danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
Offline
You they would solve 90% of the problem with voter turnout if nov 3 was a national holiday.....and make a law that employers have to let people go vote.
Vote by mail is to easy to cheat on unless you water mark or put some kind of hologram anti tampering.I think your sentiments are in the right place.
However, having said that, I don't think your number is accurate (90%) ... since it doesn't address the resources provided to polling locations, or the number of polling locations.
You can have a rural location with adequate staffing, voting equipment, etc. where it is a simple matter to walk in and vote and then walk out ... while at the same time have an urban location which is understaffed, lacks enough polling locations, equipment and so forth ... where people have very, very long waits to be able to vote.
The latter is by design ... and is intended ... because it makes certain populations less likely to vote.
One solution to that would be to make voting by mail - something which some states do - a lot easier ... but if having less people vote is one's goal, it wouldn't serve that purpose.
Vote by mail is to easy to cheat on
unless you water mark or put some kind of hologram anti tampering.
Heck let's add thumb print to the damn things too.Not necessarily.
Ok - water marks and holograms then and we should be good to go ?
Heck let's add thumb print to the damn things too.
Can you prove there was no voter mail in fraud.......
You have any further barriers you'd like to add ?
Apparently there was a bunch of (Democrat) ballot harvesting done in Georgia, which is illegal there. BustedCan you prove there was no voter mail in fraud.......
Apparently there was a bunch of (Democrat) ballot harvesting done in Georgia, which is illegal there. Busted
Well forensic audits seam to catch in-voter and mail in votes but Democrats sure seam to not want it done.....I notice you chose to ignore my previous question.
Just to clarify: it wasn't intended to be rhetorical.
Let me pose it again:
As far as your question goes, I could flip it and ask:
Can you prove there was no in-person voter fraud ?
That IS a rhetorical question - because we now know that there was (albeit fairly small) ... and apparently almost all from Republicans (likely Trump supporters)
The Trump team and Fox News alleged dead voters. Most cases were either debunked or actually involved Republicans.
The 2020 Voter Fraud Has Been Found And It Was Committed By Republicans
Since those initial reports even more have surfaced:
Florida The Villages residents accused of voter fraud in 2020 election after DeSantis pledges crackdown
Fourth resident of Florida Villages retirement community arrested on charges of voter fraud
While several of those individuals at The Villages list no party affiliation, it is known to be heavily Republican.
Shoot ... the GOP is even citing their own voters' fraud in court cases:
GOP attorneys flag Trump supporter’s arrest to bolster voter fraud claims
That's the sort of GOP'er Clown Show ya literally can't make up ...
![]()
That's a liberal talking point that has been proven not to be true. Overwhelmingly, the urban locations which are understaffed, lacks enough polling locations, equipment and so forth, are administered by Democrats, either within the Elections department, the Mayor and City Governments, or both.The latter is by design ... and is intended ... because it makes certain populations less likely to vote
“The General Assembly produced a plan that is infused with undue partisan bias and that is incomprehensibly more extremely biased than the 2011 plan that it replaced,”
"When the dealer stacks the deck in advance, the house usually wins,"
That's a liberal talking point that has been proven not to be true.
But Democrat ballot harvesting in Georgia is just peachy.
Yes, it is a liberal talking point, and yes it has proven to be not true. Finding the exception to the rule doesn't make the rule void. There are exceptions to everything, and this topic is no different. My statement was not one of absolutes, yet you treated it as such. "Overwhelmingly" does not mean 100% of the time in all instances everywhere forever and ever amen.So no - it isn't just "liberal talking point" (which itself is just a lazy way to address the issue) ... and that (so-called) "talking point" certainly hasn't been "proven not to be true".