Search results

Then assuming that those kids were sent there by choice, knowing that they could exempt themselves from the R.E. , for what reason were they sent there OTHER than to cause trouble? There was no NEED for the issue to come up.

IF I remember correctly BTU's is what we used to determine how much fuel it took to move a given weight. The fewer BTU's per pound the more efficient. When I asked the engineers at JPL this question they agreed. Same when I dealt with Morton Thiokol and LockheedMartin. They always determined...

What about the school itself? Is it a school that one sends their kids there by choice or are they just sent there, like a neighborhood school?

Did they send some kids into that school just to cause trouble?

Hope dinner was good, no need to be sorry about eating! IF they don't like the form of Religious Education, then why send your kids there in the first place? Establish your own school to teach as you like. I smell a rat.

If they did not like what was taught there why did they send their kids there to start with? It is not a mandatory type school.

Confused, why a religious teacher there? You can get any kind of illegal weapon you want in any country. Yep, it stopped violence. They beat him like that to teach a lesson, other wise, if it suited their needs, they would have shot him or blown him up with illegal explosives that were...

What kind of school was this?

No, not the same person.

Thanks for the info, I am looking at many things right now. I will add that to the list. Time for changes.

Or just justify it by admitting to being a foul mouthed, rude pig and go away. Polite people, people of character don't do what he, and many others, do in the name of entertainment. There is no valid reason to act like that in public.

Never claimed my math was worth a doodally. The is only one way to determine fuel efficiency that is when you use less fuel to move the exact same vehicle or weight. a 1000LB car gets 15MPG The same exact 1000LB is "monkeyed" with and now gets 22MPG. It is now more fuel efficient...

Yep, pick up trucks and boats too. Fact is, NO car on the market uses as little fuel, PER POUND OF VEHICLE, to move it as my truck does. It is all about how much fuel to move equal amounts of weight. Geez, guys, JPL knows this, so does NASA, Boeing etc, you should too!

My truck weighs 30,000 empty and get 10MPG. What would a car get if it used fuel the same way? What car gets 300MPG?

My truck weighs 30,000 empty and get 10MPG. What would a car get if it used fuel the same way? What car gets 300MPG?

PA has been drilling for gas and oil on state forest and state game land my entire life. No real adverse affects. The State has made a TON of money. Too bad that they keep wasting it. It is not that difficult to recover the resources without much interference to nature and man. Drill...

Too bad these are all "dink" cars you are talking about. I won't be impressed until I see the same fuel to weight ratios in cars as I see on my expediters. It takes far less fuel, per pound, to move my truck than any car on the market.

The luck is that way across the board.

Claim filed. $1000.00 deductible.

"What if we do drill, we are looking at 8 years of exploration to find a viable source but before we get one drop of oil the emotion of the market will see we are moving toward producing without producing and the market may drop or on the other hand it may caused the market to go up a lot. THIS...