Government aid could save U.S. newspapers

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
This is just getting completely assinine.......We might just as well nationalize the country now, because from here on out any business that is having financial issues will be going to the government for a BAILOUT, the gove will take stock and part ownership and more and more control of the market place.........

Government aid could save U.S. newspapers, spark debate

Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:50pm EST

By Robert MacMillan - Analysis

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Connecticut lawmaker Frank Nicastro sees saving the local newspaper as his duty. But others think he and his colleagues are setting a worrisome precedent for government involvement in the U.S. press.

Nicastro represents Connecticut's 79th assembly district, which includes Bristol, a city of about 61,000 people outside Hartford, the state capital. Its paper, The Bristol Press, may fold within days, along with The Herald in nearby New Britain.

That is because publisher Journal Register, in danger of being crushed under hundreds of millions of dollars of debt, says it cannot afford to keep them open anymore.

Nicastro and fellow legislators want the papers to survive, and petitioned the state government to do something about it. "The media is a vitally important part of America," he said, particularly local papers that cover news ignored by big papers and television and radio stations.

To some experts, that sounds like a bailout, a word that resurfaced this year after the U.S. government agreed to give hundreds of billions of dollars to the automobile and financial sectors.

Relying on government help raises ethical questions for the press, whose traditional role has been to operate free from government influence as it tries to hold politicians accountable to the people who elected them. Even some publishers desperate for help are wary of this route.

Providing government support can muddy that mission, said Paul Janensch, a journalism professor at Quinnipiac University in Connecticut, and a former reporter and editor.

"You can't expect a watchdog to bite the hand that feeds it," he said.

The state's Department of Economic and Community Development is offering tax breaks, training funds, financing opportunities and other incentives for publishers, but not cash.

"We're not saying 'Come to Bristol, come to New Britain, we'll give you a million dollars,'" Nicastro said.

The lifeline comes as U.S. newspaper publishers such as the New York Times, Tribune and McClatchy deal with falling advertising revenue, fleeing readers and tremendous debt.

Aggravating this extreme change is the world financial crisis. Publishers have slashed costs, often by firing thousands in a bid to remain healthy and to impress investors.

Any aid to papers could gladden financial stakeholders, said Mike Simonton, an analyst at Fitch Ratings.

"If governments are able to provide enough incentives to get some potential bidders off the sidelines, that could be a positive for newspaper valuations," he said.

NEWSPAPERS ARE DIFFERENT

Many media experts predict that 2009 will be the year that newspapers of all sizes will falter and die, a threat long predicted but rarely taken seriously until the credit crunch blossomed into a full-fledged financial meltdown.

Some papers no longer print daily, and some not at all.

Even as industries deemed too important to fail are seeking bailouts, most newspaper publishers have refused to give serious thought to the idea, though some industry insiders recounted joking about it with other newspaper executives.

"The whole idea of the First Amendment and separating media and giving them freedom of control from the government is sacrosanct," said Digby Solomon, publisher of Tribune Co's Daily Press in Newport News, Virginia.

Former Miami Herald Editor Tom Fiedler said that a democracy has an obligation to help preserve a free press.

"I truly believe that no democracy can remain healthy without an equally healthy press," said Fiedler, now dean of Boston University's College of Communication. "Thus it is in democracy's interest to support the press in the same sense that the human being doesn't hesitate to take medicine when his or her health is threatened."

Connecticut does not see trying to find a buyer and offering tax breaks as exerting influence on the press, said Joan McDonald, the economic development commissioner.

"It is what we do ... with companies whether it's in aerospace, biomedical devices, biotech or financial services," she said. "If a company is developing laser technology, we don't get into the business of what lasers are used for."

Connecticut's actions are not the first time government has helped newspapers. The U.S. Postal Service has offered discounted postage rates. Several cities have papers running under Joint Operating Agreements, created following the congressional Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 to keep competing urban dailies viable despite circulation declines.

But the press is not the same as other businesses, said veteran newspaper financial analyst John Morton. "You're doing something that has a bearing on political life," he said.

Marc Levy, executive editor of the Herald and the Press, said he would not let gratitude get in the way of reporting on local political peccadilloes.

