Search results

I should've stated that she will not take any position that has anything to do with the Government or being a face of any party. She will not be a spokeswoman for any party, she will not be held responsible for any actions or words she says. She will be someone who just says idiotic statements...

You say Obama's Kool Aid, wouldn't it be Bush/Obama Kool Aid? Not only should you read the article before posting, you should be up on the history of the TARP.

I know layout, when you don't have a clue about something it can be strange indeed. I can explain if you wish.

As Greg and I were talking about in another thread, this job would fit her to a "T"! It is a job that is behind the seens, a job for someone who can raise money(which she is great at), a job that requires someone who is able to rally their base, and a job where they need a true Conservitive in...

Wait for it......Wait for it.......

Greg c'mon, every single solitary politician is selfish? I wouldn't go that far, more like 90% :). What cracks me up is when people call the President narcissistic and put a bad connotation to it. Anyone that has the balls to run for President would have to be narcissistic, what President...

If you are not careful Turtle, people are going to accuse you of having a bromance or man crush on me. :eek:

I would agree to a certain point. I think we have had time to get to know Palin as a person, candidate, pundit, reality show, Fox News contributor and her true colors are showing. Candidate or non-candidate, she in my opinion is selfish and only out for herself. I don't know if I would...

I have no idea what you think about Net Neutrality, that is why I posted the poll. How in God's name would listening to Beck have anything to do with me knowing what you think? Oh I get it. One or more of the choices is something that Beck has said Net Neutrality is in his opinion. I hope...

By posting poll questions that I have read or heard others saying about Net Neutrality? Why would that be playing games? I am curious to know what the Soapbox thinks it means. You just did. Thank you for participating.

I concur my friend.

I mean c'mon man, can you elaborate? Believe me, I agree with you when it comes to the news media. As Turtle would say, "You are preaching to the choir." I'm sure you could still tell us what your wounded vets opinions were of Couric without breaking any rules. Paraphrase if you will...

Sorry RLENT, I think I officially hijacked your thread.

If you had to choose between Palin or Paul, who would you vote for in the primaries?

That's sad. Thankfully, not everyone takes that approach when it comes to casting a vote. If they did, we might as well not hold elections, because you are NEVER going to get a candidate that you agree with on everything. To me that is the easy way out and let's you say, "Hey, don't blame me...

Again, you have to remember I am only pointing out deliberate lies or halve truths or hypocritcal rhetoric. I guess you could deduce from that, that the ones I have mentioned are doing it most often and worth mentioning. Feel free to do the same with the liberal media also. Like you said...

All you have to do is read her "tweets" to find out all you need to know. Just the fact that I said, "read her tweets", should stop any discussion of her being the President.

Who do you think has the international affairs experience you are looking for? Who would you like to see nominated for 2012, be it a Republican, Democrat, Independent, Tea Party or whatever party?

So you are essentially saying the press has made Palin look bad? She hasn't brought any of this upon herself? C'mon man. My question was, why do we not here Ron Paul's name more when talking about nominee's for 2012 and the only names I keep hearing are Palin, Gingrich, etc, etc. I do...

Well if we used Turtles logic, you would then be a part of the Assange fan club Greg. I know, I know, I am bringing something up from another thread, blah, blah, blah......