Search results

Barkly? I'm not Barkly or Barkley. He is a former basketball player and a turrible,just turrible golfer.

Your flawed search engine investigation is quite humorous. Given that one is a President, and has been so for over 5 years. He also would naturally drive the news a BIT MORE than a former congressman (of many) from Florida. Not necessarily agree with your premise, that it is indicative of...

It's not whether they can divert attention, it's how EASY they can, from the 'contingent '. Hehe.

Yep ..., hook, line , and sinker.

I knew this would turn into a spell check thread. Pay me a million dollars to read words off a screen , and I'll proof read like white on rice.

I introduced the entire press conference because it was alluded to, perhaps not seriously, that no one was there. I posted the Allen West article for two reasons. One,was because it referred to some similar information I posted in the next article I posted. ( which still no one was interested...

Yes there is a difference between a genuine colossal dufus mistake and a deliberate decision to exact revenge. And there is this from article I posted: There's no doubt the Bush officials deliberately revealed Plame's CIA connection, if not her name, to the press. But the Plame leak could be...

Yes , I answered the question. You just don't like the answer . Nobody is required to give you an answer you want.

I'll ask you the same question. Do you know for certain that Gowdy didn't shame a whole room into silence? If so , how?

The entire event is not the question. The question is (as the title of the video says) did Gowdy shame a full room in to silence? Can you tell me for CERTAIN that this wasn't the case? Yes or no?

The title of the video referred to Gowdy's talk and the questions he asked.

If you would have read the post like #75. which I answered, you wouldnt have to take numbers and wait in line for answers.:D

But I did answer your question. Post #75 ' I got your last point(referencing third sentence)however, it can't be determined for certain'. Not seeing the journalists(that were there) and interviewing them, it can't be determined for certain. It's entirely possible that that might have been and...

First sentenced rewrote: 'It is also entirely possible, quite likely, in fact, that I mentioned the possibility of an empty room, not because of a conclusion drawn or because I believed that was the case." Your second sentence begins with: "It a brought up..... The typo added to confusion. I...

Ok this is what I thought you meant, reworded . Your original sentence wasn't worded correctly.

Obama Excuse Team or Obama Apologist Team Saviors. (O.A.T.S.) works for me. They be eating them oats. Hehe.

Disagree with your premise. It appears some instead want to divert attention away from important issues, by instead pointing to shiny objects over there like possible empty press conferences,(that aren't ) derangement attitudes towards Allen West, and who Roger Ailes hires.;)

Instead of posting this in the Gowdy thread, and diverting from that topic, I started a new one. When Bushies blew a CIA cover, it was 'treason'; now, it's a mistake | WashingtonExaminer.com

Ok, if that's your story. If anchors don't want obvious mistakes like that to happen, they should look over it better. It was a short read. Even a speed read should have caught it. Maybe they would be taken more seriously if they stopped just reading the TelePrompTer and catched obvious...

I knew the West article would draw the usual reaction from some, but how about the Pierce Nahigyan article quoting Seymour Hersh and the one by Hersh himself? Did you take those with honey too? Are they part of the circus too? Shriners would like to know? Hehe