Search results

Yeah ... there couldn't possibly be any other reason that Petraeus ended it ... :rolleyes: Do you notice the difference between my phrasing and your's - regarding who ended it ? Think about that for a little bit ... and in the meantime I'll tell you a little story: When my youngest son - who...

The following article, which came out yesterday evening, speaks to the issue I referred to earlier, in regards to King David: Petraeus Fell for the Wrong Reason

He sat down opposite the treasury, and watched the crowd putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. A poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny. Then he called his disciples and said to them, "Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in...

Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.

Then the king will say to those at his right hand, "Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was...

Or it could be that the "Answer" (that never was) will eventually turn out to be an urban legend ... sorta like that whole "giving LSD/acid to kindergartners" thing ...

That's true ... although it begs the question of how someone - particularly someone here - would have actual knowledge of the matter unless it had been reported, short of direct personal involvement in the matter themselves ... BTW - you read any good Obama stories on FrontPageMag lately that...

Thank you for providing a clear example of exactly what I was referring to in my last post. The fact of the matter is that if one examines the timeline that you offered one can easily see that it does not say Petraeus knew he was under investigation in July or August. IOW, you can't get there...

Who knew of his affair ? And when did they know ? What is the source of that information ? When one has a fertile imagination - and deals with primarily in fantasy and self-delusion - understanding of relevant facts and reality are never required ... Some people make it a point to "figure...

Really ? At what point/date - specifically - did he become aware that he was under investigation ? I'm assuming that you actually know something here ... and aren't just talking out of your *** once again ... Of course, that may be a very big assumption ... :rolleyes: BTW - where was this...

Not even close ... Oh you would, would you ? ... LOL ... There is nothing wrong with legitimate scrutiny ... there is everything wrong with overblown "scrutiny" done solely for partisan political reasons. Dave you need to relax ... calm down a little ... take a chill pill ... The above...

JJ, I have plenty of adjectives to heap on Petraeus, regardless of him bolstering my narrative or not ... and they would not be kind words at all - but that's an entirely different conversation. That has to do with Petraeus' culpability in overseeing the training of Iraqi security forces (and...

Nothing more there than speculation by the ignorant and uninformed ... I can understand why you like it though ... given that they are like you: largely ignorant and uninformed ... ;)

Probably not as well as it might have had the morons in the Party of Stupid not elected to try and make political hay out of the matter solely for partisan gain ... Because he - unlike you apparently - actually understands the actual sequential process that they go through to be circulated...

Actually, my analysis is based on my observations and my own interactions with a variety actors on the political stage and behind the scenes, both in and out of the GOP, but largely in the conservative realm - from the local to the national level. It may not be entirely true of the rank and...

Appears you haven't gotten the memo - what was going on in Benghazi was largely a CIA operation, being run - at least to some extent - under diplomatic cover ... That fact is confirmed by the relative distribution of the personnel between the two agencies - something the order of 6 or so from...

To what are you referring ? Specific examples ? Can you explain your above statement and how it is so - by providing the specific context to which you are referring ? Well, there has been a lot going on ... LOL ... Personally, I'm more inclined to have the folks involved in providing those...

More details - including repeated confirmation that former terrorist fund-raiser and New York Rep. Peter King has memory difficulties, and is also incorrect (or just lying) about who took out the reference to A-Q: Petraeus to Congress: CIA believed early on that terrorists were behind Libya...

Expect the relative importances and focus to now change from "The American People Were Mislead and Lied To ..." to "It Really Is Just A Matter Of A Security Failure And Always Was ..." for the Party of Mental Retardation ... Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community...

Dave, In case you missed the memo: correlation does not necessarily equal causation ...