"Entitlement" is a dirty word

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Say it ain't so...

April 29, 2011

Obama's Brand of 'Greatness' for America

By Kevin Jackson
American Thinker: Obama's Brand of 'Greatness' for America

Obama's budget reminds me of the joke where the wife asks her husband, "Should I get a bikini or an all-in-one?" The husband replies, "Better get a bikini...you'll never get it all in one."

The budget is out of control because of the thing that Obama says makes America great: entitlements. Who knew that giving money to the shiftless and lazy is the way we are supposed to measure ourselves?

Apparently America is at the pinnacle of its greatness, because we are giving it all away. According to this report American Thinker: Obama's Brand of 'Greatness' for America , 50% of Americans are receiving entitlements, and more shocking is this report Welfare Use by Immigrant Households with Children | Center for Immigration Studies that shows that as many as 62% of illegal immigrants are receiving them. I can understand 10% of Americans receiving entitlements, because conservatives are sensitive to the plight of the underprivileged, despite the lies from the lunatic left. But 50% just helps me understand how many lazy leftoids there are -- you know, people who believe that they are entitled to our money.

Like the 40% who don't represent the relatively small group of Americans who actually need help, illegal aliens are entitled to nothing except to be thrown out of the bar. We've all seen the movies where the bouncers escort the troublemaker out of the trendy bar full of gorgeous hotties and then toss him onto the sidewalk. Well, America is the trendy bar full of gorgeous hotties called conservatives. We value our club, and we won't let just anybody in. You have to dress right and "know somebody," or you are entitled to meet the pavement.

A New York Times columnist disagrees http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/18/opinion/18mon1.html with me, saying Republicans are trying to make "entitlement" a dirty word. It really sucks that we are still only "trying." "Entitlement" is a dirty word. Life entitles you to nothing except to die, and even that doesn't have to be pretty.


These days, the left wants to give out free residences, food, cars, cell phones, TVs, video games, and about everything else. It's quite frankly ridiculous. It would be different if the government provided basics, leaving incentive to work for an Xbox. But the government will give you the Xbox, too, and free games -- confiscated from the kids of hardworking conservatives, of course.

When did it become a source of pride to receive entitlements? Further, those who are best at getting them are respected in their communities, even looked upon as policy gurus. They teach clinics while at their stylists, and again when getting their manicures and pedicures. They even enlighten while shopping for DVDs and wardrobes.

In the old days, people hid the fact that they needed government assistance, and they worked hard to get off the system. Not anymore, Rip Van Winkle. To remove the stigma of being a freeloader, the government has gone to the welfare credit card. And in California you can now buy liquor and cigarettes on your welfare credit card, not to mention the gambling and Hawaiian vacations people were taking with them last year. One would guess that the Golden State is saying, "Screw it; things are so bad here, we might as well let you smoke and/or drink yourselves to death!" You never know with the left. These entitlements have gotten us the worst credit rating in the modern era. However, they did one good thing, and that is to expose just how inept at economics Obama is.

The national debt adds $1M every twenty seconds. Imagine the national lottery we could have if we had no debt! We could create a millionaire every twenty seconds, or roughly 4,300 millionaires every day. How's that for stimulus?

Despite our little debt problem, Obama wants to keep printing money, keep spending money, and raise the debt ceiling. Why bother calling it a ceiling, since the debt ceiling has already been raised three times in The Time of O? Let's just call it a moving target.

So what if we hit the debt ceiling? It's not like the lights will go off in America. Will Lockheed stop building that next missile system, or will they just say, "Well, looks like our number-one client is gonna be late for a bit?" Given Standard and Poor's put our rating on warning, I suspect our creditors already know what's happening.

Yet government credit cards are not being cut. Nobody's threatening to repossess Air Force One, and Obama is not hiding the presidential limos at a storage locker in D.C. or having Secret Service run interference from creditors. No, Obama is still living large, likely planning his next taxpayer-funded vacation.

The only thing we have done that is more stupid than allowing the Geri-curl and plus-sized spandex is the election of Obama. The New Black Panthers know it, Louis Farrakhan knows it, and Oprah knows it. Deal with it, liberal America, because you know it, too.

In the midst of a financial meltdown that cost the American taxpayers $1.4T, Obama and Geithner said to the Wall Street Journal that they are optimistic about the budget deficit Obama, Geithner Optimistic About Deficit - WSJ.com . Seriously, how can you be optimistic about the budget deficit? That's like being optimistic about being three months behind on your mortgage. Surpluses make you happy, not deficits.

Obama's solution is to attack the most productive people in America: the conservative rich. The liberal rich are the morons, but conservative rich people work for a living and create jobs. They also create opportunity, the thing that people used to come to America to find -- and not at the welfare office.

There is certainly enough history on the subject of tax increases that you would think Obama wouldn't even consider -- correction: re-consider -- such an inane notion. But as Obama said in 2008 Video: Obama’s redistributionism on capital gains taxes « Hot Air about raising the Capital Gains Tax, he would do it "for fairness purposes." Fair to whom?

When Maryland passed a higher tax rate http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124329282377252471.html on people earning $1 million a year or more, the number of millionaires living in Maryland fell from nearly 8,000 to fewer than 6,000. Maryland counted on $106 million in increase revenue, but instead, revenues fell by $257 million. Oops.

