So you are Pro Life....

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
and you for one reason or another end up having to go to the gov for barrycare.....well no matter where you stand on abortion, you WILL be paying for it if harry has his way...


Sen. Reid’s Government-Run Health Plan Requires a Monthly Abortion Fee

Posted by GOP Leader Press Office
November 19th, 2009
Republican Leader John Boehner | Sen. Reid?s Government-Run Health Plan Requires a Monthly Abortion Fee

Just like the original 2,032-page, government-run health care plan from Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-NV) massive, 2,074-page bill would levy a new “abortion premium” fee on Americans in the government-run plan.

Beginning on line 7, p. 118, section 1303 under “Voluntary Choice of Coverage of Abortion Services” the Health and Human Services Secretary is given the authority to determine when abortion is allowed under the government-run health plan. Leader Reid’s plan also requires that at least one insurance plan offered in the Exchange covers abortions (line 13, p. 120).

What is even more alarming is that a monthly abortion premium will be charged of all enrollees in the government-run health plan. It’s right there beginning on line 11, page 122, section 1303, under “Actuarial Value of Optional Service Coverage.” The premium will be paid into a U.S. Treasury account – and these federal funds will be used to pay for the abortion services.

Section 1303(a)(2)(C) describes the process in which the Health Benefits Commissioner is to assess the monthly premiums that will be used to pay for elective abortions under the government-run health plan and for those who are given an affordability credit to purchase insurance coverage that includes abortion through the Exchange. The Commissioner must charge at a minimum $1 per enrollee per month.

A majority of Americans believe that health care plans should not be mandated to provide elective abortion coverage, and a majority of Americans do not believe government health care plans should include abortion coverage. Currently, federal appropriations bills include language known as the Hyde Amendment that prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for elective abortions under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, while another provision, known as the Smith Amendment, prohibits federal funding of abortion under the federal employees’ health benefits plan.

Leader Reid’s 2,074-page health care monstrosity is an affront to the American people and drastically moves away from current policy. The National Right to Life Committee has called the Reid abortion language “completely unacceptable.” The American people deserve more from their government than being forced to pay for abortion. The pro-life Stupak/Pitts amendment passed the House by a vote of 240 to 194, enjoying the overwhelming support of 176 Republicans and 64 Democrats. The Stupak/Pitts Amendment codifies current law by prohibiting federal funding of elective abortions under any government-run plan or plans available under the Exchange. The Reid plan ignores the will of a bipartisan majority of the House, and indeed the American people, by rejecting this bipartisan amendment.

Health care reform should not be used as an opportunity to use federal funds to pay for elective abortions. Health reform should be an opportunity to protect human life – not end it – and the American people agree. House Republicans have offered a common-sense, responsible solution that would reduce health care costs and expand access while protecting the dignity of all human life. The Republican plan, available at HealthCare.GOP.gov, would codify the Hyde Amendment and prohibit all authorized and appropriated federal funds from being used to pay for abortion. And under the Republican plan, any health plan that includes abortion coverage may not receive federal funds.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Letz wrote;

Tax payers paying for abortions isn't anything new..

No it isn't, but taxpayers being forced to buy insurance that has a built in "FEE" to pay for abortion or for care for anyone else is certain new....remember this is NOT a tax...this is a product that the gov id forcing the people to buy...then charging more to pay for others coverage....
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
i know it isn't new and we do...i said " no it isn't"....to letz responce....but again, we are NOT talking a tax ...the gov has made that clear....this is a FEE....to be seperated from Premimums and strictly to fund abortions.....
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I know you are talking about the bill but we already pay for this with my taxes and my 'contribution' to Medicare pays for it.

Just like my contribution pays for fertility treatments and other very expensive things for those on Medicare who are under 50.
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
In a weird, twisted way, the proposed new healthcare plan, if passed, might possibly lessen the amount of abortions being paid for by tax payers. If you believe that "rationing" will take place, and I believe something like that will take place, I expect a limit will be put on who will get them and how many will be paid for...
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
I know you are talking about the bill but we already pay for this with my taxes and my 'contribution' to Medicare pays for it.

Just like my contribution pays for fertility treatments and other very expensive things for those on Medicare who are under 50.

I don't mean to nitpick, as I get your point, but I think you mean Medicade, not Medicare. Medicare is only for those 65 and older, with the exception of those younger who suffer from kidney failure...
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Not nitpicking.

I meant Medicare, not Medicaid. Medicaid is not used on all cases, there are some people who are covered under Medicare when they are under 65. I can't give you examples right now but think of more than kidney failures.

By the way the 8% that I am referring to has to do weith the problems with the different outlets here int he area. We have a divide between the papers and the radio and tv stations. Most of them have cut back staff, focused on more exciting news and left out things like the dog fighting problems we have or coruption in some level of government.
 
Top