Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at Ris

ACW4478

Expert Expediter
Why we need oversight! CSPAN has the video of the hearing http://www.c-span.org/

Here is a short clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv3MDlggwcA

Sept. 18, 2006, 11:35PM
Halliburton ignored dangers, drivers say


By DAVID IVANOVICH
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - Halliburton Co. officials knew a highway intersection near Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison was fraught with danger hours before the deadly ambush of a truck convoy known as the Good Friday Massacre, former company truck drivers told Democratic senators Monday.

And the Houston-based contracting giant may have tried to shield itself from lawsuits by including a clause in an application for a Defense of Freedom Medal, in which survivors would sign away their rights to sue, according to a document unveiled by the panel Monday.

"That is almost an unbelievable piece of paper," said Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-S.D., chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee.

Asked about the clause, Halliburton spokeswoman Cathy Mann said: "It was never KBR's intention to utilize any such release to preclude claims by current or former employees against the company. And we have no intention of doing so in the future."

Appearing before Dorgan's panel of Democrats, former workers accused Halliburton subsidiary KBR of sending unarmed civilians into an area they had been warned was the site of attacks by insurgents.

"One question haunts me: Why would KBR/Halliburton knowingly send unarmed noncombatant civilians in military tankers down a closed road where there was an ongoing battle?" said Ed Sanchez of Silver City, N.M., who survived the Good Friday Massacre.

Six KBR truck drivers and two soldiers were killed in that ambush. Another driver and one soldier are still listed as missing.

The leader of the convoy, Tommy Hamill, was kidnapped. He later escaped.

Mann said Halliburton's "priority has always been the safety and security of its employees, regardless of where they work around the world.

"The U.S. military," Mann added, "has command and control of all KBR convoys in Iraq, such as supplying pre-trip threat assessments and determining routes, and is required to provide security for KBR's employees through the company's contract with the Army."


Giving a warning
Sean Larvenz, a former civilian convoy commander for Halliburton subsidiary KBR, told the panel he had driven near that same intersection near Baghdad International Airport the morning of April 9, 2004.

Larvenz's convoy was attacked by small-arms fire, mortars and rocket-propelled grenades.

He said he could see mortar fire landing in the road at the interchange of two main supply routes, called Tampa and Sword. Over his radio, he could hear the sound of explosions and the chatter of drivers as their convoys were attacked.

Larvenz sent a text message to company managers warning of the danger.

"There is absolutely no question in my mind that ... KBR/Halliburton was aware of the hostilities that existed at the juncture," he said.

Three hours later, Sanchez's convoy, trying to deliver jet fuel to the airport, came under attack in the same area.

Sanchez told senators he was shot twice but managed to help two other truck drivers escape. During the attack his tanker truck caught fire, and Sanchez and the others had to abandon the vehicle.

When he was picked up by a military Humvee crowded with survivors he was handed an M-16.

"I fired that weapon for the first time in my life," he said.


Appears in a movie
Sanchez is one of the former Halliburton workers who appear in a recently released film, Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers, directed by Robert Greenwald, who also produced The Crooked E: The Unshredded Truth about Enron. The film had its Houston-area theatrical release on Sept. 8.

Sanchez, along with other survivors of the ambush and family members of those who were killed, have filed suit against Halilburton in U.S. District Court in Houston.

Mann could not comment on the lawsuit, except to say that "Halliburton and KBR deny any allegations of wrongdoing and fully intend to vigorously defend our position."

T. Scott Allen Jr., a Houston-based attorney handling the case, said Halliburton is trying to get the case dismissed.


Release from liability
The panel also unveiled a letter from Halliburton's government operations office in Houston sent in November 2004 to one survivor of the ambush, Ray Stannard of El Paso.

Enclosed with the letter was a "medical records release form" which "authorizes me to share your medical records with the Pentagon Review Board for the purposes of awarding you the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom."

The Defense of Freedom award, the civilian equivalent of a Purple Heart, was inaugurated in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to recognize civilians hurt or killed while aiding the military.

"You most certainly qualify," the letter assured Stannard.

Clause 9 of the form, however, would release KBR and the military "from any and all claims and any and all causes of action ... I may have against any of them."

Stannard could not be reached for immediate comment.

Democrats held the hearing on their own, arguing Republicans who control the Senate have showed little interest in pursuing the issues.

