Search results

That's b because, again, we have another example of you not understanding what you read. I didn't buy into that narrative. I said it happens often enough that it's something that should not be dismissed as irrelevant or non-existent. You, on the other hand, take the posit that it happens so...

Trying really, really hard at explaining things away to put the police in the best light, to somehow prove no racial bias. It's hilarious that you can't see what you're doing when you do it.

The Code of Conduct covers pretty well the posting of personal information.

I have no idea if that particular cop is racist, but he did shoot an unarmed black man in the back and then lied about what happened, he was officially reprimanded twice for unprofessional conduct during traffic stops, and is currently being sued along with the city for civil rights violations...

You're on a roll. You should book a weekend at the Comedy Club. Everything you post about this subject looks for the best possible interpretation of the statistics to show that the police are not racist or do not engage in selective policing, because you don't believe a racial disparity in...

There is no evidence, or even a hint, that an off-camera encounter took place, not even in the police officer's fictional report. The only reason to bring up such a possibility is to place the officer in a better light, to offer up some pipe dream of an excuse as to why the officer felt...

Yeah, mainly because it's an incident universally condemned by everyone and you really don't have a choice, but your comments also included the possibility that there was an encounter that we didn't see on the dash cam or the phone video that could explain the officer's actions, and tried to...

That's funny right there. Everything you post about it makes the effort to put the police and law enforcement in the best possible light.

You know about this, right?

Dispatched or not, dead or not, "I'll be here until [I go somewhere else]" is a little bit obvious, isn't it? I'm going to bed now, and I'm going to stay there until, well, until I get out of it.

Did you just say that?

Teanna members can certainly pick and choose who they want to do business with.

Oh I think it is lost on you, because you aren't very often interested in the unbiased truth at all, you're far more interested in biased news and opinion that agrees with your own opinion.

Your agree with the Blogger. I get it. And no I won't forget about what I think about Vdare, because you aren't even making an attempt to seek out independent, unbiased reporting on it. No I don't dispute any of the statistics you posted. One, because I didn't try to verify them, and two...

Harvey is great!

That's the Detroiter

The insurance crooks are really more in other types of insurance, like health and homeowner, where they aggressively look for ways to avoid paying a claim, and when they do pay they either raise your premium or just cancel your insurance.

Like I said, you're trying really, really hard. And seeking out other people's blatantly biased interpretations of the report is a strong indicator of that. Or, do you really believe Vdare is an unbiased news source? For some reason you believe the allegations of racism in the Ferguson Police...

See? You're working freaky, really hard to exonerate the cops, to give them every possible benefit of the doubt in every situation. The interviews they did weren't to go out and collect allegations they were to confirm or refute the things they found in the police documentation. They found...

I'm sure that's what you believe, but there's no evidence that the DOJ went to Ferguson with a mindset that officers were discriminating. And they used far more than a few texts and a desire for more revenue as proof of anything. The looked at the data, including the Ferguson Police's own...