Wake up America

Oilerman1957

Expert Expediter
Oilerman,
I am sorry but you fell for the propaganda and really don't know what happened.

1- GM would have gone into a legal bankruptcy which would have protected them while they reorganized the company, shed some of their debt but unless there was a compelling reason for it would not have effectively slammed the stockholders of the company by making their stock worthless.

a) the reality of this bankruptcy is the Obama administration pushed the judge to make concessions by approving an accelerated plan to split the company, make the government(s), the UAW and other "investors" owners while selling off assets that were viable (Opel, etc..)

b) this other half of the coin is the adminstration had no business being involved irreagrdless what loans that were made to the company, most of this circumvented a lot of the laws to allow it to happen before anyone knew what happened. Illegal? sort of but defintely unethical.

2 - wagner was retired, and it was done by the white house. The problem is that the second that was done, the government step over the consitutuional line. They are not allowed to mess with contractual obligations like this and it may be a good thing but it really doesn't matter because due to the bankruptcy judge, they should have fired hendersen and the upper managment as part of a reorg but they didn't and still haven't reorg'ed the company at all - in other words it is the same GM as it was before.

3 - there is an appointed government offical that oversees the day by day operaitons of the company and apporves upper managment's decisions. This is a hidden fact and the person has zero automotive knowledge.

5 - Yesterday's Detroit News states that our $50 billion dollar investment into GM is now worth $25 billion.

5 - Chrysler was put into the situation by cerberus so they can rid themselves of the company. They are or have sued Mercedes over some idea that Mercedes told them they will make billions on the investment. Chrysler could have simply gone away and the assets sold off to us investors for pennies on the dollar.

6 - the losers out of all of this are the american tax payer and the country. They will have to foot the bill for the "loans" that we will end up not only paying for directly but also by paying the perpetual interest on the loans that we had to secure to get the money in the first place. All said and done, the $50 billion debt that we have with GM will be a debt of $126 billion in 2050 - an impossible number for them to pay back if they were to. By the way, the 'experts who wanted to see GM go into bankruptcy the right way have said that they will not produce the vehicles at the numbers they think simply because of the exposure to the market, they have lost market share during theprocess that they will never regain and that will lessen their overall revenue.

7 - the cash for clunkers goes way beyond the $4000, it is right we the tax payers are on the hook for more than $20k for each and every car sold under this program.

8 - the banks are failing, the work being done by the administration is not the right stuff that is needed to save the banks or the economy, we need to enforce the laws and hold people accoutable to bring back trust.

9 - a lot of the problems we now have are directly related to the UAW, their ownership in any company is not warrented and the stock holders of these companies should have had a choice to receive compensation for their secured investments. I am hard pressed to buy another UAW made vehicle, and it will only be a Ford product if that.

LOL Greg, no i didnt fall for propaganda as im sure u didnt in your vote, I made a decision between 2 people who ran. You dont know me either to say i dont know what happened, really you dont have to attack people for there beliefs.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Most people totally understand what would have happened, and most wouldn't have been affected to the degree that the government wants us to believe it would have...but it still should have be let to happen no matter what the affect....such is life...if people have set themselves up to surivive bank losses and savings or stock losses, they have no one to blame but themselves...blind faith in anyone , banker, broker, investment advisor, or goverment when it comes to your money is just stupid....Banks failed in the 80's we made it thru, the only thing that these Tarp funds saved was the azz'z of the bankster...not the American paople......
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Me thinks "Oilerman" is a retired GM machine Oiler and no matter what, he is a UNION man 1st and foremost...just my opinion....:D
 

Oilerman1957

Expert Expediter
You bet it is a strong opinion, as i have strong feelings when it comes to my freedom and liberties...and this person in the WH has stepped all over them....

How do i know what he believes!?!? He has stated it in interviews when he was a Constitutional law professor in Chicago (you did know he taught constitutional law didn't you?) He has made it clear what he believes in in his statements and actions while on the campiagn trail and since being in office...dang....

And NO most americans do NOT believe in "sharing the wealth"...most Americans believe in HELPING others in need when THEY make the deciision to do so, not the Government taking their tax dollars (illegally) and using it for the enbetterment of someone else......

Walter Williams, has a pretty famous saying that goes like this..."When a person reaches in his own pocket and gives money (his own income) to someone in need, thats charity, when the government puts its hand in ones pocket and takes money (taxes) and gives it to someone they feel is in need, thats theft...

And you do that there is no where in the Constitution that makes it legal or Constitutional for the government to use Tax Dollars to the betterment of a person...any person or persons....its no where to be found.....

Sure most americans believe in sharing the wealth, do we not ask for raises if our company make money? yes we do. We may actually believe in alot of the same things but write it in a different way. When i say about sharing the wealth i am talking about corporate versus working person. Politicans will always step on our freedoms as we have given them the power to do so, rep or dem.
 

