Search results

Someone has to pay for the free stuff the 47 percent get. You are gonna have to start selling those boats and guns. Anything less than that mean "you aren't doing your fair share".:D

They say "they lost 61 million". I think they know where it really is but don't want to say. They have overspent everywhere and will have to continue to do so for the plan to continue. Just heard today that if they can't get their web site up and running, they will have to expand call centers...

More of a socialist plan but we are halfway there here in the US> We don't per se have income limitations, but we do have "unconditional income". We just happen to call it government assistance or welfare.

You are currently seeing only the bargain rates at this point. What people are currently seeing is considerably higher than previously thought. People are just now starting to see that reality. What did Obama say last week? "We need to get immigration back on track". They still have the goal...

Turtle wrote Hey now, I only represent part of that. :cool:

Just an observation. The husband wants to know if he is working harder than the wife. :cool: Can't win an argument without the numbers. :D

One thing for sure................"watch what they do, not what they say". The whole plan is a disaster, but it is bad enough that it really does look like another agenda at work. Doesn't look like they exempted themselves from it by accident. :rolleyes:

The big kicker for most even with low premiums and subsidies is many are hit with a huge deductible. I seen on TV one couple was 10k and another was 14K. That has to be paid BEFORE you recieve any insurance benefits. On a side note, just like the failed web site and other goofy stuff, this is...

Almost too much information Turtle. You are going to turn Cheri in to a Tea Party member. :cool:

It is basically a NSA drone program for the trucking industry. :cool:

Was he smoking?;)

Looking at it from another angle, it could give pause for some optimism. :cool:

As I have said before, if more regulation is coming, and we know it is, it is my position to have it to the industry's benefit. They may amend legislation, but they "don't get rid of it". And again, no one is calling for more regulation, but more is coming. They have already said as much...

Just to comment on a couple of things, I think safety is probably the way to. Other items would likely feed off of that. The notion that once every one gets a CDL is good to go is not accurate. Someone going through a three month college program is much more prepared than someone who was...

It is the easiest way to do it if a carrier is going to have a acceptance policy.

Kinda like a stale sammich.:cool:

Shouldn't hurt it.

In that sense maybe, and he was identified as a republican but differed on quite a few other things. Most of that was brought out in the last presidential debates. You find someone with his ideas and plays well to the camera, and I'll show you a winner.

On that kind of plan they likely are, or.....you are silently penalized for turning something down.

No. There are many places he doesn't identify with the hard right. Global intervention is certainly one of the big ones.