Backdoor Amnesty for Illegals...

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Got to get those illegals ok'd to vote....

"This appears to be part of the Obama Administration’s bigger plan to blow off Congress by using its executive powers to grant illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty."

DHS To Grant Illegal Aliens “Unlawful Presence Waivers”

April 02, 2012
The Judicial Watch Blog
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/04/dhs-to-grant-illegal-aliens-unlawful-presence-waivers/



In its quest to implement stealth amnesty, the Obama Administration is working behind the scenes to halt the deportation of certain illegal immigrants by granting them “unlawful presence waivers.”

The new measure would apply to illegal aliens who are relatives of American citizens. Here is how it would work, according to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announcement posted in today’s Federal Register, the daily journal of the U.S. government; the agency will grant “unlawful presence waivers” to illegal aliens who can prove they have a relative that’s a U.S. citizen.

Currently such aliens must return to their native country and request a waiver of inadmissibility in an existing overseas immigrant visa process. In other words, they must enter the U.S. legally as thousands of foreigners do on a yearly basis. Besides the obvious security issues, changing this would be like rewarding bad behavior in a child. It doesn’t make sense.

But the system often causes U.S. citizens to be separated for extended periods from their immediate relatives,” according to the DHS. The proposed changes, first announced in January, will significantly reduce the length of time U.S. citizens are separated from their loved ones while required to remain outside the United States during the current visa processing system.

The administration also claims that relaxing the rule will also “create efficiencies for both the U.S. government and most applicants.” How exactly is not listed in the Federal Register announcement, which gives the public 60 days to comment. That’s only a formality since the DHS has indicated that the change is pretty much a done deal.

This appears to be part of the Obama Administration’s bigger plan to blow off Congress by using its executive powers to grant illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty. The plan has been in the works for years and in 2010 Texas’s largest newspaper published an exposé about a then-secret DHS initiative that systematically cancelled pending deportations. The remarkable program stunned the legal profession and baffled immigration attorneys who said the government bounced their clients’ deportation even when expulsion was virtually guaranteed.

In late 2011 a mainstream newspaper obtained internal Homeland Security documents outlining “sweeping changes” in immigration enforcement that halt the deportation of illegal aliens with no criminal records. This also includes a nationwide “training program” to assure that enforcement agents and prosecuting attorneys don’t remove illegal immigrants who haven’t been convicted of crimes.

Judicial Watch has been a front runner in investigating the Obama Administration’s stealth amnesty program by pursuing DHS records concerning “deferred action” or “parole” to suspend removal proceedings against a particular group of individuals. Last spring JW sued DHS to obtain information because the agency ignored a federal public records request that dates back to July 2010.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Yeah, yeah, yeah I get it, they shouldn't be here in the first place. But guess what, they are and they aren't going anywhere. I thought the Republicans were all about the family?

I've heard some in here say, go back to your country and enter legally. Yeah well, when that can take months and or even year's, you think they're going to voluntarilly do this and be separated from their families or possibly never reunite? You do realize the estimation of those "illegal" immigrants that were brought her by their parents and had no choice in the matter is around a million?

It's about doing the right thing and not worrying about who they may or may not vote for. For God's sakes!

You might want to read about the story that's not so biased.

Obama plans change in immigration rule on waivers
By AMY TAXIN and LUIS ALONSO LUGO | Associated Press – Fri, Jan 6, 2012.

Link: Obama plans change in immigration rule on waivers - Yahoo! News

Let me point out a few of the highligts first: *emphasis mine

On Friday, the Obama administration proposed changing the rule to let children and spouses ask the government to decide on the waiver request before they head to their home country to seek a visa to return here legally.

The illegal immigrants would still have to go abroad to finish the visa process, but getting a provisional waiver approved in advance would reduce the time they are out of the country from months to days or weeks......

Immigrants who do not have criminal records and who have only violated immigration laws can win a waiver if they can prove their absence would cause an extreme hardship for their American spouse or parent.

