barry Gives A Bigger Free Ride for Those on Welfare...

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Yeap, get them on the Government "Tit" and no longer requirer them to seek work....LOL...just one more socialist ideal you obama supporters got for your vote...Hope that "Hope & Change" is working for you...:rolleyes:

Oh, and barry just changed the law with a “official policy directive” ..I guess we no longer recognize the "seperation of powers".....


‘Partisan Disgrace’: Obama Admin Quietly Rewrites Welfare Reform Law


  • Posted on July 13, 2012 at 3:36pm
  • by
    279425.thumbnail.jpg
    Becket Adams
  • ‘Partisan Disgrace’: Obama Admin Quietly Rewrites Welfare Reform Law | TheBlaze.com
In move that went largely “unnoticed” by the mainstream media, the Obama administration on Thursday released an “official policy directive” that essentially rewrites the landmark welfare reform law of 1996, the Washington Examiner’s Byron York reports.

“The directive,” York explains, “allows the Department of Health and Human Services to waive the work requirement at the heart of welfare reform.”
An “Information Memorandum” released by the Department of Health and Human Services’ states:
[The] HHS has authority to waive compliance with this 402 requirement and authorize a state to test approaches and methods other than those set forth in section 407, including definitions of work activities and engagement, specified limitations, verification procedures, and the calculation of participation rates.
The memo, as the Daily Caller’s Caroline May notes, argues that by waiving the so-called “work requirements,” the feds are encouraging “states to consider new, more effective ways to meet the goals of TANF, particularly helping parents successfully prepare for, find, and retain employment.”

Of course, the decision is seen by many on the right as a weakening, maybe even a violation, of the 1996 reform law.

The law, “originally vetoed but later signed into law by President Bill Clinton, is widely viewed as the most successful policy initiative in a generation. Under it, the growth in welfare rolls was reversed and millions of people moved from welfare to work,” York writes.

“Despite its success, however, many liberals remain opposed to reform. For example, in the years immediately after passage of the law, Barack Obama himself pledged to do all he could to undo it,” he adds.

Well, it looks like he’s done it. The Obama administration’s decision is “the end of welfare reform as we know it,” said Robert Rector, a welfare policy expert at the Heritage Foundation.
“President Obama just tore up a basic foundation of the welfare contract,” said Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Jordan.

“Today’s action is also a blatant violation of the law. After immigration, education, marriage, and religious conscience protections, we can now add welfare reform to the list of laws President Obama refuses to follow,” he adds.

House Speaker John Boehner released a statement criticizing the president.
“By gutting the work requirements in President Clinton’s signature welfare reform law, President Obama is admitting his economic policies have failed,” Boehner wrote.

He continues:
While President Clinton worked with Congress in a bipartisan way on welfare reform and economic opportunity, President Obama has routinely ignored Republican proposals, rejected House-passed jobs bills, and imposed an agenda that’s helped keep the unemployment rate above eight percent for 41 months.
Welfare reform was an historic, bipartisan success — this move by the Obama administration is a partisan disgrace.
Meanwhile, as the president’s campaign continues to chase after thoroughly debunked Bain Capital narratives, Mitt Romney has already come out and hit the White House for its welfare rewrite.

“President Obama now wants to strip the established work requirements from welfare,” Romney said.

“The success of bipartisan welfare reform, passed under President Clinton, has rested on the obligation of work. The president’s action is completely misdirected. Work is a dignified endeavor, and the linkage of work and welfare is essential to prevent welfare from becoming a way of life,” he added.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
MORE redistribution of wealth. MORE bypassing of the congress. Closer to a dictatorship on a daily basis.

Just wait, when the Senate does not ratify the UN small arms treaty, you know, the one that gives the UN power directly over US citizens, he will bypass again and enforce it. What sovereign nation? What Constitution? It may already be over.

Time for more ammo orders.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Most were warned. This is what happens when you vote in a idiot. Again, once you have more takers than givers, you will quickly be Europe.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Those of us who tried to warn others were labeled as nuts or radicals. Well, can anyone please tell me how they can still not see how evil this guy is?
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
He is doing all he can to buy as many votes as possible. He preys on the weak minded, knowing that they are bought for cheap, and in the end, easily controlled.

Once he is reelected in November he will be free to complete the take over of the country. We will cease to exist as a free and sovereign nation.

Then things will hit the fan.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
As much as I dislike a Beretta 92 it may be time to have one.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
You may be right. Romney certainly isn't all that but I will say I doubt you would be getting this kind of stuff if he was elected. Just not seeing it.
Or at least, I hope not.
 
Last edited:

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
You may be right. Romney certainly isn't all that but I will say I doubt you would be getting this kind of stuff if he was elected. Just not seeing it.


Romney is making no effort to win. He wins either way. He is just the other side of the same power coin. He has no interest in the good of the nation either.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Romney is making no effort to win. He wins either way. He is just the other side of the same power coin. He has no interest in the good of the nation either.

Maybe, but he is looking like the less of two evils. Don't see anyone else with any chance of winning other than him at the moment. Have to go with the odds and hope for the best.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Maybe, but he is looking like the less of two evils. Don't see anyone else with any chance of winning other than him at the moment. Have to go with the odds and hope for the best.

There is no one else out there who would run. I will likely write in my choice, I am tired of settling. He is the lesser of two evils, but not by much. It likely does not matter, the "fix" is already in for King Barry.
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
I was gonna fuss about an Imperial Presidency , and Congress just being lapdogs. Then I looked up the term Imperial Presidency.

jimmy
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
Will congress ever get over their attention deficit syndrome ? Possibly realize there are more important concerns than there their respective reelection campaigns ?

jimmy
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Will congress ever get over their attention deficit syndrome ? Possibly realize there are more important concerns than there their respective reelection campaigns ?

jimmy

Nope. That is beyond their capabilities. They don't care who is running the country nor how oppressive it gets as long as their pockets are full.
 

Brisco

Expert Expediter
Those of us who tried to warn others were labeled as nuts or radicals. Well, can anyone please tell me how they can still not see how evil this guy is?

You forget to mention that we are labeled as Racist Bigots in some way or another too................
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
It's settling alright but writing in or abstaining is voting FOR Obama by default.
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
After reading the linked Memo, I have to say that the OP's interpretation [and subsequent comments] are totally off the wall.
The goal is to allow states [which actually distribute welfare funds] to do whatever works to reduce dependency on welfare and children outside of marriage. As nearly every state is in the same fiscal boat as the Feds [sinking], it boggles the mind that people think that state officials are generous with 'money for nothing'. The fact is they'd like nothing better than to to reduce the welfare rolls to the bare minimum, but they know something many others refuse to understand: 99% of welfare recipients have no other options. If they did, the State would require them to pursue them. The state of Ohio is, right now, requiring a friend of my mother's to attend classes in order to learn a new skill [while collecting unemployment or disability] which is great, only the woman is 68 years old! She's perfectly willing, but the point is that anyone who is getting a 'free ride' from the government is scamming, because the government is not the poor folks' Sugar Daddy some people insist.
They can't afford to be, because the Pentagon & Defense Department have first dibs.
Anyone catch the article about how many billions of dollars the US taxpayers gave to Iraq that can't even be accounted for? Where's the outrage over the scams and fraud and waste and abuse and mismanagement by so called educated professionals who are paid [very highly] to account for the money?
Crickets.
 
Top