Search results

And some people are so ignorant and stupid that they are completely unable to make a legally-sound and persuasive argument to convince anyone other than a roomful of 6th grade-educated drunken Bubbas at the local redneck bar .... who are probably all first cousins ..... and related by marriage...

Well, if you get tired and bored while trying to dig up something (that you hopefully won't mischaracterize as something it's not :rolleyes:) and wanna take a break, chew on this while you are resting: Like to original story: Ron Paul Makes an Appeal for Third-Party Candidates IIRC...

Your statement is factually incorrect as far as I know ..... where are you getting this from ? :confused:

The relevant portions of the actual law (TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part III > § 1481) can be viewed at the following link: § 1481. LOSS OF NATIONALITY BY NATIVE-BORN OR NATURALIZED CITIZEN; VOLUNTARY ACTION; BURDEN OF PROOF; PRESUMPTIONS From that link:

Greg said: And then Boobala - who apparently considers "www.wisegeek.com" as the truly definitive source for all things in matters of Constitutional Law opines: Well, actually Greg is a precisely, spot-on correct - but I'm not expecting you to "get it" .... particularly given your inclination...

Breaking the law: Anwar al-Awlaki's extrajudicial murder

The due-process-free assassination of U.S. citizens is now reality

Well there ya go - your comments above are quite telling indeed. Understandable I guess ..... for someone who wants to be "protected" and "cared for" by their Uncle .... Just so everyone is clear here - since apparently you have a misunderstanding - the President does not swear to protect the...

Sorry .... but that's a mighty short-sighted and rather myopic view you have there my friend. Consider the various precedents that have now been set: It is no longer necessary apparently for the government to build a case, prosecute it successfully by presenting evidence and/or testimony, and...

Precisely why any persons of similar nature, temperament, and intelligence should never, ever be allowed in a position to make such decisions. You are apparently talking about an "pre-emptive", unprovoked attack on military assets of a sovereign nation, legally operating in International...

Think about it:

That there jus' makes ya really proud to be an Amurycun, don't it ? :rolleyes:

Heheheh .... Hope for this one you're not really expecting a responsive reply, one given in all candor ..... :rolleyes: Using similar "logic" as the poster you are questioning, we get the following: ...... everyone that voted for H. W. Bush elected Clinton .... It really does work both ways...

..... simply ..... ground-breaking ..... :rolleyes: I'll bet most folks probably don't even realize the unique significance of this event. This is the first U.S. citizen publicly approved for extra-judicial assassination, and then subsequently deprived of life - without the benefit of a trial...

MB is not that much older than me ;) ........ close enough to be my peer, rather than my elder :D

..... well ..... maybe not ..... totally unfounded ....: Bachmann Is a Lunatic which refers to: Bachmann warns of Hezbollah ‘missile sites’ in Cuba .... whackadoodle .... :rolleyes:

Earlier article from the NYT on the matter: Antiaircraft Missiles on the Loose in Libya I note the following in it: "During more than four decades in power, Colonel Qaddafi’s often bellicose government is thought to have acquired as many as 20,000 of these missiles, known as Manpads, for...

The two points/statements in my post that you are replying to are inextricably linked. You separated them - and treated them as though they were separate and unrelated. This would seem to indicate that you are possibly in a state of non-comprehension as to the intent of my communication...

Bubbie, I know that you know what you mean or intend when you write something ... however, in order to have a two-way communication, it is necessary for you to take some care and structure your written postings so that others too may decipher them. When you intermingle your written...

It's not that I "can't" dispute them ..... it's just that isn't anything there to dispute .... At the point where you can actually structure a cogent and reasoned argument in a lucid fashion, using facts you quote in a logical manner to make a point, I might be willing to take a shot at it...