It's racist because you've associated a black man with pimpin', which isn't done very often with a white man, and in order to make the racist connection you had to use the premise based on the lie that Obama wanted the helicopters in the first place. A more accurate heading would be Bush Wanted 28 New Marine 1 Helicopters Big Pimpin' In DC!! but that would just be stoopid, since the correlation with a white man from Texas and pimpin' around DC don't go together. Do I really have to explain this crap like this to you? Really? How is that racist? Really? Am I giving you far more credit than you deserve?
And you're right, he hasn't canceled them, he's placed them on hold. If the Secret Service, DOD and others are able to make the case for that many presidential helicopters (though, I can't imagine needing more than four), and he agrees with their assessment, then he may very well remove the order from its hold status. He may cancel it altogether, or he may reduce the number that are ordered.
Regardless, Barry doesn't want, Bush did, so why lie about something so basic, and then use that with the pimp connection? Why even mention the word "pimp" at all? It's got nothing whatsoever to do with the story. So if it's not racist, how do you explain using the term at all, and using it connected to the president who didn't even order them in the first place?
I still say it's lame. If you want to be racist, fine, we all are to one degree or another. I just wonder why you felt the need to interject it where it has no place, and in fact had to be fabricated to put it there. So my original question still stands... other than being racist, why would you do that?
