Search results

YouTube audio clip: Michael Savage: Ron Paul is 100% Right On Al-Awlaki Assassination Impeachment anyone ?

Nice try ...... but ..... And you apparently are going to treat us to more of the "missingness" as far as: what he was actually doing .... the "saying" thing is largely in the public record, save for anything he said in private. Speaking of what's missing as far as exactly what he did...

Yeah .... You know the words .... but you can't actually sing the tune .... You can play the individual notes on your instrument .... but ya can't play the music ..... There is a huge difference between just mouthing some words ... and actually doing what is required to support and defend ....

You're apparently confused - and incorrect: There was one US citizen killed (Samir Khan) and an individual who held dual US-Yemeni citizenship, who was the actual target (Anwar al-Awlaki) But great impression of a US government mouthpiece ....

Andy Bittenbinder - aka "Doktor A" 412-366-6165 Doing great AFAIK - been a while since I've talked to him tho' ...

Wisdom for the ages: "Men naturally rebel against the injustice of which they are victims. Thus, when plunder is organized by law for the profit of those who make the law, all the plundered classes try somehow to enter -- by peaceful or revolutionary means -- into the making of laws. According...

The video is interesting - if only from the perspective that it shows the degree of disdain, disgust, and contempt that HWJ has regarding speaking with a bunch of shallow and banal corporate media twits .... and that's toward ones which (arguably) might be more politically close to him than most...

Bubbie, Seriously ? You - of all people - are gonna act as "spokesperson" on this one ? Put down the shovel, climb out of the hole, and just walk away ..... No. (That's not to say that you don't disagree - you clearly do .... but it's not "just" that that is the problem here.....) Wrong -...

..... huh ? ...... um ...... EEK ! :eek:

L, Whew .... thanks for the clarification ..... I was afraid it was something far more sinister ...... :rolleyes: Now that that is cleared up, please excuse me ..... while I go check on that black helicopter that seems to be circling the house for some inexplicable reason .... ;)

I'm often here (not always daily) .... even if only just reading ..... and I haven't gotten the first one ... :D What do you suppose that means ? :eek: :rolleyes:

Not that Herman is all groovy (he believes spying on Americans is okey-dokey, and thinks the Fed doesn't need audited), but props where props are due: Link to original article: Herman Cain: Spying on Americans Is Okay, But Not Assassinating Them

This is the point where one knows that one party has thrown in the towel and is preparing to leave the field of battle ..... as a consequence of being utterly unable to address the argument from the other side in a responsive, substantive, and legally-sound manner .... Out of ammo ? Tactic of...

Sorry but that was a FALSE REPORT (by your trustworthy government) - the bombmaker was NOT killed in the strike.

Dennis, Could you clarify the "it just ain't so" portion - you agree that it was unconstitutional ....... and that they acted illegally ? But .... it just ain't so ? That statement seems to be inherently and internally inconsistent ... :confused: Factually untrue (the highlighted portion...

Do you even understand what the words in the above context mean ? What it means is: that people in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service [of the land or naval forces, or the Militia] may be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, without a...

LOL .... Ahhh .... not really ... the Constitution is always the most supreme law of the land - simply by virtue of the fact that the authority for any and all subsequent federal law is contained within it, and proceeds from it - and no federal, state or local law may legitimately violate or...

Well, okey-dokey ..... thanks for the historical context .... and to others for their little sentimental stroll down memory lane, recounting the "good ol' days" .... :rolleyes: Hopefully, you - and anyone else, citing a military oath - are not trying to take the position that it justifies any...

Well Bubbie, How's about it ? Can you .... or, for that matter, any of the other little chest-thumpers in here .... answer my question in a responsive manner ? Which is senior and controlling - the AUMF .... or the Constitution ? Can Congress legitimately pass laws which are in direct...

Before babbling on in here with the same incorrect and legally-misinformed drivel in this thread, perhaps you might wish to read my reply to you in the other thread where you posted it, and answer the single, simple question that I asked you there. Dr. Paul actually understands the law .... and...