Oilerman1957

Expert Expediter
Me thinks "Oilerman" is a retired GM machine Oiler and no matter what, he is a UNION man 1st and foremost...just my opinion....:D

AHAHAHAHA I am, but, i do try to do what i can for any working person. Tired of watching them get walked on and things being taken away from them as corporate execs walk with bonuses
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
LOL Greg, no i didnt fall for propaganda as im sure u didnt in your vote, I made a decision between 2 people who ran. You dont know me either to say i dont know what happened, really you dont have to attack people for there beliefs.

I didn't really attack you, I could if you want but that's not what I want to do or what I am saying. True I don't have to know you, but you seem to be taking the position like many many people have who fell for the same old pro-union line that this stuff was done to correct real problems and it is the right thing to do for the country. All propaganda and most of it is a fallacy to promote and protect an antiquated method of protecting labor.

Health care is another one of those issues that has a party line and a lot of propaganda spinning around. The Unions and other ignorant people don't want to hear the truth and I see a lot of seniors finally waking up to reality, especially UAW workers who will end up with only the "government option". Seeing they have b*tched about their co-pays going up and limits on their care, they will really be angry with the strict limited coverage they will get with any government changes to our health care. It is a sacrifice that they will have to make to further the cause, be it organized labor's or the democratic agenda.

Honestly I don't care who you voted for, although I am very glad you voted but nevertheless I had a choice; a socialist who has done nothing in his life and stands for less or an old man who wanted to ruin my country by his feeble and stupid positions he has taken in the past but could have been contained - I voted for containment. I think the country would have been worst off if McCain did get elected, and right now I am hoping that people will wake up and realize that we need balance in the congress, not a loop sided governing body.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
lol, no we ask for raises based on our LABOR , we get paid for the SERVICE we provide...it is an EXCHANGE ...no one aske for a "handout as in "share the wealth", take from those that have and give to those that don't have...except the liberal entitlement mentality...and that is exactly what barry wants for this country....

As for Corp vs working person, again, we work on and exchange basis, pay for a service provided...unless a company sets up a "profit sharing program"... no employee or "working person" is "entitled" to anything more then what they have agreed to as payment for the service they provide...

As for the corp "stepping on the worker....get over it...the Corps employ the people, not the other way around....no where is it written or even impied that anyone owes anyone anything..you and everyone else in ths country as the right to PURSUE whatever it is they feel they want or need, as long as it is legal.....

Oh and my dad was a union stewart, business agent and held elected office in a Teamster local, so i know both sides of labor management......

And you were easy to pickout as a "union" person........there was never any doubt.....
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
AHAHAHAHA I am, but, i do try to do what i can for any working person. Tired of watching them get walked on and things being taken away from them as corporate execs walk with bonuses

Well Chef, I understand what he is trying to do, I think it is great because many don't care and will not say it.

But Oilerman, how does the company walk all over an UAW worker?

I haven't seen that happen and the stories of pre-union days at Ford are long gone and mostly forgotten.

Nothing is taken away from Labor unless the Union wants it taken away. No one forced the union to conceed what they have gotten for their workers but on the other hand the collective sprit of things is out of date and too slow to respond to the needs of the company and the individual would be in a better position to think as the white collar guys do, as individuals.

You shouldn't care what the execs make, they earned it by doing their job. See they negotiated that bonus, they sat down individually. had a talent the company needed and worked to come up with some agreement for their compensation. It was that talent that was created by the need of bettering themselves through a higher education and/or work experience that they brought to the company.

In turn they do their job to have the company prosper, maybe they were financial experts who made sure labor had a job next year by figuring out how to hedge a downturn in the economy or maybe they are execs who figure out how to make it easier for labor to work, lessen injuries and enjoy a better life. You can't begrudge these guys, they earned their money as you did, they worked as hard as you do and they want to have the same outcome as you do, to see the company prosper.

I think what really matters to me and why causes me to have such a bad attitude about the UAW is that most workers take pride in their union above the pride in the company where they should be proud of their company first and only.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Ohhh Greg!!! Come on, the Companies are evil, they only want to hold the worker down and steal from them. the union is the only safe haven for the worker, the union members are entitled to the jobs the the Company creates, its their right to those jobs, its not for the company to decide whats a fair wage based on profitablity if the company...the worker is entitled to whatever the union wants them to have no matter if the company makes money of not....i mean without the unions the workers would be nothing more then garbage to the corps.....:rolleyes:

Did I say it good dad!?!? :D
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
in todays day and age.....it ceratinly is not a as good a thing as it once was......but then again, i guess it depends on your views, and you have shown yours.....
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Holy crap...I leave and a real conversation breaks out...*LOL*

Opposing views and no name calling....Kool:D
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Oh YEAH!!??!! I thought you liked name calling!! OH OH and don't forget finger pointing!!! LOL!!!!:D
 
Top