Search results

Why would you be very skeptical of Michelin's best selling light truck tire? They upgraded their previously best selling M/S2 tires with the improved Defender "EverTread" rubber compound for better treadwear. The Defender LTX has been out for 2 years now with high rated reviews.

6 skids that can still keep you under 10,001 pounds ain't all that common, either.

It still holds true, most expedite loads are one or two skids... or more than four skids. Meaning, the three and four skids loads are the distinct minority of expedite loads, with the majority being five or more and two or less. "But, but, but, the more pallets you can haul and the more weight...

Out west, they let you know where the Democrats are.

Rience Priebus just got voted off the island.

May like the Democrats did with Obamacare. I said it then, and I still think it's the case, because national health care affects every American on such a fundamental and personal level, or needs to be voted on by the states as a Constitutional Amendment. Or at the very least, as legislation...

I guess you could look at it that way. The easy cheap shot retort would be that McCain has a brain tumor. But McCain has been unwaveringly consistent since well before the beginnings of the Obamacare debate in 2008 that health insurance and healthcare on a national level is so fundamental and...

Running like a well-oiled machine. Unfortunately, it's a Rube Goldberg Machine.

My point wasn't disfunctional or not. They say that about every White House (they also say, "No, really, this White House really is disfunctional!") . My point was that since "only" means solely or exclusively, well, you know.

I got a load! Calexico to Romulus. Yay! Hey, you know those Walmarts with the covered parking? Solar panels.

Wow. How many "onlys" can you come up with? It could also be, or only, that the leader doesn't want to focus his own time and energies on the shakeup to shakeout leakers and would prefer to focus on his agenda rather than a distraction.

Incidentally, Senator Murkowski said that while it "was a difficult conversation," she doesn't think characterizing it as a "threat" is appropriate.

Sure. If the head of said organization brought someone in specifically to shake things up, such behavior would not only be tolerated, but expected.

But they cannot name and install their own criminal investigation special prosecutor, as claimed.

That's Politics 101. You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours. Refuse to scratch my back, and I'll claw yours.

Congress does indeed have the power to investigate. That power isn't explicit in the Constitution, but the Supreme Court said, "They have to be able to conduct investigations in order to create laws, duh!" (not an actual quote) They have the power to investigate and gather information on the...

They have. But none of them have been named and deployed by Congress. The Constitution makes quite clear that one branch of government creates the laws, another branch enforces the laws, and a third branch adjudicates the constitutionally of the laws. The various laws created by the Legislative...

There needs to be some kind of high crime, or high misdemeanor, of which there has been no evidence thus far. Lots of very creative, wishful thinking, though. At this point all they've really got is, "I don't like him, he Tweets too much, he's orange, and I'm butthurt because he won the election."

Congress could certainly write up and overwhelming pass a bill establishing a particular individual as a special prosecutor, but first they'd have to set the Constitution on fire and let it burn completely to ashes. It would be much easier and quicker to impeach the president than it would be...