Dont count on it. His supporters will call it a fake court and continue to make excuses and keep wearing blinders to the obvious........perhaps then an explanation can be given for Trump's treasonous actions.
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
Influenced, maybe. The reason I'm not comfortable with "infiltrated" is, infiltrate, verb, enter or gain access to (an organization, place, etc.) surreptitiously and gradually, especially in order to acquire secret information.Fair enough ....
We're going to have to wait for the court cases to provide the details. When it does get proved that Trump was influenced and made decisions based on advise from these guys, perhaps then an explanation can be given for Trump's treasonous actions.
The reason doesn't matter. Whether anyone agrees with it or not doesn't matter. The President can conduct foreign policy any way he (or she) sees fit, including recalling, reassigning or firing an ambassador.
Occam's Razor says the simplest explanation is usually the right one. In this case, the new Ukrainian president didn't like Yovanovich at all, mainly because she liked the previous corrupt Ukrainian president better and didn't like the new one at all.
Wrong
I wonder why Dems care so much about this Ukraine impeachment hoax?
I guess we can agree to disagree. I think infiltrated fits but if you don't like that word .. how about penetrated! Yep, I think that works. Trump was penetrated, our country was penetrated, our entire democracy was penetrated! Trump got got! He and his good 'ol freind Rudy thought they would simply conduct foreign diplomacy on their own. They'd show everyone how easy this stuff is. As President, Trump thinks he can do whatever he wants and if Rudy gets into any real trouble, Trump can pardon him later. In reality, they look like two keystone cops.
Yes, I think we're all aware the President can conduct foreign policy any which way he wants. Are you really saying the POTUS's reasons for making decisions don't matter? Really? Let's look at this a different way because I think Muttly is getting overwhelmed. Let's say the country was Argentina or ... Columbia. Two Colombian businessmen, that are associates with a very close friend of the POTUS, illegally donate a few hundred thousand dollars to a superPac that supports the POTUS. These two businessmen tell the POTUS, through their mutual friend, that the Ambassador to Columbia is a royal pain in the ass. She stands in the way of doing business and seeing as how she's a chick anyway, she's gotta be replaced. The POTUS replaces the Ambassador to Columbia based on nothing but the recommendation from these two crooked businessmen. That doesn't startle you? This is where folks on here start to loose credibility with me ..... it should startle all of us.
"In this case, the new Ukrainian president didn't like Yovanovich at all, mainly because she liked the previous corrupt Ukrainian president better and didn't like the new one at all."
Can you please explain how you're drawing this conclusion?
Last edited:
You nailed it. Oh, no wait ... perhaps it's got something to do with Hilary too.
Binary choices are doing some serious damage to this country.
Could care less. Bored to tears hearing anything about Ukraine and especially about Purvas and Freeman. And most people don't care as well.
That isn't a conclusion that I drew, I watched the hearings and heard three different career foreign service professionals say that very thing. Plus Yovanovitch herself said she had a much better working relationship with the previous Ukrainian president she did with the current president.
"WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Friday to hear President Donald Trump's appeal of lower court orders, now on hold, that require his banks and accountants to turn over financial records to the House and local prosecutors in New York.
'By granting review of these cases now, the justices made it possible for them to be heard during the current court term, most likely in March, with a decision by the end of June ..." (Source)
Most people believed these three financial records cases would end up in the Supreme Court. Now we know the Court will consider all three at once and will issue it's decision(s) by June.
So let me ask this, do you think Biden did something wrong or do you not care? If you think he didn't do anything wrong that's one thing. But if you don't care well then that signals the beginning of the end. We already have a good portion of the population that thinks that the law does not apply to them. And now if people don't care if the vice- president broke the law why should anyone follow the law?
If he had any business dealings in Ukraine, then he did things that would be considered corrupt, that is the way that entire country works. I will say that when it comes to a trial in the Senate, and they do call Hunter to the stand and put him under oath and he says he was not involved with any corruption and it comes out later that he did, the impeachment trial will kill 2 birds with one stone.
Either way the Democrats win, the easiest thing would be for the republicans to turn against him and impeach him. The other thing would be for the trial to convince enough of his supporters to not vote for his re election, and as we all know, it wouldnt really take that many people to flip and he does not get another 4 years.
Why would anybody else care?
There's only 2 sides to this story.
Yes, one side making America great again.
And the other still having a hissy fit about losing an election.
When you have a focus group in order to decide what wording to use in impeachment charges, you know there's no factual basis for the impeachment. When you have 84 House Dems come out on record in favor of Impeachment months before the whistleblower stunt was even conceived, you know there's no factual for the impeachment. When Democrats demand Mitch McConnell recuse himself as being biased, and demand Chuck Schumer be in charge of the Senate impeachment proceedings, because Schumer can be, like, totally, unbiased and impartial, you know the Dems aren't even living in reality any more.
Analysis | Fact Checker: Trump has made 15,413 false or misleading claims over 1,055 days — The Washington Post
The impeachment probe over the president's Ukraine doings has led to an explosion of false and misleading claims.
Well here is something he can be proud of.....
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums