Search results

Good news for sure. ;)

Out of who they had in the primary, he was basically it. There either were issues with the others or they lacked the finances for a full campaign. That is something that the republican party is going to have to do some soul searching on. Who would be the next person that would give them a fair...

Lesson to new folks. This is why new companies carry too much risk unless you have a fair amount of capital to burn. Might have started well intended but year after year we see these kind of places go down in flames. Guess what...it is always something. In this case hopefully those owed will get...

I would have to agree in that they didn't run a good candidate. Didn't offer any freebies either. I guess Obama fits that.;)

The war on the coal industry will be felt by many. When you close that many plants and they aren't replaced, something has to give. The number I am hearing is expect at least a 25 percent jump in utilities in those effected areas. The poor may or may not be effected. Some areas are giving...

The problem after this election seems that the republicans have tried to be democrats. Because of changing demographics, hard conservatives aren't going to get what they want no matter who they put up there. That is the challenge and that there is really no answer at this point. Republican...

Lot of places to look for reform but that isn't the first place I would be looking unless it is fraud.

Absolutely! Can't take any of this too seriously.

I'll jump right on it. Probably about the time you put your disclaimers on the posts where you say something but really mean something else. :cool:

Yep....there certainly is that. Of course there are some that will pretend it is a "fallacy".:cool:

Progress can be a wonderful thing. ;)

"It really should shouldn't". Maybe better work on that first before you worry about anyones "capabilities".

You will find it. You need something to occupy your time.

He clearly states he is liberal. So his point of view will come from there. That doesn't mean he is any more wrong or right than the other guy. You are right. Objectivity is hard to find which is my point.

Your piece is from David Gordon who is a total liberal. Of course he is going to offer that kind of opinion. Might have to do better than that. Maybe from someone with some objectivity.:rolleyes: About the Mises Institute

I would agree. The time for a third party IF it is going to happen has to be during the primaries. If they fail at that point, then we are back to the D/R routine unless one can carry enough votes and has the money to effect the outcome in a POSITIVE way.

That's exactly it. The idea that money played no part and is a "fallacy" is hilarious. I don't believe I have ever heard a campaign manager ever say on a national level, "We can win this even though we are broke". BTW...I like the Santa over the Grinch comparison.

So we are to assume that raising and spending almost a billion dollars to get elected had nothing to do with Obama winning? Yep....you keep believing that.

That is where the fallacy concept goes out the window. Have to look at the whole picture. It cost zero to make the video on Romney but they spent millions promoting it. Those millions a third party wouldn't come close to having. And....have to remember, Obama only won by 3.5 million votes...