Search results

I've seen mention of "several months" ... "A federal law enforcement official told USA TODAY that the investigation, which began months ago, is largely complete and that a decision on possible charges would be up to prosecutors." But several or four is largely irrelevant ... until one knows...

Notice how he avoided answering your question (which was not rhetorical) Also notice how he failed to address your refutation of his previous assertion above Looks like 0 and 2 to me ... Yup - pretty much.

That's a crack-up ... since it immediately starts off with a misrepresentation of the truth (OMITTED DATA) - the Whitehouse wasn't "watching in real-time as the situation unfolded" ... There was no live video feed at the start of the attack - there may have been a live audio feed though...

How - by offering Petraeus his own personal staff fluffer ? If King David don't wanna hang, he don't wanna hang ...

Who says Obama forced him to resign at all ? Where is the evidence to support that premise ?

I'll say ... I'm getting close to the age where that may be a problem myself. Just enough to be dangerous. Then why are you wasting time on here peddling goofy stories from FrontPage Mag instead of working on fixing it ?

A jack plate may well be required ... but it ain't the boat that needs it.

Rep. Eric Cantor, much like Rep. Peter King, is a wretched little turd: FBI agent's call didn't affect Petraeus-Broadwell probe, official tells NBC News

Actually, I don't reject everything you say - in fact, there are many things (but not all) that I agree with you on, philosophically.

What reason you were using "it" for is immaterial - I'm rejecting the premise (that he was blackmailed) ... since there is no evidence to support it. Of course, that's a lot different than saying he couldn't have been blackmailed. IOW: You assert something as a fact - something for which you...

Uh-huh ... right.

Seems to me that the way blackmail usually works, is that one doesn't publicly reveal the dirt one has on the blackmailee (thereby preserving the threat of public disclosure and all that would ensure from it), in order to force them to do something you want ... Dunno ... maybe you are talking...

Don't bet on it - the truth often has a way of making itself known eventually. BTW, would you support the same standard (essentially a cover-up and no humiliation) ... if we were talking Obama rather than the General ?

No, but we certainly are being entertained ...

Ahem ...

Like ol' P.T. Barnum said: There's one born every minute ...

That you would cite this article is actually pretty scary, in light of your claimed professional background ... but not entirely surprising, given your propensity to histrionics. Anything off FrontPage ought to be considered dubious at best, until shown to be otherwise. The article is...

Yes - your assertion that the FBI investigated him for four months does appear to be laughable ... Petraeus was not the initial focus of the investigation, and his name and the affair only came up as a peripheral issue, in the course of an investigation into something else, after they...

If you are so inclined and are somewhat industrious, you can probably find out what may have played into Carter Ham's decision to retire - the possible reasons are "open source" and in the "public domain". And IIRC, they predate Benghazi by a significant amount of time - which would seem to...

No, not even close ... in fact, if one looks in the piece you cited just previous to my post, one finds more of the exact same sort of overblown dramatics and stupidity ... provided, of course, that one is intelligent enough to see it where it actually exists.