Enough is enough, America. "Entitlement" is a dirty word. If you haven't contributed to the system, you are entitled to nothing.
 
Last edited:

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
"Entitlement" is NOT a dirty word. Everyone is entitled to what they EARN. NO ONE is ENTITLED to others wages or charity. That goes for freely given charity or government FORCED charity. The idea that someone is "entitled" to the fruits of someone else's labor is absurd.
 

Brisco

Expert Expediter
Heard the new definition of Obawanomics this morning flipping through channels.

Obawanomics: Where one that works harder than everyone else to pay more to the Government so that others who do very little can get more from the Government.
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
Entitlements are going to be an awfull hard habit to break. I wonder if recipients realize that the old saying, that you don't get something for nothing is still true.

jimmy
 
Last edited:

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
We need more people with the idea that welfare, similar programs, are SHORT term, and should be PAID BACK!! Like James Braddock.
The idea of taking aid from the government should be repugnant to most people and looked upon ONLY as a LAST resort.

There are, for the most part, two types of people in this country.
There are "Makers" and there are "Takers". We need FAR more of the first and far fewer of the second.

We need a government that is NOT in the way of the Makers and does NOT strip them of what they earn.
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
I would like to add that state and local governments should not be taking handouts from Washington, in the form of grant money . Gives federal bureaucrats entirely to much say, over state, local governments policies

jimmy.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
People who accept "aid" are NOT free. They are dependent or "subjects" of the benefactor. In other words, owned. Same with States. Government "grants" come with "strings" attached. When the government wants certain behavior, they just "pull the strings"
 

Freightdawg

Expert Expediter
I was listening to the Al Sharpton show a few weeks ago on XM. He had a guest host who was talking about that group in Texas who were raising money for white male only scholarships. He wasn't upset about that, but was upset with white women getting minority scholarships that he said should go to black women. He was saying that the Texas groups were a bunch of Republicans. And that Republicans better not mess with his entitlements. I wish I could have asked him just what he was entitled too. :confused:
 

garyatk

Seasoned Expediter
That is what happens when these two corrupt parties have created a system where the lobbyist buys what they want, and the representatives in return go buy the votes that are needed to get it done.

If voters were required to be property owners, most entitlement seekers wouldn't have the right to vote.

But that is why the Democrats and Republicans created Social inSecurity and Medi-who-Cares. We will ALL be living off entitlements one day....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
That is what happens when these two corrupt parties have created a system where the lobbyist buys what they want, and the representatives in return go buy the votes that are needed to get it done.

If voters were required to be property owners, most entitlement seekers wouldn't have the right to vote.

But that is why the Democrats and Republicans created Social inSecurity and Medi-who-Cares. We will ALL be living off entitlements one day....


Going to HAVE to live off of entitlements, they are soon going to be taxing us at a 100% rate. That is their plan. Total control.
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
[QUOTE"If voters were required to be property owners, most entitlement seekers wouldn't have the right to vote."
Voters were required to be property owners at one point in US. history. I would have to disagree about property ownership being a valid qualification for voting rights.

jimmy
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
I wouldn't go as far to say that voters have to be property owners. But you could say that those on the government dole have a choice... either get off the dole, or don't vote.
 

garyatk

Seasoned Expediter
I wouldn't go as far to say that voters have to be property owners. But you could say that those on the government dole have a choice... either get off the dole, or don't vote.


There goes the AARP vote, and no more free scooters for everyone! :)
 

bobwg

Expert Expediter
There goes the AARP vote, and no more free scooters for everyone! :)

I am an AARP member but thinking of dumping it I hear there is another group like AARP that supports conservative ideas have to find out more about them dont even know what they call it yet
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Leo beat me to it, but here is the link:

AMAC, Inc. - The Association of Mature American Citizens

And About them:

About AMAC

For many years, there was only one senior organization.

Today, The Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC) is here to protect your interests, and to offer an alternative perspective on how to best solve the problems seniors face today.

AMAC will be on your side when it comes to fighting high taxes, which are especially harmful to those living on a fixed income. You can count on AMAC to speak out to preserve the values that helped make America a great nation. AMAC is not afraid to say we still believe in God and Country.

We are the new senior organization. And we need your help to grow.

AMAC was developed for anyone age 50 or above, and to provide discounts not available anywhere else.

Discounts for AMAC members include hotel and motel discounts at over 7,000 locations across the country, discounts to help you save on auto and homeowners insurance, and we’re working very hard to provide exclusive discounts in your local area.

Stores, restaurants, and business in your town and neighborhood are joining the AMAC merchant network to provide you with substantial discounts of 10% or more on products and services. New merchants are joining every day (see our Frequently Asked Questions for more information on our local discounts efforts). Our local discount offerings have been a home run on Long Island and Westchester, New York, as well as central Florida. It is our goal to expand our local discounts program to every town in America. Help us spread the word by asking your favorite local merchants to contact us about being included in the program!

In an effort to expand our local discount program nationally - and as quickly as possible - we’ll soon be launching our “AMAC Ambassador Program”. We’ll be looking for your help to make it a success.

To learn more about AMAC and what we are doing, be sure to check out the AMAC Action category under Helpful Resources, and read a brief biography of our founder.

We at AMAC feel it is time for the people to speak out for the traditional American values of faith, family, and freedom. We promise to be your advocate to fight the good fight. Please explore our website to learn how you can benefit by becoming a member. Stand together with us.
 
Top