Search results

Good luck on your new gig. As always, you have been great to work with over the years. Don't be a stranger, and pop in from time to time and let us know how you are doing.

I could see possibly employees with minimal training. The parameters for a actual employee are much different than a independent contractor. Just a hypothetical, what happens if a driver sneezes or yawns? Shut the truck down, go get a physical, and since you yawned, you are now on the sidelines...

All the more reason that I would oppose driver facing cameras. She is listing all the reasons they might be used against you verses a benefit to the driver. Keep in mind, the very people that are looking at a recording, are probably the least qualified to look at it. So who is looking at it? The...

I hope he is in the debates. Should make for some funny entertainment.

I guess it is to some extent. Although I am mindful that most churches need some form of income to keep the doors open. You would think though that they would at least give a plastic Jesus for the donation.

Not because they ruled in favor of same sex marriages, but how they did it. It is hard telling on how they would rule on something like that.

The only real argument I could see is if they demand every church marry them. I could see some problems there.

Don't need a camera for that. Speed can be taken right off the ECM. As a secondary verification on something like that, a investigation usually can determine vehicle speeds based on numerous factors.

With all the problems that exist today, I can't believe we are wasting time on flags. Too many other problems to focus on.

I agree with what you are saying or even maybe a year ago. With a change in the makeup of the court, now I'm not so sure.

Can't argue with Phil's premise, but it is all about the dollar. Training of any form is more expensive than the camera.

Nope. Can't go by that. Seen how Obamacare went through the court today. It isn't what something actually says, it is how they want to interpret it.

That would be the risk that carriers aren't likely to take unless there is a surplus of drivers and trucks. If hypothetically Panther decided to do this, I would have no issue having the trucks pulled by the end of the week. Too many other carriers want our fleets services.

To some degree they did and continue even now. The other side with regards to manufacturing changed a lot due to a global economy. Lot of foreign competition for a lot of things and unions basically priced themselves out of the market.

I was waiting to see what reaction that would bring. :D

I would agree. Bill Clinton would be a Republican by todays standards.

Well you know when you throw money at it, the problem gets worse. You know this because we never had these problems at the level they are now 20 years ago, and very little got thrown at it then.