'Wikileaks' soldier Bradley Manning moved to new prison

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
BBC News

The US soldier accused of leaking a trove of secret government documents later published by the Wikileaks website is to be moved to a military prison in Kansas, officials have said.

Pte First Class Bradley Manning has been held pending court martial at a Marine Corps base in Virginia.

His transfer comes amid international criticism of his treatment.

His supporters say he has been confined to a cell for 23 hours a day and forced regularly to undress.

Suspect's 'best interest'

At a press conference at the Pentagon on Tuesday, defence department general counsel Jeh Johnson said Pte Manning would be moved imminently to a new pre-trial jail at Fort Leavenworth, in the state of Kansas.

Mr Johnson and other military officials said the Fort Leavenworth jail - which was opened in January - was better equipped to handle long-term pre-trial stays then the Marine Corps base at Quantico, Virginia.

Among other things, the Fort Leavenworth jail has better mental health support, officials said.

"We have assessed this is in Pte Manning's best interest to move him at this juncture in the case," Mr Johnson said.

"All things considered, we concluded that going forward this is the best facility for him."

Mr Johnson said the transfer should not be interpreted as a criticism of Pte Manning's treatment at Quantico, though he acknowledged senior defence officials had been involved in the process.

Resignation

Pte Manning's civilian lawyer David Coombs has said the soldier has been under 24-hour surveillance and has been forced to relinquish his clothing before bedding down for the night, then forced to stand naked at roll call.

Officials have repeatedly denied Pte Manning has been mistreated, although last month a top US state department official, spokesman PJ Crowley, resigned after saying the military's treatment of the Wikileaks suspect was "ridiculous and counterproductive".

Pte Manning, an intelligence analyst who joined the US Army in 2007, is suspected of leaking 720,000 diplomatic and military documents, including a database of military records from the Iraq war, Afghan war records, classified diplomatic cables and other materials.

In the past year, Wikileaks has published troves of documents it titled the Iraq War Logs, the Afghan War Diary, and reams of secret US state department cables spanning five decades.

Pte Manning has been charged with using unauthorised software on government computers to download classified information and to make intelligence available to "the enemy", and other counts related to leaking intelligence and theft of public records
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
I do not know the facts in Bradley Mannings treatment at this prison , I did think I saw some where that he was under suicide watch. If so this may have been standard treatment for some one under suicide watch.

Wikileaks also released more cables yesterday saying that the U.S. was funding Syrian protesters. I would think that this accusation would be detrimental to the Syrian protest movement. If wikileaks means no harm why did they do this?

jimmy
 

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
I do not know the facts in Bradley Mannings treatment at this prison , I did think I saw some where that he was under suicide watch. If so this may have been standard treatment for some one under suicide watch.

Wikileaks also released more cables yesterday saying that the U.S. was funding Syrian protesters. I would think that this accusation would be detrimental to the Syrian protest movement. If wikileaks means no harm why did they do this?

jimmy

Fox news had it on yesterday with the total amount being 6 million dollars since 2006
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
I am all in favor of people being free. Not to sure the U.S. is itself any favors by providing funding to the Syrians protesters.

jimmy
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
This is a good move - Ft. Leavenworth is home to the military's felons and our most hardened criminals and is certainly not to be mistaken for one of the federal "country clubs" that house white-collar convicts. Pvt. Manning will soon be wishing he were back at Quantico; one can only imagine how this little fairy will fit in with the inhabitants of this place.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Take him off of suicide watch too. Who cares if the twit hangs himself. It would do us ALL a favor.
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
Julian Assange almost surely caused more misery and death of people who just wanted their voices heard, with the release of more U.S. goverment cables yesterday 4/18/2011, claiming that the U.S. Goverment had been providing funding to Syrian protesters. For some one who claims to only be interested in holding goverments accountable for their policies and actions . He seems to have caused a lot problems for individuals who just want to speak out and have their say.

jimmy
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
I do not know the facts in Bradley Mannings treatment at this prison , I did think I saw some where that he was under suicide watch. If so this may have been standard treatment for some one under suicide watch.
He started under suicide watch, then was moved to something similar but lesser. This was criticized by those familiar with Manning as being unnecessary, simply a punitive move.

Wikileaks also released more cables yesterday saying that the U.S. was funding Syrian protesters. I would think that this accusation would be detrimental to the Syrian protest movement. If wikileaks means no harm why did they do this?

jimmy

Maybe because it's a fact (I don't know that it is, but they apparently see it as a fact). They report leaked news, so there you go. They're not an American organization, so they don't take into account the effect of the release.

If you were an American journalist and came across information detrimental to Sweden, would that affect your decision to publish? It shouldn't.
 

blackpup

Veteran Expediter
He started under suicide watch, then was moved to something similar but lesser. This was criticized by those familiar with Manning as being unnecessary, simply a punitive move.



Maybe because it's a fact (I don't know that it is, but they apparently see it as a fact). They report leaked news, so there you go. They're not an American organization, so they don't take into account the effect of the release.

If you were an American journalist and came across information detrimental to Sweden, would that affect your decision to publish? It shouldn't.

I am all for Freedom of Information. Believe in it strongly. Reporters have used their judgement before and not released information that would result in harm to individuals. Wikileaks has used pooor judgement releasing this information due to extreme bias towards the USA.

jimmy

jimmy
 
Top