Search results

Yup .... I put in a Sterling Alternator-powered Intelligent Battery Charger to charge the auxiliary bank. What it does is take the alternator output and and hold the voltage down (on the alternator side of the charger) to boost the amperage output of the alternator. The unit then takes this...

Heheheh .... yeah .... I looked at the price of 4/0 cable after I concurred .... looks to be around $8/ft currently .... Back when I bought the 2/0 (4+ years ago) it was a little under $4/ft (including shipping) The lugs ain't cheap either .... fortunately, if all you are doing is running a...

Given the distance involved, I would concur. I'm using 2/0 on about a 4' or 5' run feeding a 2000w AIMS Pure Sign Inverter. My microwave would seem to be a similar size to 'Hawk's (it's a small Magic Chef) ..... and while I no longer run the microwave with the vehicle off as a matter of...

Yup, it is .... about as big a round as my thumb. I used Cobra X-Flex 2/0 .... very finely stranded (1200+) and very flexible. Cost around $135 for 35' .... the correct Panduit cable lugs for it cost about double that ($300+ .... but that was to wire everything, including the power from the...

Fifteen feet .... not inches ....

I'd be using 2/0 at a minimum (what I'm using on about 5' run, same size inverter) .... with that much length 4/0 would be better.

Turned ? This would appear to suggest that you equate criticism of government, its agencies, and policies and actions - particularly by those who were formerly part of it - as akin to being a traitor or something .... which is a rather odd premise, given it is not only an citizen's right to do...

That's an observation you might wish to take personal advantage of and put into practice yourself.

This is a very funny statement (although not entirely surprising given the source) .... considering that it's coming from someone who evidently self-identifies as "conservative" .... International protocol ? Screw that - I'm talking about good old fundamental US Constitutional law .... you...

Internet, Shminternet .... I heard it on Fox News .... :rolleyes:

The blower motor is in front of the cabin air filter and so is in an unfiltered airstream and is subject to whatever dirt, dust, and debris comes in. There are two bearings in the motor - oilite bushings I think - that may be dry (introducing drag) .... lubing one of them (WD-40) is possible...

Nope, it's not wrong - and no amount of burying your head in the sand and being unwilling to acknowledge what is a fact (by virtue of the US being a signatory to the Convention, which was ratified and thereby was made law ..... by virtue of the very Constitution which you so endearing profess...

FWIW: Frequently Asked Questions Q: When did Antiwar.com start? A: At the end of 1995, the editors registered the domain name Antiwar.com. The site only became a full-time effort with the beginning of the US intervention in Kosovo. After the conflict became larger and more horrific, our...

This acknowledgement at least forms a starting point or basis for a rational discussion. Do you believe in the "rule of law" as a fundamental principle for the basis of society ?

Just a little further comment on "sources" and the use of one's (presumably) God-given intelligence in determining what (or who) the actual source of something is: While it is true that I linked to anti-war.com, the actual, original source of the article is the author of it - an individual -...

Sorry but that's wrong .... (torture, not Jesus) In fact, some of it, is torture .... a fact that we as a nation agreed to, and legally ratified .... thereby making it illegal - IOW, a crime: United_Nations_Convention_Against_Torture Just because one "likes" some of criminal perps who...

LOL ..... yeah .... but what about elsewhere .... ?

Correct. Did you vet all the donors who supplied funding for the source that reported that ? Or did you (for some odd reason, unbeknownst to us all here) just accept it at face value ? :rolleyes: In any event, your characterization appears to conflict with what was reported: WaPo (and...

Yes - and my point - which goes back to your original statement - was that it's fairly ignorant for someone (not you particularly) assume that banner ads necessarily imply in any way an endorsement of what is being advertised. I would say it largely is, based on my own personal observations.

Who is "they" ? (as in "their supporters")