chefdennis
Veteran Expediter
Think barry is working to preserve our country and for what is in the best interest of our nation!?!? think again, he is working to sell our country out to a one world governing body and he hopes to be at the helm....You supporters of this person in the wh are to be thanked...for your ignorance and for giving away our way of life....
Here are 3 articles from 3 different writers telling what barry is doing, but you gutless supporters of barry are all ok with what he is doing....or so it seems, since you no longer will voice your support or oppostion...so in that way of thinking, we have to figure you are all ok with what your messiah is doing......
Lord Monckton Says Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5d...layer_embedded
US hopes to strike climate deal with India
by Indo Asian News Service on October 15, 2009
What Lord Monckton Said At Dinner . . .
Written by Kirsten Lombard Saturday, 17 October 2009 00:31
Here are 3 articles from 3 different writers telling what barry is doing, but you gutless supporters of barry are all ok with what he is doing....or so it seems, since you no longer will voice your support or oppostion...so in that way of thinking, we have to figure you are all ok with what your messiah is doing......
Lord Monckton Says Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5d...layer_embedded
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel University in St. Paul, MN. In this 4 minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty, scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.
Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate to which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in-favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educating the public about the myth of global warming. served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate to which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in-favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educating the public about the myth of global warming.
(I found this on another board)
"Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:"
"...At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.
[laughter]
And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.
So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not...."
US hopes to strike climate deal with India
by Indo Asian News Service on October 15, 2009
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------London, Oct 15 (IANS) The US is hoping to get a commitment from India to fight global warming, the Guardian newspaper reported Thursday.
The Obama administration is hoping to win these new commitments from both India and China in back-to-back summits next month, it said, adding that the commitments may include India’s first scheme to trade emissions of greenhouse gases that are leading to climate change.
The US hopes the new commitments will breathe life into the moribund negotiations to seal a global treaty on climate change in Copenhagen in December, by setting out what action each country will take. But many observers say such bilateral deals also risk seriously weakening any Copenhagen agreement by allowing the idea of a global limit on greenhouse gas emissions to be abandoned.
Barack Obama will meet China’s President Hu Jintao in Beijing Nov 16-17 before playing host to Manmohan Singh at the White House Nov 24. The newspaper said the visits appear timed to provide a much-needed boost to a proposed law to reduce US emissions now before the Senate, as well as to the Copenhagen talks.
The US wants to move away from a legally binding global agreement to one where individual countries pledge cuts in their national emissions, it reported, adding that the US State Department envoy, Todd Stern, believes strongly that separate bilateral agreements with countries such as China, India, Russia and Brazil are the building blocks to an agreement at Copenhagen.
But adoption of national action plans is hazardous, say others, as there would be little clear idea of whether together they would avoid dangerous global warming.
‘China and India are both critically important to achieving our international goals on carbon reduction. We need them as part the system,’ Senator Ben Cardin, a Maryland Democrat who serves on the foreign and environment and public works committees, told the newspaper. ‘There has already been a lot of work done between US and China, and there is going to be more work done next month with President Obama going to China.’
‘We are going to introduce a domestic cap-and-trade programme, but the cap will be on energy intensity, not carbon,’ said Minister of State for Environment and Forests Jairam Ramesh.
He said the legislation to establish the scheme would be introduced before Singh’s visit to Washington, with a vote in parliament by the end of the year.
New moves from India and China would help Obama at home, where his Democratic allies in the Senate face a tough struggle trying to pass a climate change bill to cut US emissions.
‘It is pretty clear to everyone in the US that bilateral agreements with India and China that are new and additional will help secure climate legislation in the US,’ said John Coequyt, who heads the climate programme at the Sierra Club. ‘The big advantage of doing it in (bilateral) form is that it makes sense to members of Congress.’
http://trak.in/news/us-hopes-to-stri...-report/14373/
Here is a link to the UN treaty to be signed in December
http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/conten...eaty-legal.pdf
Climate change agreements:translation- ceeding soverign control of the US to the UN- this treaty overrules our constitution
What Lord Monckton Said At Dinner . . .
