Search results

I don't think you could use gas as a comparison. That is a staple necessity for most to go to work and the like. I don't think a fast food place would fall in to that catagory. But from a competition standpoint, the cheapest station on the corner gets the business. If they raise the price for...

In this case it was one office that got caught. Might be worth a look at some others which I think is going to happen.

They certainly did. Kudos to Fox for staying on the story. After Fox spending a month on it, only now has the MSM started to report and question a lot of it.

I would agree. They "say" it was orchestrated from one office.:rolleyes: No.....I think it goes much deeper than that.

I couldn't say which is better? But I am tickled pink that I don't have any more.:cool: Better suited for a tractor trailer where you can leave the junk one and back under one that is working.

I think most have the option to do something other than Mickey's or welfare. Most if poor can attend college or a trade school for next to nothing. In fact, most can collect welfare and a whole list of benefits while they are students. Plenty do it with kids, but sadly, it isn't the majority...

Maybe there is something to those "death panels". :eek:

No not really. Moving the pay to 15 dollars won't change the quality. Don't have to look farther than the auto industry to see those results. Higher pay doesn't necessarily translate to "higher quality". I do agree though that supply and demand is what drives wages. McDonalds in San Francisco...

Basic supply and demand. If that Big Mac goes to ten bucks to cover the costs, no longer a need for the McDonalds. Those workers will go on welfare and instead of 15 per hour, they will demand 14 since they aren't working. It will be McDonald's fault and they will feel "entitled" to the 14 per...

The idiots and mentally ill have moved on. Apparently Wal-mart pressure cookers are all the rage now. Need to ban cooking devices. :rolleyes:

I just usually want to block "Rachael" from Card Holder Services. I ask for her picture when she calls daily and she hasn't sent one.:cool:

Turtle has precisely the right answer. And depending on what happens with immigration, those welfare numbers have a bunch more wanting to be added. We are even running commercials and billboards in Mexico to promote it. But back to my original point. There are no myths if you take out the...

abstinence? You can't say that. It isn't politically correct. That would mean refraining from something and that is not right. :rolleyes:

No real myth when you look at the numbers. Today you have more people than ever before on welfare. The average payout per person is the highest it has ever been. Many charts and links with some here on EO. And that isn't counting all the other benefits like free or subsidized housing, phones...

Is that like teaching global warming?;)

I do agree cultural changes have played in to it. As welfare and government programs expanded, it became "profitable" to increase the family size for many. I don't think we should ignore it either as the problem is currently here. Accountability for parents and the children involved will slow...

Not exactly. Today we want it to be someone else's problem other than our own. Shame can be a wonderful thing. Today some would glorify the Kardashians. I'm even ok with that, I just don't want to pay or be bothered for someone else's irresponsibility. Yet....some actually demand it.

Who is pretending? I didn't insinuate that either. Whether one has feelings or not doesn't translate into "they have to have sex regardless". Responsibility would be the key. Some will fail and when they do, they should be held accountable and accept the responsibilty for a pregnancy or STD...

Oh I don't know. I kinda lean towards the parental and personal responsibilty. While were passing out condoms and giving high fives, should we throw a fifth of whiskey in as well while they are driving around looking for a "spot"? If kids are going to have sex, you know they are going to drink.

Teacher should have been "teaching" and overseen the experiments. The teacher is responsible, not the student. As for the second, well....there are extremes on both sides. Indoctrination is much larger from liberals just based on demographics. Quite a few more public schools verses religious...