"It's the brutal reality," he said. "You'd say, 'thank you very much for helping me with that, but now we have to ask you about this thing.'"

(Editing by Phil Berlowitz)
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
And the Beat goes on........ they will just continue to hand out taxpayer money and your kids grandkids will be paying for it. LOL, they even figure the Three will be back with their hand out askin for more, and they already know they will give i to them.........

Treasury Opens Door to Aid for Broad Array of Firms, Industries


By Rebecca Christie

Jan. 1 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Treasury threw the door open to taxpayer financing for a widening array of companies and industries by drafting broad guidelines on aid to the auto industry.

The Treasury’s guidelines, published yesterday, would let officials provide funds to any company they deem important to making or financing cars. That leaves room for the government to provide money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program beyond loans already committed to General Motors Corp., GMAC LLC and Chrysler LLC.
“There are going to be other industries that are going to have just as good a case,” as the auto companies, former St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President William Poole said in an interview on Bloomberg Television. “We don’t know what those other industries are going to be. Where does this process stop?”

Shares of auto suppliers including American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings Inc. and Lear Corp. jumped yesterday after Treasury announced the guidelines. The Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association has been lobbying for the use of federal funds as a backstop in case parts makers can’t collect money the auto manufacturers owe them.

Analysts have speculated that companies such as GM’s bankrupt former parts unit Delphi Corp., might be eligible for assistance. The Treasury guidelines may encourage more guessing on what companies and industries are next, said Vincent Reinhart, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.

‘Constructively Ambiguous’

Treasury officials “much prefer discretion, and so they would view the statement as being constructively ambiguous,” Reinhart said. “It’s appropriate that they end the year the way they spent most of it -- that is, adding uncertainty into an environment in which there’s a lot of uncertainty.”

The guidelines don’t bind the government, so the lack of specifics gives President-elect Barack Obama plenty of leeway to decide who succeeds and fails when he takes office in three weeks. The bailout was originally designed to buy assets from banks and has instead become a fund for Treasury to prop up lenders, insurers, carmakers, auto-finance companies and, now, any firm that may be important to those industries.

Slippery Slope

“The further you go, the slipperier the slope becomes, the more you open the door to anyone who says, ‘Look, my firm is in trouble, I need help too,’” said Lyle Gramley, a former Fed governor and now a Washington-based senior economic adviser for Stanford Group Co. “We don’t want to go any further down that road than we absolutely have to.”

The Treasury already has provided $6 billion in aid to GMAC, the financing arm of GM, and up to $17.4 billion in financing for GM and Chrysler, using funds from the $700 billion bank-rescue package.

“Treasury will determine the form, terms and conditions of any investment made pursuant to this program on a case-by-case basis,” the Treasury said in the new guidelines. “Treasury may consider, among other things, the importance of the institution to production by, or financing of, the American automotive industry.”

The government will weigh “whether a major disruption of the institution’s operations would likely have a materially adverse effect on employment and thereby produce negative spillover effects on economic performance” or on credit markets, the Treasury said.

Supplier Shares Leap

Shares of American Axle, GM’s largest supplier of axles, and Lear, the world’s second-largest maker of auto seats, both leapt in the minutes after the Treasury’s announcement yesterday. Detroit-based American Axle rose 56 cents, or 24 percent, to $2.89 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Southfield, Michigan-based Lear, which gets almost a third of its revenue from GM, rose 26 cents, or 23 percent, to $1.41.

This week’s funding agreement between the Treasury and GMAC opened a new rescue program for the auto industry as part of the TARP. Treasury said then that the GMAC agreement was “part of a broader program to assist the domestic automotive industry in becoming financially viable.” A Treasury official said there’s no cap or deadline for aid to the auto industry under the TARP.

“We would not be surprised to see additional government funds to GM to support a Delphi solution,” JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst Himanshu Patel said in a report Dec. 30.

With this week’s funding for GMAC, the Treasury has now earmarked $358.4 billion out of the $700 billion bailout. Its actual spending has been less -- for example, the department so far has handed out only $172.5 billion out of the $250 billion designated for bank capital injections.

