Search results

Yes, the sentence can be undone,but hypotheticaly speaking, an innocent man would have spent 20 years in solitary confinement. What type of damage would that have done? I thought your major beef with the death penalty was that we couldnt be sure on 100 percent of the murder cases. You are still...

So using your argument, your ok with putting someone who may be innocent, in ultra max solitary confinement, for the rest of their life? By the way, whatever one feels about the death penalty, there are murders where there is NO DOUBT to ones guilt.

This might be a good idea . The private sector though, would have to lead the way on this. If You Need Any Convincing That Solar Roadways Are The Future, This Video Will Help

You got that right, Layout.http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UOY5OzdXU18

A better idea perhaps. GOP Rep. Proposes Health Care Vouchers So Vets Can Opt Out of VA | Washington Free Beacon

VA Gives Gitmo Terrorists Better Medical Care Than U.S. Veterans | Judicial Watch

Probably true .

Issa has been fair in his hearings.

Declining to testify however kind of goes against the whole transparency thing. You know, one of the themes they ran on, and claimed that they would be the most.

Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News: CNN footage shows Israeli troops firing rubber bullets, not live fire, in Beitunia

Yes, this is what I was referring to. A definite 'smoking gun' post #25.

I only addressed lambasting in regards to having him on ignore. Why don't you give me an example what you are talking about. The thread in question doesn't have any responses from Pilgrim to Rlent. Because he had him on ignore. For kicks and giggles, go and find it in the thread. It isn't there...

Cheri, Pilgrim responds to other members' posts. He shouldn't be lambasted for choosing to excercise the ignore button on one member. By the way, he had him on ignore. So he wasn't able to see his 'straight forward question'.

All you have are assumptions too. And you based all of your accusations of avoiding a specific question on an assumption .

Wow, to get an answer from someone that has been on ignore for years. The pure genius of that is scintillating.

Yes, I know Turtle was piggy backing your question and referencing him. Pilgrim however didn't know he was being referenced because he didn't see the original question.

I don't know if Pilgrim publicly stated from the beginning you were on ignore a long time ago. I just vaguely remember a post where he responded to something you had posted . The only reason was because your quote was in some else's reply . This was a few years ago. Which begs the question. At...

Regarding Turtle's post also asking about clarification about the Iraq war, and defending the constitution. If you look at his post, it is not directed toward Pilgrim to answer. (Ex:Pilgrims comment in a quote box)It is directed for ANYONE to answer. Having Rlent's on Ignore and the ORIGINAL...

Those are Pilgrim quotes that Rlent's has flagged. He is responding to Pilgrim only. If this is incorrect, someone could clarify, but I think Pilgrims quotes are responding to someone else.