Search results

Sometimes they don't even have to bother to count them ... like when they lost the eight precincts or whatever it was in IA ....

I'll take that as a compliment ;) Ahhh but Witness .... dontcha know ? ...... Faux News was vindicated .... completely ..... when an appeals court ruled that falsifying "news" is not against the law:

...... 'zactly ... that's why I was thinkin':

Yup .... This is a distinct possibility .... and I wouldn't be totally surprised if it were to occur .... But do keep in mind that most of the GOP kool-aid drinkers reading here are so imbued with their own seething hatred of Obama and the left/liberals that this will likely fall on very deaf...

Dave, Is this what you've been reduced to ..... the logical fallacy of ad hominem attacks, using implication and "guilt by association" ? (.... an association which could be described as tenuous at best ...) You're definitely off your game today ....

No fear ... it's more like disgust or revulsion .... I like to stay clean .... having to shower multiple times per day just doesn't float my boat .... Well, considering that he appeared in UCLA yesterday (record crowd - estimated at over 7,800), and CSU Chico a day or so before that (over...

I suspect some were paid more ... and some were paid less ... probably commensurate with their duties and time spent ... You have anything in the historical record to indicate that that would be the case and to back that up ? Or are you just engaging in (yet another) baseless smear ? Based on...

See my comments above .... Now .... try imagining what it would actually be like to live without being in a constant state of perpetual fear .... It is (needed) .... and would be (entertaining) indeed ;)

Dave, I'd personally like to thank you for posting on here .... it saves me from having to ever turn on Fox News .... and watch O'Reilly, The Five, or any of those other dolts deliver their talking points .... It is somewhat more tolerable (and less malignant) just reading it ... Ron Paul...

Nope ... not necessarily .... People may not support Dr. Paul because they are against the philosophy he espouses and stands for .... or any other number of reasons that one could possibly imagine .... I recall one (so-called) "conservative" on here arguing (essentially) that a strict...

Thanks Dennis ... that one got me laughing after I read it quoted ... ;) Wasn't one of my better grammatical constructions to be sure ... :rolleyes: Yup :D

All flash and style .... and no real substance ... BTW - I can't - I'm already maxed out for this cycle .... .... but you can bet that in the general, when the limits reset, I'll dig deep ....

I wonder if you would care to illustrate for us all the ratio of monies that anyone who is related to Dr. Paul has received from the Paul campaign as compared to the amount of funds raised overall ? I suspect not .... for it is probably on the order of less than 1% .... Well, after 2008 I...

Is your understanding of the political arena really that simplistic and narrow ? It's all about "getting a job" .... really ? I assume that given your background you will be familiar with the following premise: You (very likely) have no standing .... The above coming someone who regularly...

jimmy, Got it. The entire subject (and history) of "money" is an interesting one indeed ... I wasn't familiar with term ("fiat money") until relatively late in my life ... and I think that is probably true for many as well ..... which is kinda odd when one thinks about it, given the fact that...

A huge, simplistic generality ... which apparently attempts to conflate all the motivations of a good size group of people as being entirely the same .... and makes no distinction or differentiation between them whatsoever .... This, of course, is about the lowest form of computation that the...

Which - his position ? ...... or the factual circumstances re: the Fed on which his stance is based ? Previously ? .... or now ?

Yeah, sure .... exactly .... after all, there aren't any possibly valid reasons that one might want to hire and employ people one could actually trust in politics:

Butterball posits the following: For the math challenged: $300,000 divided by 6 (family members) = $50,000.00 (per family member) $50,000.00 (per family member) divided by 4 (plus ?) years = $12,500 per year, (per family member) .... Yup .... they're really rakin' it in .... :rolleyes: Epic...

Well, at least you managed to avoid making it post it twice .... :rolleyes: The details are rather trivial and inane ..... although it does show what real transparency actually looks like ... Nah ... what I am really enjoying is watching details emerge on the delegate process as it unfolds...