Immigrant advocates have long complained about the current system, which can split up families for months or years. And since there's no guarantee a person will win a waiver to return, many immigrant families refuse to take the risk of going abroad to apply for one.


The full article:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration wants to more quickly reunite Americans with their illegal immigrant spouses and children in a move long sought by advocates but panned by Republicans as a way to push unpopular policies around Congress.

Currently, many illegal immigrants must leave the country before they can ask the federal government to waive a three- to 10-year ban on legally coming back to the U.S. The length of the ban depends on how long they have lived in the U.S. without permission.

On Friday, the Obama administration proposed changing the rule to let children and spouses ask the government to decide on the waiver request before they head to their home country to seek a visa to return here legally.

The illegal immigrants would still have to go abroad to finish the visa process, but getting a provisional waiver approved in advance would reduce the time they are out of the country from months to days or weeks, said Alejandro Mayorkas, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The purpose is "to minimize the extent to which bureaucratic delays separate Americans from their families for long periods of time," Mayorkas told reporters.

It currently takes about six months for the government to issue a waiver, Mayorkas said.

The waiver shift is the latest move by President Barack Obama to make changes to immigration policy without congressional action. Congressional Republicans repeatedly have criticized the administration for policy changes they describe as providing "backdoor amnesty" to illegal immigrants.

The proposal also comes as Obama gears up for a re-election contest in which the support of Hispanic voters could prove a determining factor in a number of states. The administration hopes to change the rule later this year after taking public comments.

Republican Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas on Friday accused the president of putting the interests of illegal immigrants ahead of those of Americans.

"It seems President Obama plays by his own rules to push unpopular policies on the American people," the House Judiciary Committee chair said in a statement.

Immigrants who do not have criminal records and who have only violated immigration laws can win a waiver if they can prove their absence would cause an extreme hardship for their American spouse or parent. The government received about 23,000 hardship applications in 2011 and more than 70 percent were approved.

About 75 percent of the applications were filed by Mexicans, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Immigrant advocates have long complained about the current system, which can split up families for months or years. And since there's no guarantee a person will win a waiver to return, many immigrant families refuse to take the risk of going abroad to apply for one.

Laura Barajas, a 42-year-old stay-at-home mom in Orange County, California, is due to travel to Ciudad Juarez in two weeks to try to get her papers. She and her U.S. citizen husband are trying to stay positive, but she is afraid to leave him and their two young children behind.

"I don't want to be separated for a long time from my children," said Barajas, who came to the U.S. illegally to find work, then met her future husband and stayed. "I'm not going to risk taking them to a place that I don't even know after 18 years."

Pro-immigration activists and lawyers embraced the change, saying it would keep families together and encourage more people now in the United States illegally to emerge from the shadows and apply for visas. Some said it could even save lives.

Democratic Rep. Jared Polis of Colorado recalled the case of Tania Nava Palacios, who went to Ciudad Juarez — a hotbed for drug-fueled violence — with her American husband and son in pursuit of a waiver. Drug cartel members killed her husband last year, his office said in a statement.

Kelly Alfaro, of Washington state, said her husband, Guillermo, waited in Mexico for eight months last year after he had his visa interview in Ciudad Juarez.

"I was terrified for his safety because I know how dangerous it is there and I had no way of knowing how long he would have to stay in Mexico," she said.

Democratic lawmakers welcomed the Obama administration's move to change the immigration system by rulemaking after efforts at a legislative overhaul failed.

"Has it taken a while? Yes. Is it happening? Yes," said Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois, who has encouraged such changes. "Am I looking forward to telling people to vote for him? Absolutely."

Immigration has become a difficult issue for Obama ahead of the November election. As a presidential candidate, he pledged to change what many consider to be a broken immigration system.