Treasury Checkbook

When Congress approved the TARP in October, it gave the Bush administration the first of two $350 billion tranches. After injecting capital into GMAC on Dec. 29, the Treasury reiterated its call for legislators to release the rest of the money.

The auto-rescue program could range anywhere from full bailouts of specific companies to merely keeping others going while in bankruptcy to ensure production isn’t interrupted, said Kirk Ludtke, an analyst at CRT Capital Group Inc. in Stamford, Connecticut.

“The Detroit three are still at risk,” Ludtke said, referring to GM, Chrysler and Ford Motor Co. “The government is acknowledging it needs to assure at least an orderly restructuring of the key players in the auto industry.”

Bloomberg.com: Worldwide

To contact the reporters on this story: Rebecca Christie in Washington at [email protected];

Last Updated: January 1, 2009 00:00 EST

What fricken joke...........
 

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Every socialist country should have at least one state owned newspaper and television station.

I get the news I need on the weather report.
I can gather all the news I need on the weather report.
Hey, I've got nothing to do today but smile.
Paul Simon
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Yeap and still more come to the table for their BAILOUT, opps. loan..........

Any of you in need of a fed bailout? i mean chances are most will never be repaid to begin with, so you might just get a piece of the pie for little or nothing, if you play it out long enough, you know kind of like those "student loads" people take a then still the dept of edu on......


CNSNews.com

Commercial Real Estate Industry Asks Treasury for Govt. Bailout

Wednesday, December 24, 2008
By Josiah Ryan, Staff Writer

(CNSNews.com) - The commercial real estate industry could face massive bankruptcies in 2009 if it does not receive “urgent” loans from the federal government, according to a November letter sent to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson from the top commercial real estate trade organizations.

But an economist from the conservative Heritage Foundation told CNSNews.com that while the commercial real estate industry could face financial troubles in 2009, it is only one of many industries that is suffering from the recession and credit crunch. Also, many of commercial real estate’s problems are self inflicted, he said.

In the letter to Paulson, the top real estate organizations predicted that $400 billion in commercial mortgages will mature and require refinancing in 2009. A tight credit market, in which banks are wary to lend money, could prevent many owners from receiving refinancing, the letter said.

“Without swift federal action, borrowers will have no options for refinancing the $400 billion in commercial mortgages that are maturing over the next several months, and defaults will mount with severe consequences for investors, workers, local governments and the economy as a whole," Jeffrey D. DeBoer, president and CEO of the Real Estate Roundtable, warned in a statement accompanying the Nov. 26 letter.

Commercial mortgages are often designed to last only five to 10 years, and they sometimes expire with a final balloon payment, which is paid for through refinancing. If an owner is unable to pay off a mature loan, he may face bankruptcy.

In the letter to Paulson, the organizations requested that their industry be included in the Treasury Department’s $200 billion Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which was crafted as part of the financial bailout to provide liquidity, or cash flow, to small businesses and consumers.

According the Federal Reserve’s Web site, $20 billion of TALF money will come from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which grants the Treasury up to $700 billion to purchase troubled financial assets and financial instruments. The TARP was signed into law by President Bush in early October.

“Many steps are needed to address this issue, but the most significant and time-critical step would be for the Federal government, through combined action of the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve, to extend and enhance the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) announced on November 25, 2008, to highly rated (for example, AAA) commercial real estate mortgage-backed securities,” the letter says.

But David John, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, emphasized how the recession is hurting nearly all areas of the economy, not just commercial real estate.

“Every morning you can look in the newspaper and see another industry that is coming forward with revised profit estimates, additional layoffs, closing factories, or something like that,” said John. “The fact is that the federal government cannot single-handedly sustain the overall economy at its current level.”

Further, “it was very clear than many of these same problems we saw in other real estate transactions were going to appear in commercial transactions,” said John. “Underwriting standards were less than perfect and, as with housing, a number of projects had been started under the assumption the boom would continue.”

The organizations that signed the letter were the Real Estate Roundtable, the American Land Title Association, American Resort Development Association, Appraisal Institute, Building Owners and Managers Association, International Council of Shopping Centers, Mortgage Bankers Association, National Apartment Association, National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, National Association of Real, Estate Investment Managers, National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and the National Multi- Housing Council.
 
Top