Are we in the third world yet?

louixo

Veteran Expediter
Charter Member
By Henry Briggs

Last week I referred to a joke from the Woody Harrelson character in “Friends with Benefits” (good flick, by the way): “The U.S. is the greatest country in the world... except for Germany, France, Belgium... thank God for Bangladesh!” The line got a great laugh.

One reader (from Bangladesh, I think) questioned the humor. Mr. Sarker defended Bangladesh, noting that the Sears Tower in Chicago was designed by a Bangladeshi structural engineer. I explained that Harrelson’s line referred to areas in which the U.S. is falling behind the rest of the world (education, infrastructure, indebtedness etc.). He still didn’t like the joke much but was very gracious about it.

I asked him to post his comments online but he demurred. Too bad. His superior command of English and writing alone underscores Harrelson’s line beautifully. It is a verbal reminder of U.S. fault lines.

Italy’s Berlusconi has nothing on New York’s Weiner or Oregon’s Wu.

The Tea Party’s fanaticism rivals that of any party in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The U.S. has the greatest disparity between rich and poor among industrialized nations.

To understand what happened, go west, young reader, go west. California leads the nation in a lot more than teen fashions. It seems to be a precursor of the current “default” debate.

50 years ago, when the U.S. was the envy of the world, California was its Garden of Eden. It had the best public schools, the best highway system, the best housing, the best... everything. Then came 1978’s tax revolt, Prop 13, which required property taxes never be higher than 1 percent of assessed value, unless authorized by 2/3 of California voters.

Municipalities run on property taxes the way trucks run on gas. Predictably, within a few years, California lost its forward momentum.

Instead of fixing the problem by revoking Prop 13, the legislature maintained its Garden of Eden status by borrowing. Today it ranked 26th in education, the highway system is barely keeping up and industry is leaving.

Once the sixth biggest economy, California is now teetering on default, pushed by a legislature that is intractable and infantile. It is followed in style and substance by the largest economy in the world, the U.S., and its equally ineffective legislature.

Here are just a few signs of our emerging Third World status:

Apple has more cash on hand than the U.S. government. Odds are it will hold its AAA rating longer too. Its computers work better. Its mail system is faster, better and more reliable.

Call Citibank or Hertz or hundreds of U.S. companies and the odds of talking to an EFL (English as First Language) person are slim to none. Call the U.S. government and, about half the time, you’ll get an EFL person all right, but one who can’t spell or add without a spellchecker or calculator.

We sell assault rifles to people from countries (where such guns are illegal) who use them to kill U.S. citizens.

Our citizens travel to other countries for medicine they can’t afford to buy in the U.S.

Our infant mortality rate is 34th in the world, below Portugal, New Caledonia, Brunei, Macau and other countries few Americans can find on a map or spell.

Tourists from other countries come here for the bargains. Foreigners (i.e. Brazilians) pay cash for real estate (i.e. Miami) on which U.S. citizens can’t even get mortgage approvals.

Politicians write laws to benefit their benefactors. Tax codes are designed by the connected for the connected.

A college education (with which the GI Bill helped launch an explosion of wealth 50 years ago) costs $100,000 to $200,000, money only available to the top-earning 20 percent of the country.

The gap between rich and poor in the U.S. is the widest since first measured in 1967, right around the time California was the Garden of Eden, the U.S. the land of promise and Bangladesh became a country.

Henry Briggs writes weekly for Main Line Media News.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
50 years ago, when the U.S. was the envy of the world, California was its Garden of Eden. It had the best public schools, the best highway system, the best housing, the best... everything. Then came 1978’s tax revolt, Prop 13, which required property taxes never be higher than 1 percent of assessed value, unless authorized by 2/3 of California voters.

Municipalities run on property taxes the way trucks run on gas. Predictably, within a few years, California lost its forward momentum.

Instead of fixing the problem by revoking Prop 13, the legislature maintained its Garden of Eden status by borrowing. Today it ranked 26th in education, the highway system is barely keeping up and industry is leaving.

Once the sixth biggest economy, California is now teetering on default, pushed by a legislature that is intractable and infantile. It is followed in style and substance by the largest economy in the world, the U.S., and its equally ineffective legislature
First, I don't blindly accept the assertion that California had the best of everything, but I'm sure things were better than now.

As for the abrupt change after Prop 13, the article leaves out a few very important things.

After Prop 13, the California legislature had the opportunity to abolish the practice of stealing from the productive and redistributing their wealth to people who had not earned it. Instead of accepting the message the taxpayers sent--that they would have no more of being taxed to oblivion--California not only perpetuated the lie of the Great Society, they accelerated the thievery and spending that makes it function.

