Search results

She said she wasn't doing another term, but that is all I heard.

Rates are real good for the local stuff. Not so much for outbound. Seem less on the outbound verses a few weeks ago. Too much capacity sitting in there trying to get out. Charge accordingly if going in.

Enlighten me. What do you think that "reality" is? I hope it isn't just more "free stuff". I want to hear your definition. Not what you think may be wrong with mine.

To win at a national level it is apparent they will have to do quite a bit more than that.

Most large companies are now international verses 20 years ago. Their function isn't to invest in the US for anything other than profit. A company owned by the Japanese are worried about their own country before they are going to worry about anything here. One market dries up, they move to another.

We got what the message was. But...money and candy win the race. BTW...the dems raised more money in this election, but I am sure you knew that.

Entitlements are really two seperate issues. Social security in which people paid in to it are certainly entitled to it. The problem comes when their costs outweigh what they have put in. Simple math. That is why it is basically broke. Other entitlements that were designed for short term use...

If it just stopped there that would probably be one thing. Most of the "free stuff" starts small and swells into massive government programs. Someone at some level will sue because someone got it for free and they want it as well.

You have a shrinking tax base with more people pulling from it through entitlements all the way to home mortgages. Cut the crazy spending will net the favorable long term results. As mentioned, just not enough rich people any more to float the boat.

Is this a good idea at taxpayers expense? San Francisco to provide transgender surgeries for uninsured | Fox News

Independants, libertarian or anything close wouldn't stand a chance for lack of money. The closest was Ross Perot at roughly 19 percent. That was using much of his own money. This last election I'm not sure he would have broke five percent because of all the money invested from the dems and...

If they aren't competitive then they are insignificant. If you add all those votes to the republican ticket it still isn't enough.

Funny you mention that. I heard something the other day about Texas wanting to jump ship. Just heard it in passing. Don't know any of the details.

Ok. one percent to two percent still makes them insignificant. Even if they go to five percent, same problem. I like quite a few of the libertarian positions but that is much different whether they could even remotely compete on a national level. There is nothing out there that even suggests...

Always different opinions on this type of topic. No need to turn it into a personal name calling exercise when one differs.

I would say we have and continue to stray from anything you mentioned in that quote.

I would say at least in the short term, we won't go in without a load or revenue back out. Some freight coming out but it don't match the available trucks sitting. Profitable for some of the carriers, but for us the fuel would be too high to DH out on their (Sylectus) posted rate. The...

Care to explain what this "movement" is?

What movement? Did I miss something?

Libertarians only bumped up a little (very little) because the other candidates were that bad. Not anywhere close to even being competitive. Could that change? Not likely. Just don't have the candidates or cash to compete.