Search results

.... really ? "Television ratings show that the program generally has 1.45 to 1.6 million viewers nightly, a high figure for cable television. In demographic terms, the viewership is skewed to a relatively young audience compared to traditional news shows. A 2004 Nielsen Media Research study...

Absolutely correct ..... and I didn't mean to trivialize it by my response.

OVM, read what I wrote very carefully - because I meant exactly what I said ..... I didn't say anything about mere thoughts ..... or having an opinion ... What I said was "seeking to stop it" That would mean something along the lines of the following: prohibit, prevent, obstruct, deny...

On the older 5 cylinder Sprinters it's 4200 rpm ... this ain't yer daddy's diesel .... :eek:

That's just about as retarded as those who are seeking to stop it .... almost ......

One would always do well to understand exactly who (or what) one is agreeing with ....

Oh, I'll bet ...... :rolleyes: Absolutely correct (but it wasn't Obama's administration that actually was the one that decided to spend the money - it was Congress) Well ..... it would be ..... if that were the reason that someone said he was "reckless and irresponsible and not to be trusted"...

..... try to .... try to make him look bad .... Ultimately, what they actually end doing is making themselves look like the bigots and fools that they truly are ..... Precisely ....... ;) Rarely ever watch Olberman myself ... don't much care for the guy, or some of his politics ...

Now that's pretty funny ...... Consider the difference: Two different people read a post which is clearly incomprehensible. One person can't make heads or tails of it (and knows it) The other party believes they know and understand what was being said .... :rolleyes:

From Sadly, No: Uhhhh .... yeah ...... okey-dokey ..... :rolleyes: Well, it's some pretty funny stuff anyways (you ought see how old James gets to the above conclusion) ..... and worth a read - just for more examples of the sheer lunacy extant in the blogosphere, if nothing else: New Wingnut...

Spot on Amonger - thanks for posting it.

Well I dunno there DD .... seems to me she bugged out on this thread (twice ?) ..... and you're still here ... :D

........ Paul Harvey anyone ? :rolleyes:

One might think that as a detective, you had been previously involved with investigating things, discovering facts, and ascertaining the actual truth of certain matters .... and then reporting that to others ..... If you had done the above for any length of time, it might have become almost...

Now I could be wrong on this (the old memory ain't as good as it used to be) ..... it wouldn't be the first time ... and probably wouldn't be the last ...... but the real irony here on this one: ...... now wait for it ....... ...... former detective ......

Would work just fine for me ...... Although Davis argued as a Senator against secession prior to the fact of it, he agreed (with others) that each state was sovereign and had an unquestionable right to secede from the Union. I believe he was right in the matter, from a moral and ethical...

WHAT ? You mean that this wasn't entirely created by Obama hiz bad self ? (.... in full, direct collusion with Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and various elements of the Tailban, of course) Now hold on here ...... wait just a cotton-pickin' minute .... 2001 ...... ? Hmmmm ..... who...

Judging from most of the commentary in here, I have to believe that: A. either most folks didn't actually hear what he had to say, preferring to rely instead on biased (and/or inaccurate) news coverage, or B. in hearing exactly what he said, they were incapable of actually receiving...

Clearly, that was your first mistake ......

I can't imagine anything much more arrogant (or as narcissistic) and as utterly hypocritical ... than proclaiming one is "all for" religious freedom ..... and before the breathe is even finished leaving the lips, to qualify it by saying "UNLESS it means building a certain building in a...