The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
LOL ... too bad Cheeto didn't appoint him as AG instead of the Keebler Elf ... aka Jefferson "Butterscotch" Sessions ...
Think he's got buyer's remorse ?
That you know of ...
Did you ever read that indictment ?
Nothing ... that you know of anyways.
You betcha ... and he'll keep going until he gets to the bottom of it ...
Cheeto is so screwed ...
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Australian diplomat whose tip prompted FBI's Russia-probe has tie to Clintons
Probably just another coincidence.
From article:
Downer, now Australia's ambassador to London, provided the account of a conversation with Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos at a London bar in 2016 that became the official reason the FBI opened the Russia counterintelligence probe.
But lawmakers say the FBI didn't tell Congress about Downer's prior connection to the Clinton Foundation. Republicans say they are concerned the new information means nearly all of the early evidence the FBI used to justify its election-year probe of Trump came from sources supportive of the Clintons, including the controversial Steele dossier.
Probably just another coincidence.
From article:
Downer, now Australia's ambassador to London, provided the account of a conversation with Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos at a London bar in 2016 that became the official reason the FBI opened the Russia counterintelligence probe.
But lawmakers say the FBI didn't tell Congress about Downer's prior connection to the Clinton Foundation. Republicans say they are concerned the new information means nearly all of the early evidence the FBI used to justify its election-year probe of Trump came from sources supportive of the Clintons, including the controversial Steele dossier.
Would have been leaked if so. They leak like a sieve.LOL ... too bad Cheeto didn't appoint him as AG instead of the Keebler Elf ... aka Jefferson "Butterscotch" Sessions ...
Think he's got buyer's remorse ?
That you know of ...
Did you ever read that indictment ?
Nothing ... that you know of anyways.
You betcha ... and he'll keep going until he gets to the bottom of it ...
Cheeto is so screwed ...
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Some may be wishcasting about Trump's demise.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
I take it you don't actually get the potential legal significance of those 13 indictments then, in terms of the broader picture ?
That sounds like some of Sham's circular reasoning ...They may eventually find something just because it looks like they will have to get creative after all this time. Now we want to try 2015 emails. lmao
Oh ... I'm sure we will ...
Just watch Sham Flamnity's head ... when it explodes you'll know Bobby has hit the mother lode ...
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Last edited:
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Watch: Sam Nunberg defying Mueller gets cross-examined on live TV
Doesn't seem to care much for The Cheeto these days ...
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Thanks. As far as I know, the intercepts were first reported by The Guardian.
Quit bono. Mueller's team, so yeah they leak.No actual evidence of that.
Someone tried to substantiate that assertion once, couldn't really make the case ...
Probably a substantial portion of the planet's population ...
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
It was reported on November 7, 2016 ... but GCHQ wasn't specifically stated, just described as actionable intelligence from friendly foreign sources ...
EXCLUSIVE: FBI 'Granted FISA Warrant' Covering Trump Camp's Ties To R…
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Last edited:
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
To quote the legal expert and scholar Vincent Laguardia Gambini...
View attachment 17096
wait....
OK
Potentially serves to establish an underlying crime for which an obstruction of justice charge can be laid and prosecuted.
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Yes of coarse. When there isn't any collusion, concoct a cockamanie obstruction of justice case.To quote the legal expert and scholar Vincent Laguardia Gambini...
View attachment 17096
wait....
OK
Potentially serves to establish an underlying crime for which an obstruction of justice charge can be laid and prosecuted.
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Aside from the fact that obstruction is itself a crime and doesn't require any other underlying crimes, I'm still munching popcorn. There is nothing in those indictments that could possibly establish an underlying crime for collusion, either.
Why they leak. Reporters won't reveal source. So risk minimal.From U2 ?
No real benefit ... plus huge downside risk (illegal)
So no ... probably not.
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Make of it what you will:
Mueller ‘has the documents’ on agreement between Trump and Russian interests during the 2016 campaign: GOP strategist
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Mueller ‘has the documents’ on agreement between Trump and Russian interests during the 2016 campaign: GOP strategist
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
You can count on one hand how many people who have been prosecuted for leaks, at least those for non-classified leaks. Leaking classified material will get you in trouble, tho. But, the biggest risk most people face when leaking is, at most, losing their job. So, with few exceptions, even when the source is revealed, the risk is pretty minimal.
Instead of asking "What's the benefit?" it's more applicable to ask "Who benefits?" or, usually more importantly, "What's the motivation?"
The benefit is easy enough to see on its own. It's either the truth, or exposes something that needs to be exposed, or exposes a process that needs to be changed, or it ends up with no real benefit whatsoever.
But it's the motivation that is usually the most important. The motivations run the gamut from admiral altruism to straight-up revenge.
Agree. Every SP team that there has been leaked one time or another during their investigation. I just saw some of the footage of the Clinton years on Fox a little while ago. One of the SP investigators admitted to leaking so as to respond to the continuing criticism from the executive branch at the time. He said it was necessary.
But we are to believe that Mueller's team(who had at least TWO leakers on it for about three months...that we know about)hasn't leaked.
Yeah. Not buying it.
But we are to believe that Mueller's team(who had at least TWO leakers on it for about three months...that we know about)hasn't leaked.
Yeah. Not buying it.