Search results

Goes on all the time. As for the Petreaus mess, most of what I have seen says he knew in July or August depending on the source. One of many. Timeline of the Petraeus affair - CNN.com

I'm sure there was since several knew of his affair before all of this hit. Really just common sense. Hardly need the understanding of "process or the bureaucracy" to figure that out. ;) More will come out. Took two and half months to squeeze out what they got so far. Probably take another as...

I was hoping on just the 47 percent. Guess that number is slightly off. ;)

Have to agree. May be more takers than makers based on this last election.:cool:

Sure. As long as you are convinced. You got some work to do on everyone else based on this thread. Oh you would, would you ? ... LOL ... Sure why not? There is nothing wrong with legitimate scrutiny ... there is everything wrong with overblown "scrutiny" done solely for...

Texas would certainly be one. They pay in to the Federal government quite a bit more than they actually recieve back. As for a third party, maybe maybe not. That whole thing comes down to who has the money and who doesn't. When you have to have a billion dollars or more for a presidential race...

Ok.....so you are reading a lot of political blogs. Got it.;) I would agree with Jim's question in that your information is primarily based on what you think Petreaus said or didn't say. The guy had a ongoing affair and was forced to resign. I would say anything he said should be scutinized...

And there lies the problem. I can't say they outright lied about it, but the dems answers have been all over the place. It would be one thing IF this was the results of information after a week or two. Just not the case. This has went on for over two months and only now are answers starting to...

True but old Ron will be long gone before it ever happens.

He does but not nearly big enough to do anything. May have to go with Rand.

You and me both. My..... how things have changed. Gotta love the good old days.

No....I think this memo is clear and the correlation has equalled the causation if you will. Obviously the republicans have some "changin" to do but any of that will have little value without some gifts. Changing demographics clearly show that. If that is not the case, then I would love to...

No mention of tanks but looks like they are gearing up for a response. Wal-Mart fights back on Black Friday strike | Money - WESH Home

And fail they did and will continue to do so unless that "rebranding" comes with some gifts. Probably going to take more than a "buritto" though. Democrats care as much about the general public as the republicans. But did exercise the free agenda to percieve they do. Republicans offered...

Possibly. They had all kinds of problems with unions only being a part. At the end of the day, no one blinked and they are shutting the doors. A buyer may pick up a part of them (big maybe) but you can be assured it will be with non-union workers.

Just looking at democrats, Kerry would be a better pick than Rice. I'm not sure Obama really wins anything?

I believe that is likely Walmart's position.

Thats not very lady like. ;)

That is very interesting and surely played a part in their bankrupty. It does beg the question as to whether other bakeries face that same problem? It appears where it has affected others they just move out of the country. Good post though. Not sure where that line is verses tariffs or union...

Don't have to look too deep in to this one if the White House is already playing the race card.