Search results

Every time government gets involved in things, at any level, it is divisive. That is why most government functions were limited to the States and the People. The larger the level of government the more divisive and damaging the action is, because it affects far more people. A "state religion"...

None of them.

I like it. Well written and spot on.

"And if it's 'divisive' for the Feds to pick a religion, it would be every bit as much for the states to do it." Nope, it's called "States Right's". The People, within a state, have the right, if they so chose, to have a "state religion". It would not have the same affect as a "National...

That is the result for hot dogging it in bad weather.

Don't mallards. IF you were blessed to get some of my blood you would know what it is like to be WAY TOO COOL!! :cool:

At least the ABA would PROVIDE jobs rather than getting rid of them! :p

And the entire world is deep in debt and going deeper in debt with each passing minute. The rich keep getting richer and the poor, worse off. It is working as it is wanted to work. Suppress the majority and reserve the wealth for the elite ruling class. And the "sheeple" continue to fall for it.

ALL subsidies are bad, corporate or personal. Stand on your own merit or fail. Subsidizing failure leads to failure. Taxing success leads to failure. Redistribution of wealth leads ONLY to a small, very wealthy, elite ruling class and a suppressed general population.

The site was built on low bid, and likely a LOT of kick backs, the program was written by elitist control freaks who ONLY want control of you and your money. One would have to be daft to believe that ANYONE in Washington, regardless of party, gives a flip about your health or welfare.

Part of the problem with the website is the volume, they did not build it big enough to do what they wanted it to do. The website is not the primary problem anyway, the program itself is. It was broken from the start, be design, and cannot be fixed. The NEXT step is the "market place did not...

It is AMAZING just how many are willing to accept Marxism. Oh how weak they are.

An OUT RIGHT LIE is the same, and as acceptable, as a CHESS MOVE? WOW! Why would people "freak out" if it were good? WHY, if it is GOOD, does it HAVE to be FORCED? IF it were good, people would FLOCK to it of their own accord. As to MY beliefs about it? I gave up ALL chances of retiring, to...

Is a government FORCED, redistribution of wealth, pure Marxism, plan good? Is that freedom? Is that liberty? Compassion for my situation? Where? I don't NEED compassion, I need, honest, solid, affordable, solutions. I need what we had, or better, at the same price, or less. NOTHING else...

What should we tell the 100 MILLION that could lose there plans in 2015? That it's good for them too? 100 Million More Could Lose Insurance Under Obamacare OH WAIT! Forbes says it will ONLY be 93 MILLION, I guess THAT's OK...

What difference does it make in '16: "Clowns to the left of me, Jokers on the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you"!!!

SO, it's OK to LIE to the American People and stick it their ear because it MAY be better for some? Would it not be better to be honest from the start and SAY that UNLESS you buy what you are TOLD to buy, whether you like or not, at a price that is what you are TOLD you are going to pay, you...

Good thing I am behaving myself. :cool:

I find it interesting how many are fixated on the failure of the web site and pay little if any attention to the millions who are losing coverage, to the high cost, low coverage plans they "claim" are better than what many had and the loss of choice and freedoms Obama Care is responsible for.

*SIGH* I wish I had the time. :( Can't afford to enjoy all my sins. I have to pay for the ones I do indulge in.