To that end, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced plans last year to review some 300,000 pending deportation cases in an effort to target criminal illegal immigrants, repeat immigration law violators and those who pose a national security or public safety threat.

Napolitano said the DHS would delay indefinitely the cases of many illegal immigrants who have no criminal record and those who have been arrested for only minor traffic violations or other misdemeanors. A pilot program is under way to begin reviewing the case.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton also issued a memo in June outlining how immigration authorities could use discretion in deciding which illegal immigrants to arrest and put into deportation proceedings.

Congressional Republicans have decried the policy changes, arguing that the Obama administration is circumventing Congress.

Several attempts at an immigration law overhaul have failed in recent years, including the so-called DREAM Act, which would have allowed for some young illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children to earn legal status if they went to college or joined the military.

___

Taxin reported from Santa Ana, California. Associated Press writers Elliot Spagat in San Diego and Alicia Caldwell in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Operation Wetback III. The first two worked great.

Here's how it goes down. Tell illegals they have 30 days to self-deport. After 30 days, if they're caught here, they're deported immediately. No ifs, ands, or buts, out of the country with nothing but the clothes on their backs and whatever's in their pockets. No going home to get wives or children; you had 30 days to do that and you chose not to. If you have unattended kids at home, tell us where so we can rescue them.

Look, when the economy is great and everybody who wants a job has one, we can afford to look the other way if Roberto and Lupe want to sneak in and pick our lettuce. That's not the case now. With the "official" unemployment rate at 8%+ and the real unemployment rate about twice that, and with illegals taking jobs that Americans DO want--yes, they do--we can't afford to look the other way right now.
--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.
 

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
Do the right thing? How about this? They sneak across the border, the women squirt out a litter of kids, And WE the Tax Payer, are being forced to support them! They take some of OUR social security that we the tax payer paid into and give it to them---Is that the right thing? They suck our welfare system that we the Tax Payer pay for, is that the right thing? How about this, They can take their litter of kids, their wives and or women back across the border (That way they will still be a family) and Do the Right thing the legal way! Now, That's the right thing!
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Criminal is criminal. Sorry. Feel bad for them all you want but they all need to go. We can't afford the world. We can't support the world. We need to enforce our laws whether they hurt feelings or not. That "do the right thing" is like Obama's "fair share". It's code for doing the totally wrong thing.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Don't be too hard on yourself. You still have time.
 

cableguymn

Seasoned Expediter
I see reading comprehension still isn't one of the strong suits here in the soapbox.


what, that YOU think it's ok to let them stay here and stuck the tit? That they won't leave? That it is ok for them to hold jobs while citizens can't get them?

If that is the way you feel, go sneak in to Mexico and see how they treat you.

Give up YOUR job and allow an illegal to take it.

I don't care how they got here. They are law breakers. Many of them are criminals BEFORE they got here. Mexico does not want them. Why should WE take them?

Yes. I am an *** about this. I don't give a flip. Maybe it's because I just cut uncle sam a check. maybe it's because I have unemployed family.. Regardless, kick um all out. They have a home country. They'll ram it in your face if you let them. Let them return to it.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
No need to complicate the simple. If they are here illegally, just shut off the endless government programs. People will become resourceful when the funds dry up. Oh...and before I forget, get rid of the sanctuary cities.
But.....I am ok with them here IF they serve four years in the military.
 
Last edited:

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
No need to complicate the simple. If they are here illegally, just shut off the endless government programs.

True. And stop applying the 14th amendment to them. It wasn't meant to be applied that way.

2012: Ron Paul or not at all.
The lesser of two evils is still evil.
 

cableguymn

Seasoned Expediter
No need to complicate the simple. If they are here illegally, just shut off the endless government programs. People will become resourceful when the funds dry up. Oh...and before I forget, get rid of the sanctuary cities.
But.....I am ok with them here IF they serve four years in the military.


I'll let them stay with 4 years in the military. however, no welfare for 15 years after the 4.
 
Top