Gasser Sprinter

dhalltoyo

Veteran Expediter
I believe starting in 2007 you could opt for a gasoline engine ?

I was just curious if anyone has purchased a Sprinter equipped with the gasoline engine?

If anyone has bought one, or is driving one, I would appreciate you taking the time to let us know how it performs.
 
Last edited:

dhalltoyo

Veteran Expediter
Thanks for the link.

The report was interesting.

Hopefully we will hear from someone who is driving a Sprinter with the gasoline engine.

PS. Does anyone know the origin of the 3.5L gas engine now available in the Sprinter?
 

Jack_Berry

Moderator Emeritus
just got off the phone with bob caldwell, well doug at bc anyway, gassers came up and he said they have one 140" std roof that on the computer got 12 in the city. his thought is maybe 15 hwy. subtract for the higher roof. did not think to ask about the origin of the engine.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
PS. Does anyone know the origin of the 3.5L gas engine now available in the Sprinter?

Yep, it is Mercedes, m 272 E35. I understand they don't expect to sell a lot of them but most mercedes dealers will be able to service them easier than the OM engines because they it is the same engine that they put into the SLK series among others. I would expect that there is a lot of after market stuff for it too.

I think there is a great AMG kit that replaces most of the engine innards to make your sprinter perform like a real Mercedes should.

by the way, AMG makes a tuning module for the 2.7 sprinter.
 
Last edited:

robh2

Veteran Expediter
I was told by a local dealer that the gasser was a Chrysler engine.

Anybody want to chime in on the origin of the motor?

Robert
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I was told by a local dealer that the gasser was a Chrysler engine.

Anybody want to chime in on the origin of the motor?

Robert

Actually that is sort of true, the engine is most definitely Mercedes, but it was a plan to put a gasser in the sprinter before the sale of the Chrysler division - so it is a Daimler - Chrysler engine. The crossfire is the same case, Mercedes engine in it.

But it is a Mercedes engine any which way you cut it.

There are two reasons they are putting this engine into the sprinter, one is they didn't want to retool the transmission housing because of the expense involved and the other is because of the sales to the companies who use NG for their fuel, they were going up against Ford and GM's NGV program, can't do that without a gas engine.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
From a 2009 review...

The SLK 350 carries what Mercedes says is a 3.5-liter V-6 engine that has undergone a major overhaul and now produces 300 hp (32 more than the previous version) and 265 lb.-ft. of torque.
08-MercedesBenz-SLK350-D03.jpg
However, Mercedes says the high-revving engine also provides better fuel economy and thus reduced CO2 emissions. It is linked to the 7G-tronic automatic transmission, which blips the throttle during downshifts for enhanced sound, performance and durability. Mercedes promises that the engine “strikes a far more emotive-sounding note.” Changes to the 3.5-liter engine include a higher rev limit, increased compression ratio, new intake manifold and what Mercedes calls “extensive” modifications to the valvetrain.

Additional history:

The 3.5-liter version of the 280SE was first introduced in 1970. It was similar to the base 280SE, but given a performanceboost thanks to the potent power-plant. It was hailed by the company as a smooth and powerful engine. Zero to sixty was accomplished in less than ten seconds.

Additionally for diesel owners:

Mercedes-Benz USA now approves the use of B5 bio diesel (standard diesel with a maximum 5% bio diesel content) in all Common Rail Injection Diesel "CDI-engines." As bio-diesel can be refined from a variety of raw materials resulting in widely varying properties, the only approved bio diesel content is one that meets ASTM D6751 specification and that has additionally the necessary oxidation stability (min. 6H, proved with EN14112 method) to prevent damages to the system from deposits and/or corrosion. Please ask your service station for further information. If the B5 bio diesel blend is not sufficiently labeled to clearly indicate that it meets the above standards, please do not use it. The Mercedes-Benz limited warranty does not cover damage caused by the use of fuels not meeting Mercedes-Benz approved fuel standards.
 
Last edited:

greg334

Veteran Expediter
OVM,

That's only a third of the story, you are leaving out their work with bio-fuels which makes our 'domestic two' look pathetic at best.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Who's work? Mercedes?

"domestic two"?

Exactly!

Mercedes has been working on the bio-fuel tech for a long time and they are producing improvements to both ends of bio-fuels (production to use) while at the same time our 'domestic two' have done nothing except promote a 15 year old technology as new - flex fuel. The hybrid thing is a failure to a point, there is now the question what advantages have we realized with Hybrids with our 'distance' highway speed society.

GM is even selling themselves as the company on the cutting edge of technology but produced nothing - i.e. the Volt technology and their claim as a leading manufacture of alternate powered vehicles.

I don't count Chrysler because they are using Mercedes technology and it seems that they are reorganizing their product line in the next few years so they may end up with a smart car/air powered car line in the future.
 

dcalien

Seasoned Expediter
Exactly!

Mercedes has been working on the bio-fuel tech for a long time and they are producing improvements to both ends of bio-fuels (production to use) while at the same time our 'domestic two' have done nothing except promote a 15 year old technology as new - flex fuel. The hybrid thing is a failure to a point, there is now the question what advantages have we realized with Hybrids with our 'distance' highway speed society.

GM is even selling themselves as the company on the cutting edge of technology but produced nothing - i.e. the Volt technology and their claim as a leading manufacture of alternate powered vehicles.

I don't count Chrysler because they are using Mercedes technology and it seems that they are reorganizing their product line in the next few years so they may end up with a smart car/air powered car line in the future.

I could save a lot on the air powered car if it runs on hot air.
 

Jack_Berry

Moderator Emeritus
greg334 said: GM is even selling themselves as the company on the cutting edge of technology but produced nothing - i.e. the Volt technology and their claim as a leading manufacture of alternate powered vehicles.

i think they are standing on their "we're green" platform. you can buy cars that run on e85, gasoline or hybrid, the active fuel management system that cuts out half the cylinders when cruising on the hwy. afteral in their own words the yukon hybrid get 21mpg city(not to mention that the 300 volt battery pack fits into the rear cargo area w/o compromising passenger room)(their words), better than the camry and accord v6. so that makes them cutting edge, i guess.
promote something without doing anything.
 
Top