Written by Kirsten Lombard Saturday, 17 October 2009 00:31
http://www.rightsidenews.com/2009101...at-dinner.htmlOn Monday, October 12th, I was extremely privileged to spend time with Lord Christopher Monckton and his wife, Lady Juliet Monckton. You never know the unexpected ways in which God will bless you. In passing the evening with this exceptional couple, I was doubly blessed not only by the pleasure of their excellent company but also by their clear insight into matters of great import--matters that have the potential utterly to destroy the sovereignty of the United States. This entry recounts what Lord and Lady Monckton shared with myself and others over the course of a pre-lecture dinner conversation. His Lordship also worked a portion of this information into his talk at the University of Wisconsin-Madison later that evening.
MONCKTON_CD_thumbLord Monckton is one of the few people who has thorough familiarity with a recently completed draft of the treaty President Obama will sign in Copenhagen in just a matter of weeks. He does not mince words about what he has found in the course of his reading of the document.
The treaty is not just a foot in the door for one-world government. It IS communist, one-world government. And because of the high regard in which our Constitution holds foreign treaties, this document, if ratified by Congress, would supercede the Constitution.
The treaty will, of course, be signed under the banner of coming together internationally to "save the environment" through the reduction of carbon emissions. Except, oh dear, cat's out of the bag...global warming is a giant lie.
While Lord Monckton has become one of the most visible and vocal apologists for this fact, he is hardly alone. MANY credible scientists with solidly conducted research to back them up, have revealed the meme of human-caused climate change as a complete farce.
With wealth comes a cleaner environment. When nations have money
and a sense of civic responsibility--such as that present in this nation--they tend to clean up after themelves. Even if global warming, or "climate change," were a reality, the United States and other Western nations could never, in honesty, be called the world's most egregious polluters (I'm sure we all have an awareness of who would be on that list). Except, that's exactly how this treaty labels us. And in so labeling, not only does it attempt to rob us of our sovereignty, it also wants to drain us of our wealth via a huge reparations scam. As the "big polluters," we will be forced to pay a substantial portion of our GDP to the Third World for "ruining the environment." If we do not pony up, we will be subject to even heavier penalties under international law. As I understand it from Lord Monckton, the treaty implements its chains very cleverly and on many levels. It will bind us more closely, for example, to other organizations of dubious reputation and merit such as the UN, the IMF, and the World Bank. We will be surrounded and pinned.
We have all watched redistribution of wealth occurring on an international scale for some time now. TARP involved the transfer of billions of dollars to other nations. But this treaty would RATIONALIZE, INSTITUTIONALIZE, and ACCELERATE the redistribution.
To be abundantly clear, the American people will have no voice or say in this matter--or likely many others--once the treaty is signed. Lord Monckton expressed very frankly that the words democracy, electorate, and voting are conspicuously absent from the treaty language. This document is intended to make America powerless and poor.
THE COPENHAGEN TREATY MUST NOT BE RATIFIED!!!
The Copenhagen conference is scheduled for early December. We have only a few short weeks to educate our fellow Americans and make a very loud noise to our wily legislators so that they do not end up enslaving us through a foolish or underhanded vote against U.S. sovereignty.
The best place to start is to become familiar with the content of the treaty draft itself, which you can find here.
Also, arm yourself with facts on the matter of climate change. Lord Monckton is, of course, an excellent source. Many organizations, such as the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) and Americans for Prosperity (AFP) frequently offer free copies of Monckton's 2007 video, Apocalypse? No! The video doesn't contain all the most recent ****ing science, but it's an excellent start. His Lordship is very engaging. You won't be bored.
You can also view Lord Monckton's October 14th, 2009 lecture at Bethel College in St. Paul, MN here.
Or read the text of one of his lectures here.
Glenn Beck's Arguing with Idiots also contains some well-constructed, pithy arguments against the climate change lie. If you haven't picked up a copy, I recommend it. Marvelous tool.
As we are reading, let us also be passing this information on to everyone else we can lay hands on...including well-meaning but misguided greenies. Not all of them are hard-core idealogues. If those who are simply misguided could see where this will take us--the crushing cost to our freedom and our finances--they might begin to take a different view of what they have been told is best for them--indeed, what is "best" all of us.
There is much we can do. Let us work together...as quickly and as effectively as we can.
One team, one goal: Stop the Madness.
