible but in no way are certain. Death is an absolute, a finality, irrevocable. Is there another legitimate name for the taking of innocent life besides murder? I'm not talking about the liberals bull**** renaming of things to make them pretty and acceptable like calling discrimination affirmative action. I'm talking legitimate that intelligent people who actually think with their brains would use.
Your "very beginning" argument is another liberal bull**** argument. That baby is the same person from the moment of conception to the moment of birth and through the generations until death by natural causes. They generally add something to it about viability when they want to extend the killing timetable, arguing since the baby isn't viable unattached to the umbilical it's not truly alive and ok to kill. Hmmm.. great argument and in that case every astronaut and every scuba diver isn't alive since they aren't viable unattached from their umbilicals.
I'm not discussing rape or incest. Those are totally separate and frankly horrible things. I am pointing out that no matter how many bull**** arguments are given it is still bull**** and it is still murder of the innocent for the convenience of the guilty.