Search results

Yeah her and the person who wrote it for the TelePrompTer .

Your first sentence says 'I didn't note the possibility of an empty room'. I think you meant DID instead. If that is what you intended then I understand.

I thought you brought up the possibility of an empty room. I get your last point however. It can't be determined for certain.

See my previous post. Looks like Daniel Noe was correct after all .

Yes it was entirely possible that one could draw the conclusion that the room MIGHT HAVE BEEN EMPTY, however it was not the case. The Press Conference was from Oct 30th of last year. This is the whole press conference . The first clip is Gowdy. The second is the rest of it. Lengthy clip, but...

The floodgates are now open. Hehe.

Pilgrim, some can't let the inconvenient facts get in the way . They would rather rely on falsehoods. To borrow another sentence from a former poster. 'It fits the agenda'. Hehe.

Not really a fan of politicizing either,but don't believe some should 'throw the baby out with the bath water '. Meaning shutting down ALL investigations of anything because there is SOME political grandstanding going on . The FRUIT being the truth. Nothing more and nothing less.

A tired and overused line from some who don't want investigations to bare fruit, and provide real answers for the 'American people'. They can do both. It's enumerated for them to provide oversight. 'Securing' MANPADS, (among other things) and then 'unsecuring' them to Syrian rebels and into...

Looking at a few of these posts, it appears that some have real problem with this government oversight thing,regarding the Benghazi investigation. Borrowing a line from our resident roadrunner: 'Your gonna have to just suck it up buttercup and limp on down the road '. It ain't going away. Hehe.

I know you address this question to Ragman. Maybe he missed it. Your example is as you put it 'guilt is not in question'. I too posed the question about cases where there was no doubt. I believe I used the term '100 percent guilty'. I pretty much got a 'wow', a few snickers,(not candy bars )and...

Not exactly true. There have been cases in our history involving coerced guilty pleas, and voluntary guilty pleas where the person was innocent.

Oh, and a nice little article again from Seymour Hersh. A bit of a precursor to the Benghazi incident. Quite lengthy, but well worth the read. Seymour M. Hersh · The Red Line and the Rat Line: Erdo?an and the Syrian rebels · LRB 17 April 2014

Yeah, I knew the Allen West article might be a jagged pill to swallow for some. The 'god sent' sentence probably had some perked right up with frothing at the mouth. Here's another though from Seymour Hersh, that was referred to in the previous video . Seymour Hersh, less jagged of a pill, but...

An interesting (short) video hits on the first question by Gowdy and possible answers to it. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zDIzsHGZn0I

It was just Trey Gowdy and a few behind him, at a podium asking questions to the media. Wherever they may be.

Ok, I thought there were some in the room. I guess he was speaking to y'all reporters in the media universe.

We shall see with regards to 'questionable political judgements in executing national security or foreign policies'. Trey Gowdy appears to be on the trail for answers to that. Note his very first question to reporters in the video: Can you tell me WHY Ambassador Chris Stevens was in Benzhazi...

Busted ....

Rlent wrote: 'You're so focused and obsessed with slaking your own bloodlust and thirst for vengeance, that it appears that you can't conceive of the potential liability to the innocent' My statement : I see both sides of this.