[email protected]

Former KBR/Halliburton employees Sean Larvenz, left, Edward Sanchez and Julie McBride, right, and McBride's lawyer Alan Grayson, testify before the Senate Democratic Policy Committee during a hearing about contracting abuses in Iraq on Monday on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
 

Aviator

Expert Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

Ummm, you take a job in a war zone... and you might get shot / killed.


Aviator
 

ACW4478

Expert Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

Well I guess you didn't watch the hearings. They were fed a line of BS and believed it. Told they would be kept out of harm's way – forced to drive into battle zones unprotected; mercenaries used for combat operations and interrogations and soldiers training civilians to, ultimately, outsource their own jobs at much higher salaries so that friends of the administration can rake in obscene profits.

Here is a trailer of the documentary coming out about these truckers.

http://iraqforsale.org/trailer.php?track=crooksandliars
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

I'm mixed on this. Part of me says yes they were screwed. They should've had adequate protection, both personal and for the convoy (including ground and air escorts).

And part of me recognizes that there have always been war profiteers. Ever hear of the Rothchilds? They got their millions from financing BOTH sides of the Napoleanic War. Nothing new what Halliburton is doing. What steams me is that these ppl trusted a company, just like ppl like them trust JBHunt and Swift. Was it in their contracts that this or that would be supplied to them, then wasn't? I'm sure there was a lot of legaleze in those contracts to protect Halliburton from wrongdoing.

Fact of the matter is both sides are wrong. There is a moral obligation for Halliburton to do what they can to protect the ppl working for them. And, if morality isn't enough, there's the fallout that something like this could and WOULD happen, both financially and in the court of public opinion. On the other side, did these drivers think it would all be peaches and cream? Come on... you're in a WAR ZONE! To trust a company to have your best interest at heart? They obviously believed the JBs and Swifts.

"If I claim to be a wise man, it surely means that I don't know." - Kansas
 

ACW4478

Expert Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

The thing that is really upsetting is that we have Heavy Equipment Drivers in the Armed Forces and the Government decided to outsource this to Halliburton. Soldiers training civilians to do the job of the Military at much higher salaries, and at the expense of the tax payer. Soldiers often find themselves working next to contractors who make ten times more money than the troops. The average enlisted service member makes roughly $25,000 a year compared to a civilian contractor, who can make up to $200,000 a year. This is unfair. The soldiers deserve better.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

ACW4478

Hate to burst your bubble, but some of the hearing is a bunch of BS.

First you apparently never applied to any of these jobs, I have and the first time was back in 2003 when I got laid off. The words "a large percentage of being hurt or killed will be probable" was used a few times and we (the group I was with going through the process) were told a lot more of the risks - nothing was said to us that we were going to enjoy our stay in Iraq. This was as we were invading Iraq, not two or three years later.
 

ACW4478

Expert Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

"First you apparently never applied to any of these jobs, I have and the first time was back in 2003 when I got laid off."

Using your same thinking, Well, since I applied and served in the Military during the first Gulf War and you have never. I guess you have no idea what your talking about when it comes Defense issues.
 

Aviator

Expert Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

I have done 18 years in the Military, AND worked as a contrator. And, I still think your ideas are way way off base ACW. I often find people on the left, when unable to back up any kind of argument, resort to name calling. Either the person they are debating, OR whoever they are angry at. Not a very effective form of debate.


Aviator
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
RE: Truckers Testify That Halliburton Put Lives at

Thanks Aviator.

ACW4478
I have a hard time when people call me names like this.

Chickenhawk, ok.

I guess that you have no clue of what I would do for my country. I know I would not .. well never mind.
I stand by the statement that I made, you apparently did not apply for a contracting job and you only know what you read or hear but not experienced. What I know is through experience, not listening to someone who wants their 15 minutes of fame.

Have you ever been to a congressional hearing? It is a dog and pony show with people who want to appear on cspan or see their name in print.

As for military knowledge, well you got me there. I have absolute no military knowledge! Yep all I know is from the Armchair General, Armchair Diplomat, Armchair Politician magazines and the Republican Party - Yea right.

If I told you the truth, you would not believe me anyway so why bother.

Sorry ACW4478, I might know a little more than what you think I know and it may really surprise you, you know? What I did learn provided me an insight into what is going on in the world and provide me a solid foundation that I could build on for the military knowledge I have and could ever accumulate in the future.
 
Top