Second, they introduced reams of laws and regulations that drove up the cost of doing business, lowering profits for businesses there, which in turn lowers tax revenue. It also drives businesses out of the state completely, which further lowers tax revenue and employment. Ever gone into a business in California and seen signs posted--signs the businesses are legally required to post--informing the public of services the state requires the business to provide, things over and above both what businesses in other states are required to provide, and reason itself? And there's a toll-free number to call if the gas station doesn't provide free air or whatever agency won't provide a translator to translate English to Outer Elbonian. Well, not really toll-free; the toll and call center expenses are paid for by--you guessed it--the taxpayers.

They exercise government power on things that are both foolish and unconstitutional. They have, in California, commissars and bureaus that you wouldn't imagine anyone would dream up.

And we haven't even addressed their compulsion involving feeding, clothing, doctoring, and educating every illegal that makes it there, and even sheltering them from the feds.

No, just like the federal government and its economic problems, the State of California foolishly ignores what most adults have figured out: that things must be paid for, and there's no genie or magic wand to grant you everything you want without the bill coming due.

Like the federal government's budget problems, it was caused by SPENDING more than they take in, on social programs that shouldn't exist in the first place.

"The problem with socialism is that eventually, be you run out of other people's money."--Margaret Thatcher

And now that it's happened, they're looking for someone else to blame. They just don't learn.
 
Last edited:

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
I live in CA and you are right on. It is not low property taxs that have ruined CA it is excessive regulation,and over-paid state employees. Correction officers in CA start at 90K a year. This is a job that should pay 35K to start, like most sheriff deputies.

To be frank I don't know how the rest of you afford homes. My property tax in CA is 1500.00 a year. I have been looking for a new state to live in and so far it has been awakening as to how cheap to own CA realestate is. In NY state as an example a house like mine would have 5000 a year in property tax. NH is double, SC is about 50% higher.

The property tax issue may be enough to have me stay in CA.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Italy’s Berlusconi has nothing on New York’s Weiner or Oregon’s Wu.

The problem with this is it is BS. Weiner and Wu both have not even approached Berlusconi's behavior and if you look at the truth, they resigned quickly because of their own while Berlusconi said ***** ** *** * ***

The Tea Party’s fanaticism rivals that of any party in Iraq or Afghanistan.


Really? I think this is an asinine statement to say the least. A group (tea party) who believes in their country and their constitution with passion rivals the Taliban or the many Iraqi groups who still have no direction or the entire country who don't care about the future.

The U.S. has the greatest disparity between rich and poor among industrialized nations.

Really not true. China, which is an industrialize nation has an issue with this which has been hidden. Their poor is poor, while our poor drive cars, have places to live and are FAT.

"The problem with conservatism is that eventually, be you run out of other people's money." - seems to be a true statement right now.
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
Italy’s Berlusconi has nothing on New York’s Weiner or Oregon’s Wu.

The problem with this is it is BS. Weiner and Wu both have not even approached Berlusconi's behavior and if you look at the truth, they resigned quickly because of their own while Berlusconi said ***** ** *** * ***

The Tea Party’s fanaticism rivals that of any party in Iraq or Afghanistan.


Really? I think this is an asinine statement to say the least. A group (tea party) who believes in their country and their constitution with passion rivals the Taliban or the many Iraqi groups who still have no direction or the entire country who don't care about the future.

The U.S. has the greatest disparity between rich and poor among industrialized nations.

Really not true. China, which is an industrialize nation has an issue with this which has been hidden. Their poor is poor, while our poor drive cars, have places to live and are FAT.

"The problem with conservatism is that eventually, be you run out of other people's money." - seems to be a true statement right now.



Their poor is poor, while our poor drive cars ,

Which is also their house :(
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Their poor is poor, while our poor drive cars ,

Which is also their house :(

Touche. For those not on gubmint assistance, maybe.

But honestly, the government does nothing to encourage not being poor. Welfare has always been the catalyst that makes people complacent to be poor.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Their poor is poor, while our poor drive cars ,

Which is also their house :(

OK ... I think Sue that there is a bit of a problem defining poor.

What we call poor have to do with statistics.

What we call homeless are those living in their cars.

There is a difference, we don't count the homeless like we should, dividing them up among mentally ill, those who actually have money but don't like to live with responsibility and those who just don't have a house and little money. Among those, many are living day by day, and the mentally ill of those sometimes refuse help - not that we don't have help.

While the poor are those who are under the 'poverty' level which is raised to include too many who are not poor. Those are the ones who seem to have enough money for cars or flatscreen TVs.
 

HarvOS

Active Expediter
If we become a third world country, the current third world will slip to fourth or fifth....
 
Top