Sometimes you have to read this stuff and just sit back and laugh, if you like good irony and can appreciate the special hypocrisy that only a red-blooded, True American Conservative can muster. If you are one of these conservatives, and you know who you are, you can only sit back and wince...
So, am I supposed to stick my tongue back out at you now? Because I could say the same thing about your comments.
I know from where my conclusions were drawn. I know that because I'm the one who drew them. I began a statement with, "From accounts thus far," then proceeded to lay out a rough...
My entire statement was based on those accounts. So it shouldn't be all that shocking that I would be focusing on, you know, the accounts. Why your comments reference something outside of those accounts, and thus outside of my statements, I can only guess.
Well, duh! That's why my comments were...
For the first time since the fourth Super Bowl, no Roman numerals will be affixed to the 50th Super Bowl. Instead of Super Bowl L, it will be Super Bowl 50, using the Arabic numerals.
Clearly, the NFL is a Muslim organization run under sharia law.
Shipping costs have doubled (Pella Window) and even tripled (Briggs & Stratton) in some cases over just the last 6 years. These are the only two where I have reliable information, but they are very disparate industries and might indicate a trend. In both of the above cases, though, I know that...
Then you don't know what assume means.
Assume means to take something for granted or without proof (as being true or false). I make no such assumption as to the truth of the accounts, I merely draw conclusions based solely on those accounts. I make no assumptions that there exists any...
No, it doesn't. What part of "From accounts thus far," are you having difficulty with?
I'm not sure if that sentence even makes any sense. Seems to be a missing word on conjunction or something. But you are correct in that there could not be any circumstances where what he did was valid based on...
Possibly, but not likely.
It doesn't assume anything, it is based on "from [the] accounts thus far."
That's not a fact, it's a supposition.
That much is certain.
According to members of his platoon, he did not abandon a guard post. He finished his turn on guard and was relieved, and sometime during the night after that he was missing.
From accounts thus far, it appears that he did not have a sudden epiphany of conscience, morals or ethics (if he had...
Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas
The numbers vary from year to year, but stays within a range of generally 8-10 percent. What numbers, you might ask? It's the number of police officers killed with their own or another officer's department-issued firearm by someone who took the gun away...
You keep asking that same question over and over, because no one is answering. The reason no one is answering it is because it's a silly question with a false premise. They don't ONLY restrict the rights and freedoms of law abiding citizens - they restrict the rights and freedoms of criminals...
Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas
If eating chimichangas at Chili's while wearing rifles on your shoulders saves the life of just .one . child. then it will all be worth it..
Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas
The people who want all guns banned and destroyed agree with you, one hundred percent.
See, the thing is, I believe "shall not be infringed" can only be interpreted one way. I also believe going all "gun nut" over that one, simple fact is counter...
Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas
Take the number of restaurants there are, times the number of days in a year they are open, and divide that into the the number of incidents where it was beneficial to have someone carrying in the restaurant. It's a really, really small percentage, not...